Again, I didn't recommend it because I expected it to be everyone's cup of tea. For Yuri Kuma, are you referring to Yuri Kuma Arashi?Uthena was an enjoyable clusterfuck, not bad,but neither everyone's cup of tea, check Yuri Kuma then
Again, I didn't recommend it because I expected it to be everyone's cup of tea. For Yuri Kuma, are you referring to Yuri Kuma Arashi?Uthena was an enjoyable clusterfuck, not bad,but neither everyone's cup of tea, check Yuri Kuma then
I am astounded at people who think male gaze isn't a thing cause they think the camera is an autonomous entity.
Maybe it's 'cause you bragged about rolling your eyes at a woman's opinion.I do not understand how you can not figure this out after all this time.
Wasn't it Valkyr1983 who said that he rolled his eyes?Maybe it's 'cause you bragged about rolling your eyes at a woman's opinion.
Think about what you're doing for half a second.
Also, show me this clip of everyone rolling their eyes.
Maybe it's 'cause you bragged about rolling your eyes at a woman's opinion.
Think about what you're doing for half a second.
Also, show me this clip of everyone rolling their eyes.
I'd bet that people are really reading too much into the eye roll thing.
Side note: any games site staff locking themselves in a room to argue GOTY over hours is immensely dumb.
Yeah sorry I was a bit frustrated about something else and took it out on you. And also accidentally FrankJaeger. Sorry everyone again.I wasn't bragging , just stating I shared the same feeling
I had way bigger issues with the goty deliberations this year and I'm not going to get hung up on her Nier opinion. I can see the issues in the game I guess I just felt strongly the game is good enough to overcome something like that and earn it's place. It appears the group as a collective agreed. I wasn't bothered by her opinion on 2b, just would have probably been more relevant in the character discussion they did, and no mention of it. Just seemed to come from nowhere
I apologize if I came across as belittling, I genuinely do enjoy Abby's video content and addition to GBEast
I was legitimately bothered by the best world category which was a disaster and puzzled by Dream Daddy cracking top 10 over several games the team seemed more into, but that discussion is not for this topic
Yeah that's why I wanna see the clip. I don't listen to the main cast, but in the Beastcast, at least, Vinny and Alex generally have Abby's back on stuff like this. And even bring it up on their own. (Especially Vinny.) (Dan sucks.)I'd bet that people are really reading too much into the eye roll thing.
Side note: any games site staff locking themselves in a room to argue GOTY over hours is immensely dumb.
My basic argument is that there should be more diverse designs. Both for women and men. It goes for ethnicity, clothing, shapes and so on.Well, let's start over then.
I myself have not understood any of your points, except when you bring up strawmen that nobody here argues for.
What is your basic argument that adds to this discussion? Why are you here, in this particular topic? What are you even trying to say? If 100% of the people have "misunderstood" you, the problem must lie with you and not your audience. Your audience is reacting according to their own ideas.
Try again from the top.
Why? Giant bombs deliberations are legit some of my favorite content to look forward to each year
So if you have no desire to talk, whether it is because of what has been posted here or because you disagree at some fundamental level, what is the point of posting here in the first place? You clearly don't want to talk (at this point anyway). Also, worth noting that a lot of what you are saying above is extremely dismissive and defensive. Calling everyone in the thread (or the forum) toxic, seeing the world in black and white, and hostile is a huge misrepresentation of what's occurring here, as well as the people in the thread. By making these generalizations you're doing exactly what you say you have disdain for. Do you not see the irony in that?My basic argument is that there should be more diverse designs. Both for women and men. It goes for ethnicity, clothing, shapes and so on.
I am here, because, I am interested in this topic and want to see what people think about this (though, not any longer). My stance for diversity haven't changed, but I don't see what to discuss with clearly biased and hostile crowd, which had a very toxic reaction to simple misunderstanding and not only at mine own.
I would have gladly listen to people who respect others, but it seems here (as in on this forum, not only in this thread) people think that if they are angry about something, they can treat everyone, who even potentially can disagree with them, like shit. Good way to turn away all your potential allies.
I won't be turned away, but neither I have any desire to talk with you. Why bother discussing something with nuances, when people want to see the whole world only in black and white, do hot takes and feel good?
