I do wonder how many are actually being genuine rather than using it as a reason to haul out the pitch forks against Sony.
lmfao, it blows my mind people actually think of this.^^^^
I do wonder how many are actually being genuine rather than using it as a reason to haul out the pitch forks against Sony.
Why aren't you down with the "fuck Sony"? This primarily affects their customers and they're perfectly fine with fucking all of us.
Dunno if this one was posted yet
https://www.polygon.com/2018/7/2/17526896/sony-fallout-76-cross-platform-fortnite-minecraft
How much is Sony willing to get hurt to keep people apart?
This is going to keep happening
There is a platform holder called Sony
whose stance on cross-play is baloney.
So we're raising a stink
hoping people might think
whilst others accuse us of being so phoney.
#myballsareinsonyscourt
If I asked you during what was arguably the height of Xbox popularity; the 360 years until the Kinect who the most important, most cherished developer in the entire Xbox brand was, you would probably answer Bungie, and I am sure even MS would agree. However, by contract they were 'forced' to create Halo after Halo after Halo to the point where they said: enough is enough. To think they would chose Activision over MS is telling enough, especially with Activision proudly proclaiming: "10 years of Destiny!!". Still, they chose that over MS.
What happened to Bungie happened to many other developers under MS. The 'fable' team got fed up and disbanded after losing many important staff. Most left Rare as well, and so on.
Compare this to Naught Dog, who after creating Jak and Daxter were allowed to create an entire new franchise; Uncharted which was a massive success. Even then there were given the freedom to create The Last of Us.
Killzone titles were really profitable, but Guerrilla got fed up with making only 1 franchise, so the next title would not be another Killzone, but an entire new IP, set in a futuristic world with enemies unlike anything seen before, with a female protagonist, a ginger one at that.
Do you understand that were these studios under MS; HZD, the Last of Us, Uncharted, the GOW reboot, and many other titles which are loved by millions worldwide would have never even existed?
MS has studios dedicated entirely to only 1 franchise.
This is also good btw; many people love Fable, Gears of War, Halo and Forza. Those titles are why people stuck with MS, and bought an Xbox One in 2013 and the following years... The most expensive, least powerful system. But still, the Halo and Fable system. That was enough for millions of people.
I realise what Sony is doing though;
-like the cross progression thing which they think makes them money in the long run
-creating 'game of the year- bait', year after year (multiple times a year even), supporting the most creative projects, is only because that makes them money in the long run.
While I applauded the use of a female, non sexualised, ginger, protagonist; I now realise (also thanks to you guys) that Sony is only in it for the money.
Horizon Zero Dawn would have starred a bald Gears-esque space marine, going back in time to kill Obama if that concept made Sony more money.
I guess every company is after our money, but with the cross play thing; MS at least is the most honest about our money.
And Sony needs to be stopped with the practices, I agree. While I personally love the GOTY-bait over MS' efforts, the cross progression shows what Sony is willing to do to get more and more money.
With that kind of Sony, there might actually one day be a game where I have to go back in time as a right wing character to kill Obama, the mere thought of that just sickens me.
I see the need to send out a clear signal to Sony. I won't buy any multiplatform games on PlayStation anymore. I will try to use the PC version or the Switch. At least those are more honest companies. They would never take hostage cross progression.
It's hard to take your posts seriously when you suggest Sony would make a game to kill Obama, due to greed.It is not a troll. Do you think Sony will stop at cross progression?
We now know what Sony will do if they are in the lead. I would suggest you switch to a non-Sony platform next generation.
We need MS to be competitive again, Nintendo also. If there was balance then Sony would not behave like this.
Last generation when Xbox and Playstation were 1:1, Sony SUGGESTED cross play with MS.
Nowadays with a clear 2:1 lead? They are even taking hostage cross progression.
What will they do next?
I fully endorse people switching to other platforms, as only that will create balance, and if Sony loses money, maybe they will come to their senses
That is an extreme example,It's hard to take your posts seriously when you suggest Sony would make a game to kill Obama, due to greed.
