Perhaps you would have been better off writing nothing at all thenI've been active in this thread, Nope is simply the level of engagement your claim was worth.
Perhaps you would have been better off writing nothing at all thenI've been active in this thread, Nope is simply the level of engagement your claim was worth.
so instead we must let them spread their message unchallenged?How am I shitting on feminist? And please show me where I defended the guy...
I don't think it's smart to make guys like this into martyrs.
How am I shitting on feminist? And please show me where I defended the guy...
I don't think it's smart to make guys like this into martyrs.
Killing feminists in a fucking video game where you can potentially kill everyone is bad, but watching KKK members burn to death or actively killing people with different opinions in gruesome ways is tolerated or even hilarious. Okay, gotcha. Not hypocritical at all.
Perhaps you would have been better off writing nothing at all then
I see what you did there, and if you:
a) imply that assaulting these "types" of women is okay because they are not productive members of society or some bullshit
b) imply the devs feel the same by allowing this action
Then buddy. You'll have a fun time here.
SolidSnakex As of right now, I am reluctant to look at that spoiler beyond reading "chapter 3". I am sorry. Hopefully, I can come back to your post after I have dealt with chapter 3.
How am I shitting on feminist? And please show me where I defended the guy...
I don't think it's smart to make guys like this into martyrs.
THINKING.JPGKilling feminists in a fucking video game where you can potentially kill everyone is bad, but watching KKK members burn to death or actively killing people with different opinions in gruesome ways is tolerated or even hilarious. Okay, gotcha. Not hypocritical at all.
Why are comparisons between a marginalized group and a hate group happening.
so instead we must let them spread their message unchallenged?
Aka the exact opposite of what Wambo was doing as he typed that post.
Wow you are a fucking moronKilling feminists in a fucking video game where you can potentially kill everyone is bad, but watching KKK members burn to death or actively killing people with different opinions in gruesome ways is tolerated or even hilarious. Okay, gotcha. Not hypocritical at all.
Please show me where I said we just let hateful videos go unhindered or that we shouldn't speak against hate.... I'll wait.I mean, your statement, whether you meant it this way or not, was that we should let such hateful videos go unhindered because to act or speak against them might rile them up to doing more.
Which, you know, is bad and wrong. It is badong.
Jack Thompson argued that games made kids violent. This is some MRA asshole putting his toxic ideology into the game. Completely different.I don't think it's any more hyperbolic than saying this guy was promoting violence with his videos. When he also apparently had videos doing the same things to racists in the game. Don't like the titles he used, but don't think he should have his whole channel banned.
They're still not real people.
Not the same, this game wasn't made to specifically kill feminist characters. It's an open world sandbox wherein you can choose to kill or not kill anybody in it. And, although I don't like these videos where he targets a feminist character (for seemingly because of who she is), even that isn't as bad as making a Nazi simulator. Come on.
That's extrapolating quite a lot, considering he was also doing (or going to do) similar videos towards racists. This is some Jack Thompson BS, GTA/Mortal Kombat gonna poison the kids and make them act out these violent acts kinda shit.
I apologize if you think I was trying to sound smart or above it all or anything like that. I just dislike Youtube's actions, the guy's videos, and the assertions that those videos are promoting real violence against real people.
I've seen some stuff online done with this game that might be worse.
No, report him, get his channel dropped. Don't get him even more publicity by making him a headline.
Killing feminists in a fucking video game where you can potentially kill everyone is bad, but watching KKK members burn to death or actively killing people with different opinions in gruesome ways is tolerated or even hilarious. Okay, gotcha. Not hypocritical at all.
Killing feminists in a fucking video game where you can potentially kill everyone is bad, but watching KKK members burn to death or actively killing people with different opinions in gruesome ways is tolerated or even hilarious. Okay, gotcha. Not hypocritical at all.
You are. My comment didn't deserve a more enhancing response, yet here you are, four posts later, still engaging, but still not saying shit.
He's not being turned into a martyr, he just not being allowed to share his feminist murder fantasies that end up in everyone's algorithms and thus exposing his feminist murder fantasies to an even wider audience,
Gender yes, belief no.Were those things part of a video series dedicated to targeting only a specific or particular group based on their gender and belief?
