Right now it seems like signs are generally pointing towards the upcoming Switch being effectively the successor to the current one. It's most likely going to last a good while longer.
If this thing wasn't so beefy, I'd think that a true successor would be necessary by fall, 2023. But if this upgrade gets some exclusive games (while cloud versions of them are technically still available on base models), then I don't think a brand new system is mandatory for a while longer. So much remains to be seen.
Clouds are acceptable as sources for rain, not for games.
Though clouds are also good for game saves, right?
As long as buying the cloud version lets you play the "real" version on the pro and vice versa it should be fine.
See that would be cool. Cloud version coming with your physical cartridge/download!
Id love that tho I imagine it isn't possible. Unless they use something like a graphene battery and go to 20Wish, I assume the best we can get is 8-12GB LP RAM, 6-8 cores @2-2.5Ghz, and 1.5-2.5 Teraflops with a 1080p screen.
frankly If switch 2 in 2023 is just a PS4+ portable, I'd be fine with it.
What you described would be quite a significant and awesome upgrade. Even if this NS+ is basically a modern PS4 Pro, that would be stellar.
I mean, it does seem much better hardware wise, but I don't think that matters in any way in how the business side of things will work out. Major AAA companies won't port exclusively to it if the user base is small, and Nintendo won't make Zelda/Pokémon/Mario exclusive to it unless they actually plan on ending support for the launch Switch.
I also think it will be messaging hell for Nintendo trying to explain all of a sudden (be it 2 or 3 years from now) to everyone who bought a Switch that they can't play the new Switch games on their Switch, because it isn't a Switch Plus. I don't think Nintendo will be the first company to completely forego generations of consoles and go full on hardware iterations of it.
I bet we will see a few exclusive that could only happen on the new hardware, but nothing expensive or that would require a lot of resources to happen.
There are some that wouldn't mind either, if Nintendo took an iPhone-esque approach, but with new models coming out once every two years. Maybe not the most likely, but not bad either, depending how each one differs.
I wouldn't play them personally, but it's fine I guess.
I would be more open to the idea if this was the case.
That's fair.
I said yes, but only if this is the case.
True, that would help.
My preference goes native scaled version - > cloud version - > late native port - > Thor 2: The Dark World.
Poor Thor 2!
If the rumors that a new Switch is coming out later this year & that it's noticeably more powerful than the existing one, I'm expecting Splatoon 3 at the very least will be exclusive to it.
I could see Splatoon 3 looking a lot better on NS+, but not be an exclusive to it. First party Nintendo games, I think, should run on all systems, from cartridge or eShop.
It wouldn't affect anyone playing on the upgraded model so I can't think of a reason anyone should vote no
Good thought!
Those exclusives, if they exist at all, will be few and far between just like with New 3DS. It just doesn't make commercial sense for third parties. Switch Plus/Pro isn't going to be Switch 2.
That doesn't make any sense at all, especially for a multiplayer game that thrives on the size of its community. And Switch is only 4 years old, and 2 years old for Switch Lite, Nintendo isn't going screw over their existing userbase so quickly.
I was trying to come up with a having your cake abs eating it too concept, but is it likely? Hard to tell.
Nice!
How many exclusive games did the New versions of Nintendo consoles get? Xenoblade for the New 3DS and some (mostly irrelevant) DSiWare for the DSi.
I don't think this is going to change much with the New Switch.
Not many, but this upgraded mode does appear to be quite a bit more powerful than what New 3DS was to the original.
Sounds terrible. Just make the Switch 2 if the jump is that significant.
If that happens though, NS' life of guaranteed titles coming out for it, probably won't be as long lasting. No company will abandon it ASAP because of the install base, but I don't think Nintendo needs Nintendo Switch 2 just yet.
Yeah I was floating that idea before. My idea would be that you get a Cloud version with every "Pro" or Switch successor purchase. You can play the cloud version if your hardware isn't supported and you can play natively when you have the required hardware.
It's vastly better than not having access to games.
Would also mean that you don't have to miss out on launch games when you can't secure the console itself.
I like that thought and has a very similar idea. Excellent.
It also doesn't make a lot of sense to release another Splatoon on a system that already has one.
