Lmao
You need two ones for this. And as shitty as it sounds, I dont want to have the EU give the UK any extras, there would be not point for other countrys to stay afterwards. Do a Norway or become a Third-Country.She will crumble and back down again, already done that a few times. No deal Brexit would destroy the country and destroy Tories why it won't happen
A flotilla of barges would be sent to the coast of Northern Ireland with energy generators after Brexit to keep the region's lights on in the event of no deal, according to reports on Wednesday.
The scheme, which has been described as "potty" by business leaders in Northern Ireland, is said to be part of contingency planning by Whitehall mandarins in case the UK crashes out of the EU, smashing Ireland's all-island electricity supply in its wake.
According to a leak to the Financial Times, the plan would involve bringing back equipment from military zones such as Afghanistan to build up capacity in the Irish Sea.
Thousands of electricity generators would have to be requisitioned at short notice.
Because the EU mistakes its massive leverage to mean that the UK will take any deal they give it whether or not it is acceptable or not.Why is ANYBODY still considering a Mad Max kind of Brexit? I'm staring to believe that the story about the government's plans to store massive amounts of canned food may not be the usual tabloid pap.
Because the EU mistakes its massive leverage to mean that the UK will take any deal they give it whether or not it is acceptable or not.
Because the EU mistakes its massive leverage to mean that the UK will take any deal they give it whether or not it is acceptable or not.
This is actually reality. There is not really a route to getting No Deal through parliament.
When airlines stop selling plane tickets and people are told to stockpile on food and medicines in the weeks ahead of March 2019, parliament will change their tune and accept whatever deal the EU will offer. Which is gonna be Norway.The problem is that any deal can't get through the house of commons, unless it meets Labour's 6 tests of cakey deliciousness or ERG's fantasy Brexit. They need to capitulate to a deal that makes us much more of a 'vassal state' then the chequers agreement they both oppose.
.
I don't agree that the EU didn't from the start also believe cliff jump hard Brexit was a realistic scenario that may have to be contained. Farage and other lunatics have been a known quantity and already in 2016 the EU was equiped to engage in actual negotiations.Because the EU mistakes its massive leverage to mean that the UK will take any deal they give it whether or not it is acceptable or not.
This is becoming increasingly clear in Whitehall and Westminster and they are finally kicking themself into high gear preparing for this possibility.
I think we all knew he would be unable to shut his mouth during the visit, if he meets Boris then he's really crossing the line and trying to undermine the government.
The only way he is meeting Boris is in Scotland playing Golf, does Boris play Golf?
When airlines stop selling plane tickets and people are told to stockpile on food and medicines in the weeks ahead of March 2019, parliament will change their tune and accept whatever deal the EU will offer. Which is gonna be Norway.
Because the EU mistakes its massive leverage to mean that the UK will take any deal they give it whether or not it is acceptable or not.
This is becoming increasingly clear in Whitehall and Westminster and they are finally kicking themself into high gear preparing for this possibility.
This is similar to what happened with Greece, only unlike Greece, the UK gets to walk away from the table and is less likely to do a 360 and sign the deal anyway.
If a deal that gives the UK what they have now but with no influence is to be tabled that is seen as a politically untenable scenario in the UK in many parliamentarian circles. Sense be damned. They need to sell some kind of victory or at least something that appears like a meaningful victory or they can't accept the deal.
The biggest problem we have faced since the referendum is that Government have approached the Leave vote as some disaster that needs to be mitigated against not as an amazing opportunity that should be embraced. That's how we have ended up where we are now. Sad.
no services is insane. Are they still assuming no freedom of movement and therefore this is pointless twaddle that will get instantly rejected by the EU?
The dream is over, England out of the World Cup.
Every other World Cup, I wouldn't have cared if England won the Cup (if Germany is out) but winning the cup with Brexit going on would send the wrong signal. Does that make sense?
Hard Brexit is never happening, there is just too much fallout and preparations of which there is hardly any would only limit it so much. People would riot.
The UK has a really simple choice. Be a vassle state like Norway that doesn't crater the economy or keep your seat at the top table and cancel Brexit/Referendum status quo choice. Why the UK government would pick anything but the latter would be baffling, the writing is on the wall, the world only cares about the UK because it's in the EU, the US only cares about the UK because it has a seat at the table in the EU and that goes for many other countries. Any other choice is allowing the UK carcass to be picked to the bone by the US as the 51st state and who knows what other vultures swoop in. UK needs to be in the EU and would be wise to have a seat at the top table forging the EU in the future.
Raab suggests UK will stop its £39bn payment to EU if Brussels stalls on trade talks after Brexit
Raab says, if the government found that, having agreed the withdrawal agreement, progress towards a trade deal slowed down, there would be consequences, including to UK's payments to the EU.