• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

GrapeApes

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
4,496
Independent Vermont Senator and Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders' campaign defended his use of the uncensored n-word in a 1997 book by explaining that "critiquing racism is not racism."
Right-wing website The Daily Caller surfaced a passage from Sanders' 1997 book "Outsider in the House" in which Sanders explains the political use of racism to pit poor white people against black people.
In the portion that the site quoted, Sanders wrote "For a hundred years, the white workers of the South were the most exploited white workers in America. They were paid the lowest wages, they endured the worst working conditions, their housing was abysmal, their kids went to the most backward schools, and very few could send their children to college. But what did they have? They were given 'niggers' to hate and look down on, 'niggers' who couldn't vote, drink at their water fountains, use the same bathrooms, or sit up front in the buses or movie theaters."

Later in that chapter — entitled "The Scapegoating Congress" — Sanders wrote that "white workers were encouraged to despise, and protect themselves from, their black neighbors, or face losing what little they had," but that "political activists and union organizers brought black and white workers together to fight for justice" because " they understood that real economic and political transformation would never be achieved as long as whites and blacks were busy fighting each other—rather than their common oppressors."
Sanders campaign National Press Secretary Briahna Joy Gray responded to the website's request for comment in an email:

"It should not need to be explained that critiquing racism is not racism, but let's give it a try. Senator Sanders is describing the well-documented racism and hatred that was used to divide the working class against itself in this country for hundreds of years. In fact, that entire chapter of the book is simply a recounting — and criticism — of the Republican strategy that was infamously described by GOP strategist Lee Atwater in 1981, which involved using racial bigotry and epithets to demonize people of color," Sanders campaign spokeswoman Briahna Gray told the DCNF in an email."Senator Sanders was attacking that disgusting strategy and, of course, he would not use the word outside of this context. His entire political career has been dedicated to building a multi-racial coalition of working people to finally overturn the bloody legacy of racial hatred in our country," Gray added.
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
OP why are you posting this hit job from the Daily Caller here? Even the quotes you put in the OP expose this as bullshit.
 

Doc Kelso

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,173
NYC
Yeah, the Daily Caller is fishing for some shit here. In the context of the work itself, it's important to use the word in order to explicitly call out why the history of that word is so awful.
 
OP
OP
GrapeApes

GrapeApes

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
4,496
OP why are you posting this hit job from the Daily Caller here? Even the quotes you put in the OP expose this as bullshit.
You don't think this is a valid discussion? Daily Caller is terrible but the subject matter isn't. We going to act like we can't talk about Ralph Northam's blackface pics cause of the original source?
 
Dec 31, 2017
7,119
The "defense" is more than sufficient. Look at the context in which the word was used - to bring attention to racist policies. If someone uses the full typed out n-word to bring attention to racism and/or criticize racism, it does not make them a racist. To set that as standard is ridiculous.
 

HStallion

Member
Oct 25, 2017
62,284
You don't think this is a valid discussion? Daily Caller is terrible but the subject matter isn't. We going to act like we can't talk about Ralph Northam's blackface pics cause of the original source?

It's not that useful as a discussion considering the incredibly disingenuous nature of the conversation from the very start.
 

V_Arnold

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
1,166
Hungary
And you cant even paint Bernie as racist, given that he has been consistently working towards passing laws that HELP the minorities in the US, unlike say, Uncle Joe there.

Bernie 'Racism' Sanders, right here folks:
ct-bernie-sanders-1963-chicago-arrest-20160219
 

fierygunrob

One Winged Slayer
Member
Jan 16, 2018
299
You don't think this is a valid discussion? Daily Caller is terrible but the subject matter isn't. We going to act like we can't talk about Ralph Northam's blackface pics cause of the original source?

"It should not need to be explained that critiquing racism is not racism, but let's give it a try. Senator Sanders is describing the well-documented racism and hatred that was used to divide the working class against itself in this country for hundreds of years. In fact, that entire chapter of the book is simply a recounting — and criticism — of the Republican strategy that was infamously described by GOP strategist Lee Atwater in 1981, which involved using racial bigotry and epithets to demonize people of color,"

how the fuck are you even comparing this to blackface
 

Daria

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,881
The Twilight Zone
You don't think this is a valid discussion? Daily Caller is terrible but the subject matter isn't. We going to act like we can't talk about Ralph Northam's blackface pics cause of the original source?

valid discussion is that there are times when describing history that you need to put in in context with legitimate language they would have used at that time. was he suppose to say they had "n*****s" throughout the whole book?
 

Ashodin

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,673
Durham, NC
You don't think this is a valid discussion? Daily Caller is terrible but the subject matter isn't. We going to act like we can't talk about Ralph Northam's blackface pics cause of the original source?
whoa what

You need to rethink the difference between active racism vs documenting and refuting racism.

You definitely posted this to start some commotion.
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
You don't think this is a valid discussion? Daily Caller is terrible but the subject matter isn't. We going to act like we can't talk about Ralph Northam's blackface pics cause of the original source?
It's not even remotely worth discussing because Bernie literally put the n-word in quotations because he was talking about how right wing politicians use racial division. Have you never read any academic literature about racism or the use of racial epithets? They also write out the word.

Comparing this to blackface is just...you aren't fooling anyone with this shit man.
 

faceless

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,198
even ignoring the source, those quotes are pretty clear.

push that agenda like a broken down van.
 

Eumi

Member
Nov 3, 2017
3,518
OP, I see that you know that slurs are bad, but you don't seem to understand why.
 
OP
OP
GrapeApes

GrapeApes

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
4,496
It's not even remotely worth discussing because Bernie literally put the n-word in quotations because he was talking about how right wing politicians use racial division. Have you never read any academic literature about racism or the use of racial epithets? They also write out the word.

Comparing this to blackface is just...you aren't fooling anyone with this shit man.
I bring up Northam cause it was first reported by a shitty right wing rag. Not comparing this to blackface.

I'm positive Bernie would not put this out today though. Y'all can defend this but you know he'd have chosen a different word if he was publishing it in 2019.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.