User Banned (2 Weeks): Creating a thread in bad faith; accumulated infractions with prior ban for trolling and antagonizing other users.
The Democratic Socialists of America had a convention. For those who don't know the DSA are, here's a rundown. At the con they've done things like voting on internal resolutions and elections.
Here's a breakdown of what happened at the con.
There have been some developments regarding their convention which has caused conflicts within the group.
These are the factions involved:
These are the resolutions the DSA are voting on:
Here is a detailed summary of the DSA resolutions which were approved.
Individual resolutions:
In the event of a Sanders Loss
Not One Penny: Anti-militarist Discipline and Candidates Endorsements
Support for decriminalisation of sex work
Decolonisation, self determination, anti-imperialism
Support for Open Borders
Massive Strike for Reproductive Justice
And more.
Resolution analysis
Reports on what's going on inside the DSA and the internal struggles it faces in the world of Donald Trump.
and a rebuttal.
What say you, ERA? What's your opinion on what the DSA are doing at their convention.
Here's a breakdown of what happened at the con.
There have been some developments regarding their convention which has caused conflicts within the group.
These are the factions involved:
Existing caucuses going into convention are (in no particular order):
- Bread & Roses (B&R): Formerly "Spring", an explicitly Marxist caucus descended from last Convention's "Momentum" slate. B&R probably has the most articulated idea of what they want DSA to be, which is a group that can create a mass workers' party largely through a combination of labor organizing and socialist electoralism. They tend to see the National organization's purpose as creating a united and coherent organization. "We oppose horizontalist practices that distort democracy into a series of endless meetings, replace accountable leadership with the tyranny of structurelessness, and drain decisions of consequences. We must make decisions about priorities and then commit to carrying them out."
- Build: The original "not-caucus" caucus. Descended from Praxis, the other big slate in 2017. Somewhat apolitical in their outlook, they publish a zine about what chapters are doing on the ground and have a vision of "base-building" that is much more local. "We believe that most of the national organization's troubles are the direct result of escalating factionalism, personal attacks, and a zero-sum approach to internal political differences." They generally favor decentralization/dispersement and distrust the national organization to accomplish tasks.
- Socialist Majority Caucus (SMC): Comprised largely of chapter leaders, national working group leaders and former DSA staff, they largely want to stay the course but improve upon old structures that haven't worked particularly well with the growth of the organization. They also house some members of the smaller "North Star" caucus of old guard DSA. "We believe DSA should be a national organization governed democratically and openly from the bottom up."
- Collective Power Network (CPN): Another formation that says it isn't a caucus but accomplishes basically the same goal. CPN similarly comprises some former DSA staffers, with supporters based largely in DC and New Orleans. CPN argues that DSA is limited in its appeal until it addresses organizational challenges. They have a federated vision for DSA, a stratified form of organization between local, regional and national. "The broad goal of building a mass organization of workers fighting for a democratic socialist society is seriously undermined by our current membership composition and lack of diversity."
- Libertarian Socialist Caucus (LSC): Anarchists, council communists and autonomist Marxists. Argues for abolishing the National Political Committee and shifting dues from National to locals. "…the Libertarian Socialist Caucus is suspicious of centralized forms of governance and decision making…Instead, we wish to promote the ability of individuals and communities to set their own priorities, both inside and outside the DSA. Governing authority is illegitimate in itself and can only be justified if it is delegated by and subordinated to a democratic assembly."
These are the resolutions the DSA are voting on:
Resolutions involving electoral politics can be subdivided as follows: prioritizing elections, 2020 election-related, and endorsement criteria. Given the role elections have played in bringing people into DSA, it's no surprise that there are multiple resolutions reaffirming DSA's commitment to running socialist candidates, again with perspectives by B&R (#31 "Class Struggle Elections"), SMC (#82 "DSA National Election Priority") and an old guard-type resolution (#13 "Defeating Trumpism and Electing Democratic Socialists and Progressives").
#13 "Defeating Trumpism" effectively argues for an 'Anyone But Trump' perspective, hoping to push the Democrats to the left, but supporting them against the Right regardless. SMC's #82 "National Election Priority" articulates the center position of being involved in electoral activity, prioritizing coalition work, having left aspirations but leaving it up to chapters to decide what minimum program is acceptable. #31 "Class Struggle Elections" (B&R) stakes out a left pole for electoral politics, putting forward a perspective of running as open socialists, using the office to build movements, and trying to build a "party within a party" to prepare along the lines of a "dirty break" – a strategy for building a new political party in the U.S. by operating in the Democratic Party and eventually taking gathered forces and 'breaking them off' to form the new party.
Apart from electoral strategy, #48 "Candidate Litmus Test" sets up a questionnaire that candidates must affirm completely for them to get a DSA endorsement, which is by far the most restrictive, but in its attachment to specific bills in Congress, I suspect it'll have too many limitations to pass. #52 "Not One Penny" sets a pledge that candidates for U.S. Congress must vote against militarism and all foreign military operations; I don't know the viability of this considering how the military is woven into nearly all federal budgets. No resolutions explicitly call for a break with the Democratic Party.
Two resolutions are aimed at DSA's orientation to Sanders. My own #15 is essentially a "Bernie or Bust" resolution, which accepts the decision DSA has already made in endorsing Sanders but rejects any other candidate should he lose. #39 "Petition Bernie Sanders for a People's Foreign Policy Platform" might be called the "No Tankies" resolution, aiming for DSA to try and push Sanders to have better international policies – importantly this contains language for solidarity with Palestine and Venezuela.
In sum: Elections? Yes. How should DSA do them? Within the Democratic Party. The minimums are going to have to be negotiated.
Here is a detailed summary of the DSA resolutions which were approved.
Individual resolutions:
In the event of a Sanders Loss
Not One Penny: Anti-militarist Discipline and Candidates Endorsements
Support for decriminalisation of sex work
Decolonisation, self determination, anti-imperialism
Support for Open Borders
Massive Strike for Reproductive Justice
And more.
Resolution analysis
Reports on what's going on inside the DSA and the internal struggles it faces in the world of Donald Trump.
and a rebuttal.
What say you, ERA? What's your opinion on what the DSA are doing at their convention.