That is an extreme example,
Merely to contrast the forward thinking games like HZD with a non sexualized, independent woman.
People might love Sony for that, as I did myself, but greed is ultimately what drives Sony, not ethics.
Which is why the worst possible, most vile game, going back in time to kill a Nobel prize winner for Peace, could also be on the table of that brought in more money.
Make no mistake Sony is built on corporate greed and money, ethics are just a product for them, easily replaced by more profitable products, like charging for BC games people already own multiple times, or holding accounts hostage as demonstrated in this thread
If I asked you during what was arguably the height of Xbox popularity; the 360 years until the Kinect who the most important, most cherished developer in the entire Xbox brand was, you would probably answer Bungie, and I am sure even MS would agree. However, by contract they were 'forced' to create Halo after Halo after Halo to the point where they said: enough is enough. To think they would chose Activision over MS is telling enough, especially with Activision proudly proclaiming: "10 years of Destiny!!". Still, they chose that over MS.
What happened to Bungie happened to many other developers under MS. The 'fable' team got fed up and disbanded after losing many important staff. Most left Rare as well, and so on.
Compare this to Naught Dog, who after creating Jak and Daxter were allowed to create an entire new franchise; Uncharted which was a massive success. Even then there were given the freedom to create The Last of Us.
Killzone titles were really profitable, but Guerrilla got fed up with making only 1 franchise, so the next title would not be another Killzone, but an entire new IP, set in a futuristic world with enemies unlike anything seen before, with a female protagonist, a ginger one at that.
Do you understand that were these studios under MS; HZD, the Last of Us, Uncharted, the GOW reboot, and many other titles which are loved by millions worldwide would have never even existed?
MS has studios dedicated entirely to only 1 franchise.
This is also good btw; many people love Fable, Gears of War, Halo and Forza. Those titles are why people stuck with MS, and bought an Xbox One in 2013 and the following years... The most expensive, least powerful system. But still, the Halo and Fable system. That was enough for millions of people.
I realise what Sony is doing though;
-like the cross progression thing which they think makes them money in the long run
-creating 'game of the year- bait', year after year (multiple times a year even), supporting the most creative projects, is only because that makes them money in the long run.
While I applauded the use of a female, non sexualised, ginger, protagonist; I now realise (also thanks to you guys) that Sony is only in it for the money.
Horizon Zero Dawn would have starred a bald Gears-esque space marine, going back in time to kill Obama if that concept made Sony more money.
I guess every company is after our money, but with the cross play thing; MS at least is the most honest about our money.
And Sony needs to be stopped with the practices, I agree. While I personally love the GOTY-bait over MS' efforts, the cross progression shows what Sony is willing to do to get more and more money.
With that kind of Sony, there might actually one day be a game where I have to go back in time as a right wing character to kill Obama, the mere thought of that just sickens me.
I see the need to send out a clear signal to Sony. I won't buy any multiplatform games on PlayStation anymore. I will try to use the PC version or the Switch. At least those are more honest companies. They would never take hostage cross progression.
Lol, apparently someone who had too much coffee and the winner of the 'Worse analogy of the week award"
I'm not down with the "Fuck Sony" movement. I have gladly recognized this account block as fucked up. But me screaming "Fuck Sony" isn't going to solve anything. I'm still going to Buy ps5, most if not all of their 1st party games, +, etc. Even back at the old site I didn't go "Fuck MS", while everyone else was.
Besides most of it, is mocking others for their opinions (which I absolutely abhor).
Me and my bud (GameStop manager) was just talking about this. Frankly, I understand that Fortnite is a phenomenon. But my position/ stance is (while the game has grown on me) Fortnite feels like the beginning of the end of traditional gaming as a whole and for that I hate it, but I understand. He says that most of the kids these days just come in to buy money cards; psn, iOS, Xbox, eshop.. all of em. This trend is just gonna spawn more and more of these games.