I think Nintendo is going to 3rd pillar the new Switch - if it's successful early on, they'll turn it into the Switch 2 and they'll make a lot of upcoming games exclusive to it. If it's not successful, they'll turn it into the nSwitch and it'll just run existing Switch games better. I think they're aiming for it to be the Switch 2, but they'll leave room to backpedal if early reactions are negative. In any case, it won't be called the Switch Pro or the Switch 2.
It would be wild if this thing was indeed Nintendo Switch 2 at launch this fall. Entirely possible.
Fuck that noise.
The Switch is meant to be a portable device, and if I suddenly can't play a chunk of my library because I'm away from a Wi-Fi connection that's some bullshit.
On top of that, cloud gaming has made great strides in recent years but it's still not ready for primetime, and especially not everywhere in the country (or world).
Could be solid for folks whose only console, home or otherwise, is a Nintendo Switch.
I don't see a need for any exclusives at all. It's not like the 3DS, which was so underpowered, and such a different internal architecture, it couldn't handle ports from Wii. Switch is different - most console games could be ported to Switch with graphical compromises (see: Witcher 3). If Nintendo ever releases a more powerful Switch, I think it should run the exact same games as Switch, just with better graphics (and NOT 4k - 4k isn't needed, just better 1080p graphics).
With NS+, bring Mortal Kombat 11 to looking like the Xbox One and PS4 versions and I'd be very happy with that.
Just leave it in the dust
Leave what in the dust?
Beyond that, I think the plausible target audiences for these games on Switch would overlap heavily with the people who would be buying upgraded Switches anyway. I'm sure there's demand for those games on the Switch platform, but the cloud versions would be competing with the native versions here.
Perhaps native versions come with cloud access. Play now on your base models, but have the cartridge/eShop download for when you upgrade.
I think this will happen because it is already happening with Control and Hitman. I don't see it as a common practice except for the big multiplatform titles that couldn't come to OG Switch in any other way.
Those ran well in my opinion.
Not a chance they would put such a giant damper on one of their biggest, fastest growing franchises, especially a multiplayer focused one. None of the assets looked particularly better than anything in 2, if it were to be exclusive to the stronger device you would expect it to look better even from such an early trailer.
I see Splatoon 3 running on everything.
that would take a significant leap in infrastructure that Nintendo doesn't have. and not in an "lol nintendo" kinda way. they're better off handing such kind of services to Nvidia with their Geforce Now platform
Maybe Nintendo teams up for such a feature.
They are already doing cloud versions and will have more reason to when the native Switch Pro exclusives start becoming more frequent.
Right on.
If there was truly no way for it to run on the base version without serious compromises then sure. It would be better than nothing.
That's how I see it too.
Should they put exclusives as cloud: yes. Do I want pro exclusives: not really.
What do you hope the new system to primarily be?
I mean they could do that as a solution, but I personally have zero interest in playing a cloud version. I don't plan on getting the new switch model as of now, so I would prefer there not to be exclusives, but even if there are, as long as they're not Nintendo only exclusives I probably won't care as they'll be playable somewhere else.
Interesting take, but I wonder if you were an NS-only player, would you feel differently.
It would be a good option, but it shouldn't be mandatory.
Fair enough.
Exclusives are a bad idea. It's bad for consumers and the devs.
Even bad for gamers if at least there's still a cloud version available over nothing at all?
Nothing has been announced but even if the rumours are true, it won't get exclusive games. It'll likely be similar to Xbox One X and PS4 Pro.
That could very well be the case.
I don't think Nintendo are going to make any revision exclusives themselves this time; at least not for a few years, if the iterative model people have speculated about comes to pass.
The thing about Nintendo's first-party exclusives on New 3DS is that they were all downports from more powerful hardware. Xenoblade, Fire Emblem Warriors and SNES Virtual Console. Nintendo don't have more powerful hardware to port down from; and they'll be making new Switch games with both the old and new models in mind.
Nintendo aren't barring third-parties from making exclusives. It'll happen. They have games running on PS4 / Xbox One that might be able to run acceptably on the Switch thanks to the new model. Most publishers probably won't want to sacrifice that existing install base, but if it's between releasing the game on the Switch family at all, or not, some will be willing to take the trade-off. Just a reminder that one of the few physical New 3DS exclusives was Minecraft; it was a late port, but still noteworthy.
