Are you looking for a job or souls to trade ?
I thought it was perfect
I'm sorry but if you're a Trump supporter at THIS point in time, after all the evidence that Trump himself is at best an egotistical idiotic racist sympathizer and at worst (most likely worst) a fascist and bigot...I find it interesting that people readily equate Trump supporters with Nazis, racists, and idiots, rather than , say, the disenfranchised and ignored working classes .
Racists don't need to "talk about politics" to cause problems in the workplace. It's nice that they're managing to keep their hatred quiet in your workplace though I guess?Most people try not to talk about politics at work and go about their day. I'm sure where I work now there are Trump supporters, but no one talks about politics and we all get along.
Is the endgame full unemployment for all Trump supporters, or that they only work at places owned by other Trump supporters?Racists don't need to "talk about politics" to cause problems in the workplace. It's nice that they're managing to keep their hatred quiet in your workplace though I guess?
Is the endgame full unemployment for all Trump supporters, or that they only work at places owned by other Trump supporters?
If a Trump supporter is capable of hiding their racism/bigotry and working with other employees of different ethnicities/genders/sexualities then sure, whatever they should be hired. That's all usually very easy to catch in interview process & probation period however.Is the endgame full unemployment for all Trump supporters, or that they only work at places owned by other Trump supporters?
Racists don't need to "talk about politics" to cause problems in the workplace. It's nice that they're managing to keep their hatred quiet in your workplace though I guess?
Is the endgame full unemployment for all Trump supporters, or that they only work at places owned by other Trump supporters?
I just asked an honest question. I never said anything was valid or invalid.Are you playing a game
Bigotry, poor critical thinking skills and an inability to process information are perfectly valid reasons not to hire someone.
Sometimes we just have to breaks laws for the greater good.In some states this is illegal actually. Discriminating based on political beliefs.
Key phrasing is not about asking, but making your decision on that knowledge. That is illegal in NY and California if I recall.
I like the cut of your gib. Put up pride flags in June, Mexico flags for Cinco de Mayo, have feminist art decorating the office. leave copies of Das Kapital around.... really fuck with his head.No.
But if I did I'd mess around and do things so they're miserable.
That'd be pretty tough unless it's a solo job. Most jobs require working with others and how well they would work with the rest of the team.
Unless the rest of the team are straight white men that kinda rules out a Trump supporter ever being "best person for the job."
Wouldn't it be pretty simple to weed out Trumpists by asking questions requiring basic logic (at which they will fail)?I like how deciding not to hire a person because of obvious character flaws and a lack of intelligence is now "breaking the law"
Lmao. This is really good. Here's an example of a disenfranchised working class voterI find it interesting that people readily equate Trump supporters with Nazis, racists, and idiots, rather than , say, the disenfranchised and ignored working classes .
I find it interesting that people readily equate Trump supporters with Nazis, racists, and idiots, rather than , say, the disenfranchised and ignored working classes .
Shit should be illegal in every state. Employers discriminating against political beliefs/party affiliation/etc is absolutely disgusting.In some states this is illegal actually. Discriminating based on political beliefs.
Key phrasing is not about asking, but making your decision on that knowledge. That is illegal in NY and California if I recall.
I'm betting if you have any minorities on your team they probably feel differently.I am in charge of hiring new personnel at my work. People are hired due to the merits of their skills, not for any other reason, political or otherwise. Anyone in the position of hiring should know better than to discriminate for any reason.
Our staff is made up of all sorts of people, some love the president, others don't but in the end, we all get along and make a great team.
Wouldn't it be pretty simple to weed out Trumpists by asking questions requiring basic logic (at which they will fail)?
The disenfranchised and ignored working class are being disenfranchised, ignored, and harmed by Trump. His shitty trade wars. His lack of economic initiatives to resurrect these communities. His failure to do anything to address the opioid crisis other than signing a proclamation declaring it as an emergency.I find it interesting that people readily equate Trump supporters with Nazis, racists, and idiots, rather than , say, the disenfranchised and ignored working classes .
