• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

DinkyDev

Member
Feb 5, 2021
5,119
Layoffs have hit Netflix again, with the streamer letting go of roughly 300 staffers on Thursday, Variety has learned exclusively.

The cuts are across multiple business functions in the company, with the bulk of the jobs lost in the U.S.
These new layoffs, which Variety first reported would be coming earlier this week, hit just a few weeks after the streaming giant — which has a global work force of roughly 11,000 staffers — made an initial round of reductions of similar size in May. At that time, Netflix laid off 150 employees and dozens of contractors and part-time workers. The streamer indicated more rounds of layoffs would be coming this year following that first group, as the company tries to adjust for its heavily weakened stock price.
"Today we sadly let go of around 300 employees," a Netflix spokesperson told Variety. "While we continue to invest significantly in the business, we made these adjustments so that our costs are growing in line with our slower revenue growth. We are so grateful for everything they have done for Netflix and are working hard to support them through this difficult transition."
variety.com

Netflix Begins Second Round of Layoffs, 300 Positions Cut (EXCLUSIVE)

Layoffs have hit Netflix again, with the streamer letting go of roughly 300 staffers on Thursday.
 
Oct 27, 2017
12,374
What a shitshow of a company. They need to layoff their leadership; no idea how they even got to the point of needing 11k employees.
 
Oct 25, 2017
19,104
911860.mp4
 

viral

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,632
Sucks for the people being laid down, but 300 out of 11000 isn't many in the grand scheme of things.
 

PeskyToaster

Member
Oct 27, 2017
15,314
Could fire like three executives who probably caused all the issues and are making it worse for the same cost savings.
 
Oct 27, 2017
12,374
Has a company ever thought that maybe when you're spiraling, hiring more people to work on the problem might be the way to go?
They already have a massive workforce, the problem might be in the fact that they constantly spend a lot of money for shit projects and overextend and have no real smart management of their resources. They weren't prepared for competition despite owning the market for over a decade as far as streaming goes, and at the first sign of a challenge they hit the panic button. They ironically don't seem to know how to do anything but scale up, which doesn't work anymore once you've had a market saturation point. Those are pretty good signs of poor resource management.

Hiring more people now is going to make the problem worse, not better.
 

loco

Member
Jan 6, 2021
5,525
Feel bad for those that got let go and hope they land something decent right away.
 

faint

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,157
Of course not, they just don't seem to be run very well.

Nothing has changed with how they run. This is the result of a 10+ year bull run entering a bear market. Every major tech company is experiencing layoffs. This is actually quite small in the grand scheme of things.
 

peppermints

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,656
What a shitshow of a company. They need to layoff their leadership; no idea how they even got to the point of needing 11k employees.

That doesn't sound that extreme to me. The engineering effort alone in supporting the sheer scale they operate at has to be massive. Not including actual content development, marketing etc.

Not disagreeing that they are a shit show from the upper management and above but that's about what I expected headcount wise.
 

Green

Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,411
Nothing has changed with how they run. This is the result of a 10+ year bull run entering a bear market. Every major tech company is experiencing layoffs. This is actually quite small in the grand scheme of things.

Yep. They've been drooping since ~Nov '21 like everyone else. -75% draw down puts them back to 2017 levels for their stock so you can't really expect them to continue operating like they're still worth 4X their current value and growing... This is the story many companies are facing right now.
 

Gamer @ Heart

Member
Oct 26, 2017
9,603
It's always wild when someone puts into perspective the amount layoffs save over the cost of one dud movie or show. At this point there is no mega hit that could suddenly bring more eyes or accounts to Netflix because of their saturation, so it all feels like a waste.

Did they transition into owning their own studio space, props, etc or do they still rent everything? I remember reading that was a huge part of their costs as they didn't own anything long term like the other studios had which cost them a ton in the long run.
 

thediamondage

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,277
Bit of a shell game, their stock is in the toilet and the only way for it to go up is two ways

1. increase revenue, aka get a ton of new people to subscribe
2. cut costs, aka fire employees and cut back on show development

They are clearly focusing on #2, I think the next few quarters are gonna make #1 way worse as a ton of people are realizing "why the fuck am I still paying a netflix sub, I never watch anything on there anymore" so we will see #2 repeat a lot for a while.

There isn't really any danger of them disappearing for a long time, they have ~$20b in debt, $6b in cash, and still earn enough from netflix sub fees to be profitable and stay in business for a long time. But when things go bad it can accelerate quickly, if say they lost 10m subs one year, its higher odds they'd lose another 20m subs the year after than gain new subs and that kind of fall from grace would be the time to think the company is in deep trouble.
 

faint

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,157
Yep. They've been drooping since ~Nov '21 like everyone else. -75% draw down puts them back to 2017 levels for their stock so you can't really expect them to continue operating like they're still worth 4X their current value and growing... This is the story many companies are facing right now.

Well according to this thread they should be hunkering down and employing more people while they struggle as this is clearly a result of their favorite show being cancelled! Growing companies expanding? Nonsense!
 

Deepwater

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,349
massively overvalued company regressing to its long term mean. A failure of leadership to read the economic temperature and overextend itself to the point where it has to do multiple rounds of layoffs.
 

Deleted member 43

Account closed at user request
Banned
Oct 24, 2017
9,271
It's always wild when someone puts into perspective the amount layoffs save over the cost of one dud movie or show. At this point there is no mega hit that could suddenly bring more eyes or accounts to Netflix because of their saturation, so it all feels like a waste.

Did they transition into owning their own studio space, props, etc or do they still rent everything? I remember reading that was a huge part of their costs as they didn't own anything long term like the other studios had which cost them a ton in the long run.
They do own studios spaces, etc., but Netflix is even still more a distributor than a production company, so a ton of money still flows outside them.
 

Gigglepoo

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,317
Netflix's problem is with the people actually making the decisions, though. They spend way too much money on mediocre content. If they aren't replacing the people at the top, layoffs and cutbacks won't solve their problems.