Dumb question: is that penalty for the customer or the performer? It's a bullshit law either way, but it seems even more fucked up that someone touches her and she gets arrested.http://www.toledoblade.com/State/2007/08/24/Proposed-Ohio-strip-club-law-now-a-touchy-subject.html
Drew Carey is now my milkshake duck.
Trump has been all about stupid. See how he has been talking about Putin recently.I don't think it's a set-up because it's too stupid. This will make it worse, not make it go away. I'd want to keep her out of the headlines until after the midtrerms if I was wanting to help Trump.
Random fans of his who hate her because they like him
Many States have a look but don't touch law in place. They are there to dance etc. not be fondled etc. It can be viewed as sexist but it does offer the Dancers a lot of protection from the very shitty patronsWhy would it be illegal to be touched in the first place? What sort of sexist bullshit law is that?
Still missing #3 though.
I can understand a strip club having a no (inappropriate) touching rule but a law that can lead to arrests of the performer? Dear gawd. It should be the other way around, if anything.Why would it be illegal to be touched in the first place? What sort of sexist bullshit law is that?
Police? Vigilante "justice" gun nuts? Rampant nazis no one does anything to?
ICEPolice? Vigilante "justice" gun nuts? Rampant nazis no one does anything to?
I imagine they are pursuing an extremely loose interpretation of prostitution or something as she apparently allowed the non sexual touch.I can understand a strip club having a no (inappropriate) touching rule but a law that can lead to arrests of the performer? Dear gawd. It should be the other way around, if anything.
They all (+ICE) add up to a very oppressive environment in a lot of places.The police isn't privatized. Gun nuts are just you're average citizens who have existed long before Trump. And a bunch of tiki torch carrying virgins are hardly an army.
The guy who touched her is about to get every facet of his life exposed. I'd feel bad for him if he's not a plant except for the fact that he touched a woman while she was performing seemingly without her consent.
The reports say she "allowed" him to touch her. All they need is one witness saying she gave permission, even just a nod, to the customer and they will probably twist into prostitution (as she was being paid by him as a customer and he got physical sexual gratification). Will be interesting to see of the customer got arrested either for touching or solicitation though; maybe it was just boys being boys...
I wouldn't be surprised if the White House runs its own little intelligence operation to effectuate things like this, probably through DHS.
We also had the curious story of a border patrol agent making a human intelligence approach to NYT reporter Ali Watkins to collect on her sources and methods, implying she was already being investigated.
This administration is obsessed with leaks, has a siege mentality, an irrational assessment of its enemies and consistently pushes ethical norms... surely they have something akin to Nixon's Plumbers in place?