Killing feminists in a fucking video game where you can potentially kill everyone is bad, but watching KKK members burn to death or actively killing people with different opinions in gruesome ways is tolerated or even hilarious. Okay, gotcha. Not hypocritical at all.
LMAOKilling feminists in a fucking video game where you can potentially kill everyone is bad, but watching KKK members burn to death or actively killing people with different opinions in gruesome ways is tolerated or even hilarious. Okay, gotcha. Not hypocritical at all.
In that case sorry. So the MRA guys made a stupid name. Who woulda thunk it?I'm conjuring the hashtag ironically. It's an actual thing that MRAs use.
Was pulled down actually.
This is so arbitrary. There is nothing wrong with exposing and shaming this kind of garbage. It's just a lazy way of making this a both sides argument by being like yeah he did a bad thing but you're TALKING about it being bad, which is just as badNo, report him, get his channel dropped. Don't get him even more publicity by making him a headline.
I think there's disagreement about whether this actually breaks the TOS because, again, it's from a video game. I think that's the most important fact when looking at what happened, I don't think it should be discounted as some people are doing. I've only got the article to go off of since the video was removed, but it appears in-game he just kills people, and the titles are, while objectionable, just describing what he did. Not something like, "This is what you should do to feminists" which I do think would be promoting or condoning violence against real people, and would break TOS. But the question is, are video game characters protected groups? Personally, I don't think so, which is why I don't think the video strictly breaks the TOS. Maybe the guy made hateful comments in the video, or in the comments on the page, but I don't know that since it was removed.
Thompson often argued that violent games were an outlet where kids could rehearse their existing violent fantasies, which is what you're accusing this guy of doing. And maybe he was, his titles certainly suggest it, but there is no study that shows real life violence linked to video game violence, so the point would be moot regardless of why he made the video.Jack Thompson argued that games made kids violent. This is some MRA asshole putting his toxic ideology into the game. Completely different.
To be fair though, I don't think game characters should get the right to vote. If that's what you are getting at.This may come as a huge shock to you because you keep repeating it BUT no one gives a shit if you think the npc was annoying. It has no relevance to this topic aside from lowkey trying to justify the videos and your own ridiculous response to the npc in question. So you can stop talking about how annoying a character being abrasive about her right to vote is kthx.
I think there's disagreement about whether this actually breaks the TOS because, again, it's from a video game. I think that's the most important fact when looking at what happened, I don't think it should be discounted as some people are doing. I've only got the article to go off of since the video was removed, but it appears in-game he just kills people, and the titles are, while objectionable, just describing what he did. Not something like, "This is what you should do to feminists" which I do think would be promoting or condoning violence against real people, and would break TOS. But the question is, are video game characters protected groups? Personally, I don't think so, which is why I don't think the video strictly breaks the TOS. Maybe the guy made hateful comments in the video, or in the comments on the page, but I don't know that since it was removed.
It's not one video it's at least 5 videos.I think there's disagreement about whether this actually breaks the TOS because, again, it's from a video game. I think that's the most important fact when looking at what happened, I don't think it should be discounted as some people are doing. I've only got the article to go off of since the video was removed, but it appears in-game he just kills people, and the titles are, while objectionable, just describing what he did. Not something like, "This is what you should do to feminists" which I do think would be promoting or condoning violence against real people, and would break TOS. But the question is, are video game characters protected groups? Personally, I don't think so, which is why I don't think the video strictly breaks the TOS. Maybe the guy made hateful comments in the video, or in the comments on the page, but I don't know that since it was removed.
Killing feminists in a fucking video game where you can potentially kill everyone is bad, but watching KKK members burn to death or actively killing people with different opinions in gruesome ways is tolerated or even hilarious.
I'm not entertaining your "it's just pixels" bs sorrynotsorry.I think there's disagreement about whether this actually breaks the TOS because, again, it's from a video game.
You're not clever.To be fair though, I don't think game characters should get the right to vote. If that's what you are getting at.
Sorry to derail just for a second, but this made me chuckle. I'm not that far in the game (after 30 hours only still chapter 2), butI smile everytime he dies during story mission.
Game was like: MISSION FAILED
I was like: No, let's just roll with it okay
Did you just not walk away and just stay in her general vicinity or.....I agree that he went excessive with the videos. But that specific NPC is quite obnoxious and I almost killed her because of how annoying she is. There are a lot of other feminists in the game that are fine and tells a nice story.