Yea, I do not recall a single person suggesting this approach.The main argument against the available data, that I remember, was that it would be antithetical to accepted console design to go "narrow and fast", ie pump the clocks to 36CU@2ghz, so it is pretty interesting that they actually went further in that direction w/ [email protected]
Yup, Cerny lied when he said downclock would be a few % at most.
jason said they were aiming to beat stadia number. 9.2 is not even close to that. 10.3 is basically never going to happen in game.They didn't give you any false hope.
9.2 Tflops to 12 Tflops is basically a 1800p vs 2160p difference.
Same, after all the hype revolving around the specs, I'm actually quite happy with what was presented. Now we just need to see the games.PS5 day 1 for me. I'm quite impressed with what they put together. Also, they released official specs, so does that mean the competition is officially complete?
That is how I heard it so don't take it as gospel. Sorry to bum you out.
I don't really need to defend myself, and I think my track record speaks for itself, but everything I've been saying for two years about next-gen hardware has been consistent and proven out (or will prove out when the machines launch). For example: https://www.resetera.com/threads/ne...r-see-staff-post.159131/page-92#post-27509992Klee, @jschreier , @BGs , osiris, thanks for giving us false hope for over a year. lmao.
❤
We knew nothing, just quoted an official AMD document like monkeys :)
TBF, Even 7Tflops of RDNA2 should beat the GCN 10.7Tflops of Stadia.jason said they were aiming to beat stadia number. 9.2 is not even close to that. 10.3 is basically never going to happen in game.
klee said ps5 specs were higher.
BGs and osiris were 12+ tflops.
Nope, still gonna be 36CU for that PS4 BC 🤣My first prediction for PS5 Pro:
CPU: 8c/16t max freq 4.0 GHz
GPU: 21.7 TF, 72CU, max freq 2300 MHz
RAM: 20-24 GB, 640 - 816 GB/s
SSD: 2 TB at 6.0 GB/s (raw)
Launch 2023 or 2024
Cerny explicitly said there will be a bay. The SSD is replaceable with even off-the-shelf SSDs that meet spec. Currently no such SSD exists on the market.Did anyone take away from the SSD talk the the SSD is replaceable? Or is there a bay to *add* and SSD?
The system was always meant to run hot.Props to you and Colbert for sticking to your guns. I've always said that 36 CU's was possible, regardless of Github or not. I'm curious whether you think a 2.23 GHZ variable clock speed was Sony's original plan or did they get surprised by MS's plans and decided they had to go for much higher clocks.
isn't it going to be expensive as well compared to Xbox because its a pcie 4.0 and to hit those speeds and get certified by sony?Did anyone take away from the SSD talk the the SSD is replaceable? Or is there a bay to *add* and SSD?
so people, now microsoft can use the "most powerful console ever"
Is XSX still cool and quiet all the time?
Did anyone take away from the SSD talk the the SSD is replaceable? Or is there a bay to *add* and SSD?
The latterDid anyone take away from the SSD talk the the SSD is replaceable? Or is there a bay to *add* and SSD?
He said only in rare instances would clock speed have to be dropped 10%. Are you saying that's a lie?He's not lying though. He is saying a game can and will hit 2.23GHz, but it is in no way sustainable with high CPU clocks.
I will make a bet that this console hits 9.2TF more than it hits 10.2tf when running games.
No idea how much noise and how much heat either retail unit will make.
I thought Klee and Matt both had final specs at one point they said.jason said they were aiming to beat stadia number. 9.2 is not even close to that. 10.3 is basically never going to happen in game.
klee said ps5 specs were higher.
BGs and osiris were 12+ tflops.
we don't know this, radeon on rdna1 are almost always above basic frequency but indeed, 2.23ghz? waiting for some df benchmarksjason said they were aiming to beat stadia number. 9.2 is not even close to that. 10.3 is basically never going to happen in game.
Yeah, wow.Github was the SuperDaE hack all along, omg. lol
So now it's tf vs SSD. Will be a wild battle.
Went from a big smile on the SSD part to huh on the cu, gpu, tf part.
If it's not quiet, it wasn't worth it.
I thought he explained this bit fairly clearly - it can't maintain the boost clocks if you hammer the 256bit (AVX?) instructions, otherwise it's fine.Yeah, that makes sense. I'm now hoping that DF or somebody is able to test what that means. Like does it keep those clocks 90% of the time, or 50%? Does it drop 5%? 10%? 20%? This is all super important for how developers are able to take advantage.........
isn't it going to be expensive as well compared to Xbox because its a pcie 4.0 and to hit those speeds and get certified by sony?
Why are some people saying 9.2 TF's? The man himself said for the vast majority of time, the GPU clock won't deviate from 2.23 GHZ.
dev kits?No idea how much noise and how much heat either retail unit will make.
And I guess this specialized cooling system should make that do-able.
"Most exciting hardware in 20 years."
Not really just the SSD.
10.3 TF console with High clock speeds, which mostly runs at max frequency and downclocks by frequency rather than power, 16 GB ram, ultra high speed SSD, man that SSD is amazing and impressive audio technology at 399$ is amazing.
Sony maximized performance to launch at 399$.