https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...nst-meddling-presidential-election/984117001/
EDIT: Original Poster baby
EDIT: Original Poster baby
Last edited:
Another irony is that Putin has benefited from US meddling in Russia's democratic process in the past since the US propped up the Yeltsin campaign in 96 and he went on to effectively groom Putin as his successor.
Putin was appointed director of the FSB directly by Yeltsin in 1998, and then appointed Prime Minister again by Yeltsin a year later. The actual changeover may not have been entirely on Yeltsin's terms but he was clearly groomed for the position of president.Not really. Security apparatus pushed Putin to the top and forced Yeltsin to resign.
This.The US won't intervene simply because there's no real election to intervene in to begin with.
I don't think it's really possible for the US to meddle in the upcoming election in Russia in the same way they did in the US. People here don't really use social media as much or the same way they do in the US. It isn't really seen as an important extension of one's life where video, news and media is consumed daily from it. Political discourse isn't really a thing here either so it's hard to influence a conversation if it isn't happening. FB and twitter aren't popular in Russia either.
Putin was appointed director of the FSB directly by Yeltsin in 1998, and then appointed Prime Minister again by Yeltsin a year later. The actual changeover may not have been entirely on Yeltsin's terms but he was clearly groomed for the position of president.
Yep.Meanwhile, Putin is meddling in his own election by banning his #1 opponent from being a candidate.
If you mean Navalny then it's not a loss in any way or form.Didn't the other guy get "disqualified" from the election anyway?