Wouldn't it be pretty simple to weed out Trumpists by asking questions requiring basic logic (at which they will fail)?
So is being a Trump supporter. * shrug *Shit should be illegal in every state. Employers discriminating against political beliefs/party affiliation/etc is absolutely disgusting.
I've worked with both stark feminists and literal nazis, and aside from political debate, some of them were fine people. When you engage in talks with them, it quickly becomes obvious why they are the way they are.
Which is why I hate to see push for further divide in this thread. Don't write people off for their political views.
The disenfranchised and ignored working class are being disenfranchised, ignored, and harmed by Trump. His shitty trade wars. His lack of economic initiatives to resurrect these communities. His failure to do anything to address the opioid crisis other than signing a proclamation declaring it as an emergency.
It's too bad there aren't candidates that propose economic stimulus for these communities, retraining, public works programs, and treating addiction using proven and safe methods. Oh wait, there are, but they're all democrats and aren't lying to these people's faces about how their back-breaking and mesothelioma-inducing mining jobs are going to be just fine.
"Disenfranchised"? Have you been following which groups' votes are being most actively suppressed in this country?
Trump voters are either racists or not bothered by racists. Its really as simple as that. Are you even American?I'll try to let this be my last posting in this thread, but I have to say: This is such a baffeling, ignorant attitude.
You're saying that ALL people who voted for the other of two relevant parties are the same. Do you not realize how that's exactly what fascists do? Dehumanize people, get rid of the individual value, only comprehend 'them' as a group. Now you'll reply 'but they dehumanize others!', but even if it were true, you're doing the exact same thing right now. But og course you're wrong. People are individuals and act as such, therefore you ought to look at them as such. I've worked with both stark feminists and literal nazis, and aside from political debate, some of them were fine people. When you engage in talks with them, it quickly becomes obvious why they are the way they are.
Which is why I hate to see push for further divide in this thread. Don't write people off for their political views.
But if you do: Don't talk, fight.
I just thought of an even simpler way, just ask if they prefer Obama-Care or the Affordable Care Act. Or if they support bombing Agrabah.Depending on the field, one might find that a higher functioning Trump supporter might be able to fudge a significant part of written/objective testing but the signs would inevitably show during any follow up processes such as the interview or social media check.
Spoiler: They aren't.
The endgame is for Trump supporters to realize there are consequences for their actions and think about making a change in their lives. If it takes denying them a job or whatever else, it's worth it.Is the endgame full unemployment for all Trump supporters, or that they only work at places owned by other Trump supporters?
Let's start with the data. According to exit polls, Hillary Clinton won by 12 points among voters making less than $30,000 a year—53% to Trump's 41% —and by 9 points among people making between $30,000 and $49,999. Trump's support was the inverse. He won every group making $50,000 or more—albeit by smaller margins.
This is consistent with analysis of exit polls from the primary, which found that the median household income of Trump voters—about $72,000—was significantly higher than the median household income of the country as a whole—about $56,000. It was also higher than that of the average Clinton and Sanders voters—about $61,000 each.
Even among white voters—who were more likely to support Trump than other groups—Trump did better among middle income white voters than low-income ones. And a closer look reveals that the swing towards Trump was a lot bigger based on education, rather than income.
No of course I wouldn't employ a trumper. same with a bernie bro. if you're alt right or suffering """"economic anxiety"""" you won't work for me.
While I can't tell you what thoughts go on in any of the employees heads, I can tell you, friendships have been forged between those that voted differently, and or have a different skin color among our staff. We're like a big family.I'm betting if you have any minorities on your team they probably feel differently.
I'm black and work in infosec with a Jewish boss. You'd have to be the most undercover Trump supporter to hide it from me and I'd absolutely stamp any paperwork for "do not hire ever" as "culture fit issues" just like they do for black people that dare to come into interviews with natural hair.