• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

luca

Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,550
I'm actually slightly disappointed by Ant-Man and the Wasp. It was such a huge step-down from the original Ant-Man. And I almost want a shake-up in the writer's room.
Hopefully it still does decently at the Box Office.
 
OP
OP
kswiston

kswiston

Member
Oct 24, 2017
3,693
I'm really interested to see how big a boost the inevitable Dr. Strange 2 gets. Especially after him being such a focal point of Infinity War.

It will probably depend if it any of that follows through to Doc Strange 2. If it's off doing its own thing like Ant-Man and the Wasp seems to be doing, the bump might not be all that large.
 

berzeli

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,384
THR was just wrong. The film opened on a Thursday. The previews were before that in limited venues in said cities.

Saturday and Sunday were both over $57M, topping the equivalent days for WW2. Audience reviews are extremely strong (and people in China actually follow those, as opposed to here where it's just fanboy wars).

EDIT: but it does look like I misremembered the preview total prior to Thursday. It was closer to $25M.
Ugh, why is Chinese box office reporting so constantly riddled with errors? (this is rhetorical, I do actually know why)

But yeah, taking another look at more accurate numbers, it is posting some insane figures.
 

Heart_Attack

Banned
Nov 1, 2017
2,442
Not surprised that Ant man had an OK opening weekend. The only reason me and most people I know that went to see it was mainly to see how it connects to Infinity War. Both Ant Man movies are some of the weakest Marvel movies. They feel like a made for TV pilot with a 100+ Million Budget.
 
OP
OP
kswiston

kswiston

Member
Oct 24, 2017
3,693
Suffering for the same reasons Solo did, most likely. Despite being good, no one was really asking for it and hit during a lull in a string of real heavy hitters.

The difference being that Ant-Man cost about 55% of Solo, and will make a couple hundred million more worldwide. Ant-Man and the Wasp isn't really suffering. B-tier Marvel makes cash because those films come with B-tier price tags. Solo was a $300M film. Ditto with Justice League.
 

Jiggy

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,306
wherever
I guess Ant-Man 3 is definitely on the backburner for Marvel projects in the future. Right behind Black Widow, The Eternals, reboots for X-Men and the Fantastic Four, and all the eventual sequels for Dr. Strange, Black Panther, and Captain Marvel.

I think we still get Ant-Man 3, they probably just shove in some Marvel cameos like Spidey or Strange or something
 

The Adder

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,178
The difference being that Ant-Man cost about 55% of Solo, and will make a couple hundred million more worldwide. Ant-Man and the Wasp isn't really suffering. B-tier Marvel makes cash because those films come with B-tier price tags. Solo was a $300M film. Ditto with Justice League.
This is entirely irrelevant to the point I was making about WHY it is performing the way it is.
 

J_Viper

Member
Oct 25, 2017
25,750
I enjoyed the first Ant-Man quite a bit, but this one looked way too fucking goofy.

I'm sure it'll still make a decent profit though.
 

mreddie

Member
Oct 26, 2017
44,308
The difference being that Ant-Man cost about 55% of Solo, and will make a couple hundred million more worldwide. Ant-Man and the Wasp isn't really suffering. B-tier Marvel makes cash because those films come with B-tier price tags. Solo was a $300M film. Ditto with Justice League.
I think people assumed Antman/Wasp would get that bump from both Wars. It did but I think it would have helped had it come out in August. I'm shocked Disney didn't do that here.
 

Deleted member 5666

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,753
Yep. Solo costing over 300 mil and Ant Man costing 160m is why around 85m opening for Solo is a disaster and around 75m for Ant Man is fine.
 

Slayven

Never read a comic in his life
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
93,313
White Male lead films are really under performing
 

Hyun Sai

Member
Oct 27, 2017
14,562
Like many I think, I saw the first Ant Man because of the connected MCU, not because I was interested in the character. People thought the the airport fight in CW would give him a boost, but I didn't understand why.

I will see the sequel for the same reason I saw the first one.
 

Prompto

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,993
Damn I figured Ant-Man would open above at least 90 million after that preview number. Still not bad at all for it though
 
Oct 25, 2017
16,738
Like many I think, I saw the first Ant Man because of the connected MCU, not because I was interested in the character. People thought the the airport fight in CW would give him a boost, but I didn't understand why.

I will see the sequel for the same reason I saw the first one.

I'm seeing it this Tuesday. But I also feel coming off of IW people probably don't truly feel the need to watch this.
 

mreddie

Member
Oct 26, 2017
44,308
Like many I think, I saw the first Ant Man because of the connected MCU, not because I was interested in the character. People thought the the airport fight in CW would give him a boost, but I didn't understand why.

I will see the sequel for the same reason I saw the first one.
Timing most likely. Granted the timing between Avengers and Antman is the same as last time with a Jurassic in between! I think the ending of IW took the sails off of things though plus Incredibles 2
 

Aaron Stack

Banned
Nov 13, 2017
1,557
I can't tell who is genuinely trying to portray an ant man sequel doing better than the original as a failure and who is just fucking around.
 

Bronx-Man

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
15,351
This is probably the weirdest case of front-loading an MCU movie's had since Civil War.
 

BobLoblaw

This Guy Helps
Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,340
It's weird seeing a sub-$100 million Marvel movie. If there's a third one (as opposed to Ant-man being another Hulk-type guest character), another popular character would probably be required.
 

mreddie

Member
Oct 26, 2017
44,308
Everyone is saving their money for Venom.
giphy.gif
 

Benji

Self Requested Ban
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,114
Ant-Man is basically exactly where I predicted it would be and going to be fine profit wise. The doom and gloom in here is really weird
 

Bronx-Man

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
15,351
Saturday increases were poor across the board. Friday still had some July 4th vacation padding.
Oh, that's pretty understandable then. Guess they should've launched this in August.

It's weird seeing a sub-$100 million Marvel movie. If there's a third one (as opposed to Ant-man being another Hulk-type guest character), another popular character would probably be required.
Spidey or Dr. Strange with Taskmaster as main villain could do the trick.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.