Oh yeah I had that exchange there between DC and Faddy. Not sure if that was manufactured between scum buddies or scum Faddy trying to sway an ET vote without moving himself.
technically he has shown up.
He's just not done much. Tries to downplay Grizzly's read (which included Sophia as scum), some snark directed at me and Gorlak (?) and said we shouldn't be lynching for info and that there is a case to be built but hasn't really tried to build a case despite saying that.
1. Grizzly got Faddy, and I'm town. So Grizzly was right, but not super-right.
2. These reads take time. It's not my job to "inspire confidence" in you. And Gorlak is just being Gorlak so maybe I am ignoring him on purpose.
Did you mention this to AB and melon?Downplaying the reads of a dead confirmed town isn't a good look to me.
I don't give a shit about Fanto's next to no information D1 reads.
malus thoughts on melon other than what you posted above. have you paid any attention to her?Not sure. She's always kind of low post count due to time zones and stuff. To be honest I haven't really paid attention to her and am now on mobile so rereading isn't a thing. The only thing that I thought was suspect is her vote on CS d1 which didn't really have any reasoning behind it.
If you're referring to Grizzly, wasn't he neutral, not town?We don't know you're town til you're lynched. Downplaying the reads of a dead confirmed town isn't a good look to me.
neutral
You still didnt answer the question. paraphrased or not, they are fanto's reads.Difference is, we know Grizzly's reads for a fact (ie they have been posted - not paraphrased - in the thread) and of course one of his scum reads was right. The other scum read he had was Sophia, a top scum read.
It shouldn't be downplayed, especially after one of the scum reads was scum.
CoolestSpot has asked to be replaced. I am seeking a replacement.
Order of operations:
1. Appease Stuart
2. Appease Gorlak
3. Scum hunt
Grizzly's are here straight from the Bear's mouth. We have to take your word for Fantomas's reads, and even without my current tunnel home, without a flip or green check there's no reason to take your word for anything.You still didnt answer the question. paraphrased or not, they are fanto's reads.
yea, that wasnt aimed at you. You dont believe me anway.Grizzly's are here straight from the Bear's mouth. We have to take your word for Fantomas's reads, and even without my current tunnel home, without a flip or green check there's no reason to take your word for anything.
Even if I got green checked. You already made up your mind.Grizzly's are here straight from the Bear's mouth. We have to take your word for Fantomas's reads, and even without my current tunnel home, without a flip or green check there's no reason to take your word for anything.
turmoil7 you sticking with Nin over LP? Has anything changed so far from what has been said today since your vote?
*note he never voted for alexemboth great, even alexem.
who votes for me because i am inactive for one single day.
that just takes the cake.
Fuck it. I'm role claiming because everyone is already super on edge about me and this is role is probably going to get me killed at some point if I don't say something.
I'm a town sleepwalker. I randomally visit another player at night. I have no idea who it actually is. I feel like this will be easily verifiable unless I visited scum/Fanto last night unless a switcher is fucking around.
Was 2 votes on chug. He claimed early to "preemptively" get ahead of a possible tracker/watcher. Stu just rolled over and accepted the claim w/o questioning it.
I think chugs could be a good info lynch.
I guess this also bears bringing up. We know now that Panda is town and Faddy was scum. :-\
I guess this also bears bringing up. We know now that Panda is town and Faddy was scum. :-\
Which makes wanting to protect Faddy even weirder, to me at least.People weren't scum reading Faddy too much at the time tbh. I fought hard to get that lynch when most were willing to give him a pass so /shrug
Not going to lie Stu. If it comes down to LP or Chuggernaut, I'd
Vote: TheChuggernaut
Which makes wanting to protect Faddy even weirder, to me at least.
Uhm, is there a problem? I just stated what happened when he claimed.Guess we're going to be on opposite sides of the fence again.
Not a problem, because if and when I'm proven right, you can again, be all
Uhm, is there a problem? I just stated what happened when he claimed.
People weren't scum reading Faddy too much at the time tbh. I fought hard to get that lynch when most were willing to give him a pass so /shrug
If you think someone is town, protecting them seems quite normal to me.
I also just find it hard to believe that scum would gambit right after losing someone D1 the very next day.
My vote will almost certainly move to an actual contender (though it looks like L_P will be the runaway vote). TheChuggernaut has no other votes and hasn't had a chance to say anything so I'm good with voting there for now. I'm about to leave the office though, so I'll have only spotty connection for the next hour and some, and I will probably be driving at EoD and will not look at my phone if that is the case.With regards to Absolutbro's vote on Chuggernaut, I don't think that's unwarranted given his concerns. I wouldn't go all in on that interpretation myself as it is, but I can see where he's coming from. Possibly one to bear in mind down the line.
Sorry, didn't realise you were after my opinion - I just wanted to check I was thinking of the right one and thought it might be useful to pair up your suggestion with the post you had in mind. Since you ask, I think it's a valid point to make but I wouldn't call it conclusive by itself. It could, in all fairness, have been a genuine error of calculation - until the game's resolved, we don't know for certain how many scum we were dealing with at the time.Alexem you found the turmoil quoted and asked if I meant that earlier, but you never commented on it. No opinion?