My opinion, now, is console Xplay/ console Xprogession is new territory for everybody, even for MS and Nintendo. It's only a matter of time before Sony gives in, they have too.
But for right now, im just too invested into psn to throw it away. I go all in on things I want, i didn't buy an Xbox until I was able to buy the console plus all the exclusives and gold.
And, I am not fake on here. Everything I say about myself is thruth, no hypotheticals and lies about what may happen if this were the case BS. I like all systems and for that this hasn't hurt that much. But for the people it did I "empathize" and hope they find a solution soon.
If I asked you during what was arguably the height of Xbox popularity; the 360 years until the Kinect who the most important, most cherished developer in the entire Xbox brand was, you would probably answer Bungie, and I am sure even MS would agree. However, by contract they were 'forced' to create Halo after Halo after Halo to the point where they said: enough is enough. To think they would chose Activision over MS is telling enough, especially with Activision proudly proclaiming: "10 years of Destiny!!". Still, they chose that over MS.
What happened to Bungie happened to many other developers under MS. The 'fable' team got fed up and disbanded after losing many important staff. Most left Rare as well, and so on.
Compare this to Naught Dog, who after creating Jak and Daxter were allowed to create an entire new franchise; Uncharted which was a massive success. Even then there were given the freedom to create The Last of Us.
Killzone titles were really profitable, but Guerrilla got fed up with making only 1 franchise, so the next title would not be another Killzone, but an entire new IP, set in a futuristic world with enemies unlike anything seen before, with a female protagonist, a ginger one at that.
Do you understand that were these studios under MS; HZD, the Last of Us, Uncharted, the GOW reboot, and many other titles which are loved by millions worldwide would have never even existed?
MS has studios dedicated entirely to only 1 franchise.
This is also good btw; many people love Fable, Gears of War, Halo and Forza. Those titles are why people stuck with MS, and bought an Xbox One in 2013 and the following years... The most expensive, least powerful system. But still, the Halo and Fable system. That was enough for millions of people.
I realise what Sony is doing though;
-like the cross progression thing which they think makes them money in the long run
-creating 'game of the year- bait', year after year (multiple times a year even), supporting the most creative projects, is only because that makes them money in the long run.
While I applauded the use of a female, non sexualised, ginger, protagonist; I now realise (also thanks to you guys) that Sony is only in it for the money.
Horizon Zero Dawn would have starred a bald Gears-esque space marine, going back in time to kill Obama if that concept made Sony more money.
I guess every company is after our money, but with the cross play thing; MS at least is the most honest about our money.
And Sony needs to be stopped with the practices, I agree. While I personally love the GOTY-bait over MS' efforts, the cross progression shows what Sony is willing to do to get more and more money.
With that kind of Sony, there might actually one day be a game where I have to go back in time as a right wing character to kill Obama, the mere thought of that just sickens me.
I see the need to send out a clear signal to Sony. I won't buy any multiplatform games on PlayStation anymore. I will try to use the PC version or the Switch. At least those are more honest companies. They would never take hostage cross progression.
Lol, apparently someone who had too much coffee and the winner of the 'Worse analogy of the week award"
You have to realise people were actually affected by this in terms of the account lock, unlike with MS where their shitty plan that didn't go into effect. That's why people are really unhappy over Sony. They've taken ownership of things we've bought elsewhere and are now telling us we can't use those purchases where we want to.I'm not down with the "Fuck Sony" movement. I have gladly recognized this account block as fucked up. But me screaming "Fuck Sony" isn't going to solve anything. I'm still going to Buy ps5, most if not all of their 1st party games, +, etc. Even back at the old site I didn't go "Fuck MS", while everyone else was.
Besides most of it, is mocking others for their opinions (which I absolutely abhor).
I'm also not in the 'screw Sony' camp, at least not in a serious long term capacity. It's really easy to say that in the heat of any given moment – hell, I'm guilty of it myself – but long term, we need Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo. Each of these companies have some serious positives, as well as serious faults. If they didn't exist, there wouldn't be any competition, and without competition, we wouldn't see such wonderful things happen.