The Control and Hitman Cloud versions aren't available in my country, so let's just say I don't see that as an elegant solution.
Good points.
It wasn't really the case with none of the previous devices, the entire lines died with the initial one, hell even with Game Boy, in Japan the last Game Boy game came after the last Game Boy Color game.
And if it's ports of PS4/XB1 they really aren't exclusives either...
I meant NS family-exclusive, like if you were a solo NS owner, not yet ready to buy a new system of any kind.
I don't think this system is going to play out like past revisions. It's already looking very different on the tech side based on the recent Bloomberg reports.
Also, exclusive in this context is relative to the current Switch. Other platforms are irrelevant.
This does feel like a "new waters" platform.
So Xbox Gamepass but only for cloud games? I would love that because for $30 a year that would be a steal! Though I doubt they would do that.
Something like that, but you'd still have to buy the game, one by one...or perhaps, when you buy the cartridge/eShop download, you get the cloud version for your base model, before you upgrade.
If the rumored increase in power is true, then I will be surprised if Ubi does not port at least one of the recent AC games to the Switch Plus, one that can't run on Switch or at least not well enough to bother.
Heck I can already picture the box in my head. "Assassin's Creed: The Ancient World Collection".
Yeah, why wouldn't Ubisoft want their latest Assassin's Creed on as many platforms as possible? You get it!
That's what I'm thinking Capcom will do for the RE games. Though for games like Guilty Gear Strive, Tekken 7, & even Devil May Cry 5, I'm not sure if a cloud version would be a viable option given that they require more precise inputs.
The OP is mainly talking about third-party games that otherwise wouldn't be feasible on the OG Switch.
Thanks for your input and I'm glad you got it.
Third party? Ok, I play them on PC anyway.
Should have no first party exclusives tho.
Some like that portable in house factor. But if you have a PC, then yeah, that will win when it comes to graphics.
I highly doubt that Nintendo will do any Switch Pro exclusives themselves anytime soon.
Probably not "them".
It's all good!
But again, would you rather have RE7/RE2make/RE3make/DMC5/GGST/T7/FFVIIR/etc. on the Switch Pro or not have those games on any Switch at all? Plus we already have reports that there will be some third-party exclusives for the Switch Pro. The XB1X comparison isn't comparable because the PS4/XB1 were already at the top of the console horsepower food chain at the time.
Exactly!
All good!
If we start getting exclusives on the new machine I'll just give up and sell my Switch.
Would you buy the new model?
I doubt that devs/pubs would do a native version and a cloud version for a single game because the ROI just wouldn't be there to justify doing both. I imagine that if a game can't run on the OG Switch natively, then a cloud version would be all that the platform in general gets (if it's even worth bothering to do so).
I also doubt the Switch Pro gets a bunch of major exclusives either, since platform segregation is the last thing Nintendo wants happening when the Switch is merely in the middle of its life cycle at this point. It'll be considered the same type of upgrade that DSi, N3DS, PS4 Pro, X1X, etc. were.
Could be the case.
It's better that than not at all?
But I imagine whatever Nintendo makes will be scaleable. Anything more ambitious will be saved for whatever system comes next. Third parties are another story.
True. I see Nintendo scaling anything they make, for all three. Third parties might not be able to scale everything.
Can I just respond to the fact that holy shit, I'm wildly impressed by an OP responding to so many people on their topic! Great work! 💪🏾
Hey thank you! This is something I started back in the day when I was working for Gamers.com and 1Up.com after that. Whenever I make a thread, I always respond to every single person. It's my thing. 😁 I appreciate your comment!
I know it and even so I am against the model of revisions with exclusives, I find it very manipulative and dishonest.
Even 4.5 years into a platform's life?
So it's like a New 3DS all over again
But with more potential
I'm more worried about how the next Switch revision will handle old games. Just sold my regular Switch but kept Zelda and Mario Odyssey. Fully expecting having to rebuy them if i want to take advantage of the hardware. If so, i think i'll just skip it.
I think...certainly hope, that Nintendo Switch 2 will be 100% backwards compatible with all NS games!