Yeah I wouldn't be surprised if some people do think like this. But I can't really believe that a meeting like this happened and they just let him write about it.
They have no legal leverage to stop him.
What would this nda even legally be about?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.fo...ey-elements-of-non-disclosure-agreements/amp/
These aren't confidential business dealings, they paid him money to be a consultant, not to keep his mouth shut about a situation or thing they did.
What valuable business information do they legally have the right to protect with an nda?
They got nothing.
Rushkov on the other hand, COULD consider the information advice and consultations he provided priviledged and confidential information.
It is after all, how he makes his living, what goes in his books, and the very reason he's asked to do these consultations, he's the subject matter expert, on what they want to know.
Last edited: