a grammar error in the thread title makes it sound as if a doc at bbc is investigating these parties because he/she wants to sleep with underage models
By today's standards you are correct.
But, I'm guessing you weren't alive back then, it was a different time, there was no swipe left or right for consent. I remember being in bars and random girls doing stuff like shoving their hands in my pockets or gyrating into me to indicate their interest, and the blokes did similar stuff.
Watch a few films from the 80's and 90's and you can see what was considered the norm. I was watching Trading Places the other day and some girls on that just randomly get their chests out at a party. Quite jarring by todays norms but back then it wasn't totally surprising.
You believe in guilty until proven innocent clearly,
Don't you mean a pedophile and a rapist ?
Fuck him and good riddance?
Who fucking cares what was in some shitty fucking movie 30 years ago? Hollywood was (and to be real, still is) run by fucking creeps and men who took advantage of their positions. And no, they didn't get away with it because it was "normal," they got away with it because they could. And other men got away with it because society told them it was okay.By today's standards you are correct.
But, I'm guessing you weren't alive back then, it was a different time, there was no swipe left or right for consent. I remember being in bars and random girls doing stuff like shoving their hands in my pockets or gyrating into me to indicate their interest, and the blokes did similar stuff.
Watch a few films from the 80's and 90's and you can see what was considered the norm. I was watching Trading Places the other day and some girls on that just randomly get their chests out at a party. Quite jarring by todays norms but back then it wasn't totally surprising.
You believe in guilty until proven innocent clearly,
You know the difference between a movie and a documentary right?Watch a few films from the 80's and 90's and you can see what was considered the norm. I was watching Trading Places the other day and some girls on that just randomly get their chests out at a party.
Were these parties in Cambodia?By today's standards you are correct.
But, I'm guessing you weren't alive back then, it was a different time, there was no swipe left or right for consent. I remember being in bars and random girls doing stuff like shoving their hands in my pockets or gyrating into me to indicate their interest, and the blokes did similar stuff.
Watch a few films from the 80's and 90's and you can see what was considered the norm. I was watching Trading Places the other day and some girls on that just randomly get their chests out at a party. Quite jarring by todays norms but back then it wasn't totally surprising.
You believe in guilty until proven innocent clearly,
American Pie was a documentary detailing the 90s college experience.You know the difference between a movie and a documentary right?
guess again, i was a teenager in the 90's and started college. and no i did not consider it normal. and referring to movies in the 80's that were written by and made really for men, does not portrait all women and what all women want or do.
You believe that 20 women with very similar stories, his past actions and sayings (recorded), his use of threats and payoffs, makes him completely innocent without question.
But for the record i never said he was guilty, try reading my reply again. No i was stunned that you believe that whatever harm someone has experienced by another, they should never expect and apology or some kind of closure, because "them was the times". riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight
edit: rereading i kinda did say he was guilty, but you are right I dont have proof. just magazine and news accounts of past actions
He did NOT win the popular vote, you are correct.
It's good to remind everyone every once in a while (completely serious):
THIS POTUS DID NOT WIN THE POPULAR VOTE.
PssstIf the blokes done something illegal and gets prosecuted so be it.
They'll never be another Playboy mansion, we've moved on but that shit was considered normal back then. Times change.
Buddy you're missing the fact that these are underage girls. I don't care if a 13 year old begs you to fuck her, if you are an adult and she isn't then you need to back off. But I have a feeling you already know this and are still ok with defending such behavior.By today's standards you are correct.
But, I'm guessing you weren't alive back then, it was a different time, there was no swipe left or right for consent. I remember being in bars and random girls doing stuff like shoving their hands in my pockets or gyrating into me to indicate their interest, and the blokes did similar stuff.
Watch a few films from the 80's and 90's and you can see what was considered the norm. I was watching Trading Places the other day and some girls on that just randomly get their chests out at a party. Quite jarring by todays norms but back then it wasn't totally surprising.
You believe in guilty until proven innocent clearly,
If the blokes done something illegal and gets prosecuted so be it.
They'll never be another Playboy mansion, we've moved on but that shit was considered normal back then. Times change.
It's not cognitive dissonance.I find that highly surprising. I would have thought his horrible, racist views would align quite nicely with those of the pro-Brexit/Little Englander crowd (37.5% of the voting population), while a further 27.8% would be indifferent to him, i.e. the percentage of the voting population that didn't even bother to turn out for something as monumentally important as Brexit.
The Eurosceptic position, underlined by healthy dollops of casual and not so casual racism, has been pushed by Britain's tabloid press for a good thirty years. Given that these were always the best selling papers in the country and highly influential in shaping national opinion, I guess it's hardly surprising that their abhorrent views were adopted by a significant proportion of the population, consciously or otherwise.
I guess the good people of the UK must be suffering from a severe case of cognitive dissonance.
Please pretend i posted every dead gif on the net. Kudos to you.
Hey, your British too. Correct sex pest is sexual harrasment term.Just for the record, out here when we refer to someone as a sex pest we mean that they are generally sexual harassers or men who give women unwanted sexual attention. It's a quick and easy term and even the sexual harassment cases at Westminster when investigations were going on were sort of informally referred to as 'sex pest allegations'. It's just I guess what you'd call a colloquialism in the UK. Similarly we've got terms like love rat for someone who consistently cheats on their partner/commits adultery. They could've called it Sexual Harassment but I suspect the audience for this was aimed to be people in the UK, at least initially.
Hey, your British too. Correct sex pest is sexual harrasment term.
If the blokes done something illegal and gets prosecuted so be it.
They'll never be another Playboy mansion, we've moved on but that shit was considered normal back then. Times change.
Come on people. You realize how lame this sounds right? Welcome to the electoral college.
Anyways he is most certainly a pedophile rapist along with all the other people who ventured onto Epstein's plane. There will be no iustice either.