As far as being invested in a platform this late in the game though, that's understandable. However, I've never been a digital copy kind of guy, so I don't really have anything invested. I prefer physical copies, and on that front, Microsoft is on point. It really is having me sort of pre-decide that next -gen, my first console choice will likely be the Xbox 'Scarlet'. If Sony goes all in and allows backwards compatibility with PS3 and PS4 and whatnot, then maybe I'll have an actual decision to consider, but as of now, Sony's harmful choices and their refusal to do any sort of backwards compatibility on their platform forces my hand.
Gaming trends as of late… I tend to agree with you and what Fortnite is doing for the landscape. I mean, Fortnite isn't the problem… it's just an evolution of it, right? This 'mobile gaming' business model has existed for a long time and noooooobody took the concern of 'mobile gaming will one day flood over into console gaming' seriously… and now here we are. Fortnite is basically a mobile game that's meant to be played on PC and consoles. And that's the kind of stuff my son likes to play… outside of Minecraft, he's really big on Roblox, which is more a gaming platform than a game, and there's a ton of ways to waste real world money on stuff for your character's avatar or for perks in the games the platform hosts. And you know what the sad part is? Because kids spend more time playing that stuff than playing with physical toys, the investment, financially, seems to make a lot of sense. They'll use those character skins way longer than they'll use a toy, you know?
It's going to be really interesting to see what happens now. Everyone in the industry pushed all the abusive business models to the brink and now there's thread after thread and story after story of backlash and political involvement, etc. We're currently in Deadwood as it's on the verge of being placed under political control, just like everywhere else in the country. The wild west is slowly, but surely coming to an end. Of course, that makes way for new frontiers to be forged and explored… some for good, some for bad. Such is the story of business, I guess.
every time this thread appears I ask myself if there is some new information and when I get here all I see e expeculation and someone banned.
every time this thread appears I ask myself if there is some new information and when I get here all I see e expeculation and someone banned.
Yep. Pretty much. Maybe everyone needs to chill until we get more news. When threads become so back and forth like this, they are not helpful. They just bring out the worst in people.every time this thread appears I ask myself if there is some new information and when I get here all I see e expeculation and someone banned.
Senior executive officer Susumu Tanaka said during a recent shareholder meeting that generally speaking Nintendo is enthusiastic about allowing cross-play with Nintendo Switch and other competing platforms. However, Tanaka acknowledged that all parties have to come to an agreement, and this can be a sticking point.
"Crossplay basically comes about from conversations between publishers and platform holders," Tanaka said. "We are inclined to do what we can to help publishers incorporate crossplay when that is what they want. The other parties involved also have a say in whether we are able to reach this outcome or not, so we will continue to discuss it with them."
Yep. Pretty much. Maybe everyone needs to chill until we get more news. When threads become so back and forth like this, they are not helpful. They just bring out the worst in people.
Their drive is always at least partially money, as a company, but as individuals most of them strive to create when we're talking about game studios. But none of that post had anything to do with anything in this thread. It was just an insane acid trip of a post down the journey of discovering that companies like money.I am all into Sony ecosystem and Sony games, and have been a loyal fan of PlayStation since the PlayStation 2. Even so that post makes a lot of sense.
If not money, what is their drive?
I think, and I might be wrong, that there's maybe a few different lines of thinking related to what 'Fuck Sony' means. I've never seen it as some big boycott whenever someone's said it. I would gladly say Fuck Sony related to this issue. They can fuck right off, they're wrong. That doesn't mean I'm not buying a PS5 and it doesn't mean I'm selling my PS4. But still, fuck Sony. I think it's just a strong way of saying I disagree with them. A bit tongue in cheek maybe? Dunno.
Lol, apparently someone who had too much coffee and the winner of the 'Worse analogy of the week award"
I am all into Sony ecosystem and Sony games, and have been a loyal fan of PlayStation since the PlayStation 2. Even so that post makes a lot of sense.
