Greed Island Mafia |OT|: *Insert joke here*
- Thread starter Fran
- Start date
By the director you mean donna not claiming? Or the player who gave donna and A the title? Because Donna did make a quick note about the director as soon as A mentioned it.
I can't tell if this is role fishing or genuine puzzle solving. Both?
But I stand by that it says nothing about either. Donna could be Scum and A was told a lie about her alignment. Donna could be Town and A is Scum who has to protect her. I don't think it's as clearing as people say it is.
still looking back
Who here would possibly think of a Role/Power that locks vote(s)? By the wording it says I'm "not allowed to move my vote", seems pretty clear-cut but maybe all this does is prevent us from voting against certain players?
Or maybe certain players voting against certain players? Not to mention it's Salva and me as the target(s), but why?
Well why for Salva; I think I get why somebody would do this to me specifically, probably
We clearly need to try and vote every single possible permutation towards solving this. Go down the list
UNVOTE: Blargonaut
VOTE: Royal_Flush
Salva help
Everybody get in on this
Who here would possibly think of a Role/Power that locks vote(s)? By the wording it says I'm "not allowed to move my vote", seems pretty clear-cut but maybe all this does is prevent us from voting against certain players?
Or maybe certain players voting against certain players? Not to mention it's Salva and me as the target(s), but why?
Well why for Salva; I think I get why somebody would do this to me specifically, probably
We clearly need to try and vote every single possible permutation towards solving this. Go down the list
UNVOTE: Blargonaut
VOTE: Royal_Flush
Salva help
Everybody get in on this
I think it pushes them to the side for later consideration but it sure would be nice if we had cop checks huh.
Anyway, I don't read it as fishing. That no one claimed means it's probably scum. If it's scum, it's probably not as cut and dried unless it just links two town together.
But the real question to me is: do you suspect Nat here? I really do not. Giving me a 100% shot would be a hell of a risky pocket move.
Yeah, the only thing we kinda know is that Donna gets all the benefits and A gets an extra burden over they actual role.
But if A was scum, and what A say is the truth, wouldn't scum A just kill Donna? A clearly said A just gets punished if Donna is lunched. But if Donna is killed, no risk at all.
Sorry, the role that gave the title. I don't know that it says much of anything about A and Donna.
I outright said earlier that if whoever was behind the role was town they should claim the role without providing additional details. But we have a weird, unexplained message that sounded vaguely ominous and no one is eager to take responsibility. That tells me it's probably no bueno.
Why would scum A kill Donna when they could just defend her and take her to f3?
OP
OP
I already told you that you can't change your vote. This is the final warning
Why start with Royal, who apparently is confirmed town by Sawnee? Also why move your vote when you know you can't move it?
Voting anyone right now is a risk. We don't know exactly how this vote lock works, if there are multiple targets to get locked, the more likely someone will get voted out with very few votes.
Also, I'm not sure it was me that was targeted, I got no notification other than when I tried to unvote, and then I got no notification when i could vote as normal again, I had to ask. If this role can target, say, you, stu and someone else, any votes on those 3 people would get locked. That is at least 3 useless votes.
I'm going down the list
I'm not going down the list
VOTE: Blargonaut
I think he means vote everybody one time.
Should I do it? I'd do it. Just go through the list and vote for everybody.
Also, I'm pretty sure this is a Scum power, especially since nobody claimed it. Which is good, because this seems pretty tame actually.
This is why, as much as I don't scumread Sneeks, I'm a little bothered by her yelling for a cop death and then fussing over whether or. If we should clear Donna and Aeleus. There's some level of inconsistency there but I'm probably just being paranoid now that only Blarg is being fun again.
Because they don't know what is the downside of lunching her. And protecting donna without a claim is almost as risky as trying to protect a scummate. If something goes wrong during the day and donna gets lunched then scum A would go down with her. And if this director ability leaked out somewhere along the way, like a last time effort to save donna, or even a mod redtext after donna is lunched, now everyone who tried to protect donna would look bad because they tried to save A through Donna.
Why worry about Donna not getting herself lunched when you can just kill her?
This is mostly why I'm leaning town on A right now. Is heavy heavy speculation, as usual for me, but I'm trying hard to make sense of this role.
The fact is, this benefits Donna and perjudicates A, as long as it works as it says.
Going down the list:
vote: Blargonaut
I'm going at a pace of one vote per minute to give Fran time to react
vote: Blargonaut
I'm going at a pace of one vote per minute to give Fran time to react
Going down the list:
vote: Muffin
Does anybody know if I'm allowed to vote for dead players? Like, in general?
vote: Muffin
Does anybody know if I'm allowed to vote for dead players? Like, in general?
Going down the list:
vote: nin
vote: nin
I mean, mine are pretty easy to ignore. Blarg and I-forgot-who on the other hand...
At least we got that sweet ITA data. I'll put the final list of that together and bookmark it so I have it handy in the future.
Going down the list:
vote: malus
vote: malus
Everybody but you and Monkey did have a 0% chance, right? You had this just for the data?
This show was better when it was fictionalized history and I didn't have to watch nutty ass disregard for science happen in a worse way in real time. :(