If not money, what is their drive?
With that kind of Sony, there might actually one day be a game where I have to go back in time as a right wing character to kill Obama, the mere thought of that just sickens me.
Great post. I completely understand and I will probably be getting both systems day one, ps5 and xbox2.I'm also not in the 'screw Sony' camp, at least not in a serious long term capacity. It's really easy to say that in the heat of any given moment – hell, I'm guilty of it myself – but long term, we need Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo. Each of these companies have some serious positives, as well as serious faults. If they didn't exist, there wouldn't be any competition, and without competition, we wouldn't see such wonderful things happen.
As far as being invested in a platform this late in the game though, that's understandable. However, I've never been a digital copy kind of guy, so I don't really have anything invested. I prefer physical copies, and on that front, Microsoft is on point. It really is having me sort of pre-decide that next -gen, my first console choice will likely be the Xbox 'Scarlet'. If Sony goes all in and allows backwards compatibility with PS3 and PS4 and whatnot, then maybe I'll have an actual decision to consider, but as of now, Sony's harmful choices and their refusal to do any sort of backwards compatibility on their platform forces my hand.
Gaming trends as of late… I tend to agree with you and what Fortnite is doing for the landscape. I mean, Fortnite isn't the problem… it's just an evolution of it, right? This 'mobile gaming' business model has existed for a long time and noooooobody took the concern of 'mobile gaming will one day flood over into console gaming' seriously… and now here we are. Fortnite is basically a mobile game that's meant to be played on PC and consoles. And that's the kind of stuff my son likes to play… outside of Minecraft, he's really big on Roblox, which is more a gaming platform than a game, and there's a ton of ways to waste real world money on stuff for your character's avatar or for perks in the games the platform hosts. And you know what the sad part is? Because kids spend more time playing that stuff than playing with physical toys, the investment, financially, seems to make a lot of sense. They'll use those character skins way longer than they'll use a toy, you know?
It's going to be really interesting to see what happens now. Everyone in the industry pushed all the abusive business models to the brink and now there's thread after thread and story after story of backlash and political involvement, etc. We're currently in Deadwood as it's on the verge of being placed under political control, just like everywhere else in the country. The wild west is slowly, but surely coming to an end. Of course, that makes way for new frontiers to be forged and explored… some for good, some for bad. Such is the story of business, I guess.
I totally understand that.You have to realise people were actually affected by this in terms of the account lock, unlike with MS where their shitty plan that didn't go into effect. That's why people are really unhappy over Sony. They've taken ownership of things we've bought elsewhere and are now telling us we can't use those purchases where we want to.
I was really pissed at the time because of it. I was basically going on a trip not long after the Switch version came out, and because I dared try the PS4 version at some point I can't take advantage of any of my PC purchases on the Switch to enjoy while I'm away. That's fucked up, and that's why people were saying fuck Sony etc. Like if something affects you personally in a fucked up way, you're obviously going to be very annoyed at the perpetrator. Which in this case is Sony.
Logic doesn't play into anything when it comes to things like this.
You have to realise people were actually affected by this in terms of the account lock, unlike with MS where their shitty plan that didn't go into effect. That's why people are really unhappy over Sony. They've taken ownership of things we've bought elsewhere and are now telling us we can't use those purchases where we want to.
I was really pissed at the time because of it. I was basically going on a trip not long after the Switch version came out, and because I dared try the PS4 version at some point I can't take advantage of any of my PC purchases on the Switch to enjoy while I'm away. That's fucked up, and that's why people were saying fuck Sony etc. Like if something affects you personally in a fucked up way, you're obviously going to be very annoyed at the perpetrator. Which in this case is Sony.
Logic doesn't play into anything when it comes to things like this.
You said all that without reading. He quoted me and neither him or I said nothing that you suggested. As a matter of fact, I said the opposite, saying "I didn't go Fuck MS in 2013". As far as I can see, nobody on the last couple pages even remotely gave Sony a pass, so..People are still angry at MS for plans they never actually put fourth on the public 5 years ago and reversed after feedback but yet Sony gets a free pass for anti consumer policies they have actually enforced now on their user base. Also apparently because MS had an issue once a long time ago with FF14 crossplay it means they can never change their mind after a complete leadership over haul at MS.
Side question. Was the "For The Gamers" an official Sony slogan for this generation or just some one off quote the media latched onto? How downright hypocritical if it's still in use.
Common Sony, do the right thing!
Yep. Pretty much. Maybe everyone needs to chill until we get more news. When threads become so back and forth like this, they are not helpful. They just bring out the worst in people.
Side question. Was the "For The Gamers" an official Sony slogan for this generation or just some one off quote the media latched onto? How downright hypocritical if it's still in use.
Common Sony, do the right thing!
I've had tons of fun nights with friends doing private matches cross platform, it'll definitely get a lot better when we can party up and queue thoI actually didn't know Xbox/Switch Rocket League crossplay wasn't in effect yet.
It's coming soon this summer apparently. Thought it was there at Switch's launch.
I actually didn't know Xbox/Switch Rocket League crossplay wasn't in effect yet.
It's coming soon this summer apparently. Thought it was there at Switch's launch.
Jup, the current commercials still end with the 4theplayers slogan on screen and the narrator. At least here in Europe.I'm pretty sure many PS4 commercials still end with the narrator saying "This is for the players."
The "freedom to play anytime, anywhere" part is especially ironic considering where we currently are.
Jup, the current commercials still end with the 4theplayers slogan on screen and the narrator. At least here in Europe.
The "freedom to play anytime, anywhere" part is especially ironic considering where we currently are.
Why am I leaving my Fortnite account behind? The account that I've poured time, money and effort into? The answer is simple: I own a Nintendo Switch. And a Nintendo Switch would be a great way for me to play this game on the go when I'm looking for a bit more of an involved experience than what I can get on mobile. But my account is tainted as far as the Switch--or the Xbox One--is concerned. I've used it to play on PS4, and that means that I can't ever use it on the Switch due to Sony's hardline approach to cross-play and cross-progression.
Cross-progression is one of the most impressive things about Fortnite: Battle Royale. I can play on the same account an unlock rewards whether I'm on my PS4, my PC, or my phone, which are my three main platforms as of right now. But now I'll be replacing the PS4 side of that equation with Xbox One and Switch: a superior setup, but one that will require me to use my alternate account.
Only affecting the biggest game in the world right now... meaning the likelihood of Sony doing the same thing to other games down the line are sky high.
Not to mention PS4 users missed out on the Minecraft better together and HD graphics updates, all because of Sony refusing to allow cross play.
Sorry, what's this in reference too?Wow, I can't believe that just happened. Feels like a mistake.
I bought a PS4 for with the promise of great first party games.
We just got GoW which was GotG and I'm looking forward to Spiderman.
If you are on about cross play with Xbox it doesn't affect me and Don't hasn't mislead me as I can't remember they proposed cross play with Xbox when they marketed the PS4. Though I remember Microsoft proposed Kinect is key to Xbox and most games will use Kinect and they changed their mind. So in terms of selling a product with nothing misleading and not backtracking Sony has kept their promise and their support for PS4 has been great in terms of first party. The only thing that annoys me is when Sony bumped up the price of PSN. Xbox also annoys me that they still charge for Gold for F2P games but I won't hate as they were striaght forward with this when they sold the Xbox.
So instead of people complaining about cross play feature with Xbox which Sony has never proposed or advertised. Why not buy as systems that has cross play and sell the PS4. It's like me complaining my Microwave doesn't have a grill function when before I bought it it clearly had no feature stated on the box it has a grill function. I won't be screaming and shouting about the microwave I have worse comes to worse if I really needed the feature I'd get rid of my old microwave and but one with a intergrated grill functionality.