If my "audience" reacts according to their own ideas it might tell not as much about my failure to convey my points, which certainly had occurred in this thread, but not to the disastrous degree, but about the fact that people are biased and understands any opinion that differs from their own, whether said difference purely formulaic or conveys more nuances than people here get used to, with automatic hostility and dismissal as "defensive and defensive" opinion for something that they don't like, like it had occurred above, when I was trying to convey my ideas about characters being author's tools and someone misconstrued the whole thing as "dismissive to problems", which was enormously annoying and wrong, also, if you have read to this part you might be interested to know that I like cute kittens and when I was trying to sew mine own doll, I have ended up with some monstrocity made out of old sleepers and pin cushion.
I mean...they have literally 5 of those.In general I find game site top 10 GOTY lists to be a messy discussion resulting in an article that just result in every last comment complaining that their game didn't score as high as they wanted.
Like instead they could literally have a normal podcast about their standout games of the year.
Disregarding the rest of your post, which is off topic at best, what sorts of diversity would you personally like to see?My basic argument is that there should be more diverse designs. Both for women and men. It goes for ethnicity, clothing, shapes and so on.
Don't act all innocent and stop acting like you're some kind of victim of people twisting your words. Like the hostility had nothing to do with your choice shit posts? Remember these?My basic argument is that there should be more diverse designs. Both for women and men. It goes for ethnicity, clothing, shapes and so on.
I am here, because, I am interested in this topic and want to see what people think about this (though, not any longer). My stance for diversity haven't changed, but I don't see what to discuss with clearly biased and hostile crowd, which had a very toxic reaction to simple misunderstanding and not only at mine own.
I would have gladly listen to people who respect others, but it seems here (as in on this forum, not only in this thread) people think that if they are angry about something, they can treat everyone, who even potentially can disagree with them, like shit. Good way to turn away all your potential allies.
I won't be turned away, but neither I have any desire to talk with you. Why bother discussing something with nuances, when people want to see the whole world only in black and white, do hot takes and feel good?
If my "audience" reacts according to their own ideas it might tell not as much about my failure to convey my points, which certainly had occurred in this thread, but not to the disastrous degree, but about the fact that people are biased and understands any opinion that differs from their own, whether said difference purely formulaic or conveys more nuances than people here get used to, with automatic hostility and dismissal as "defensive and defensive" opinion for something that they don't like, like it had occurred above, when I was trying to convey my ideas about characters being author's tools and someone misconstrued the whole thing as "dismissive to problems", which was enormously annoying and wrong, also, if you have read to this part you might be interested to know that I like cute kittens and when I was trying to sew mine own doll, I have ended up with some monstrocity made out of old sleepers and pin cushion.
I should have worded my point differently - I think this opinion, that RE is somehow bad, and the rest of the Internet is worse - somewhat hilarious.
Though for some people glass is always half-empty.
Sorry, I am not specialist on fictional women.
Goodspeed to you in this uneasy study.
Should I send you a hand cream?
And not have the GOTY staff sweatbox meeting at all I mean, resulting in less threads here with a required disclaimer saying "please do not call people fake journalists"
I am astounded at people who think male gaze isn't a thing cause they think the camera is an autonomous entity.
Like, do they realize the camera is controlled by a human being? That's the entire point of cinematography.
It's right up there with "but this female character enjoys wearing a bikini and high heels to battle!" imo
It's right up there with "but this female character enjoys wearing a bikini and high heels to battle!" imo
I've watched the first three episodes of The Rose of Versailles on Crunchyroll which has a female lead. It is interesting so far, and the animation is surprisingly good for 1979. It might be something to look into if you want an anime without moeblobs and panty shots, but again, I haven't watched the entire thing. I like how Lady Oscar wears mens' clothes and most of the characters who know she's a woman are fine with her acting like a man (based on the standards of 18th century France anyway).
I feel like older shows allowed women to shine more than today in certain respects. 1983's Golion killed off a dude just to give the main girl his giant robot, and she rocked it.
In the past year I've seen folk cling so hard to the defense of problematic media just so they can like something conflict free. I dared to criticize Mario games for it's disgusting use of kidnapping and forced marriage and straight up lost friends.
Even better when they will flip around and scream "realism" when women are shown in other stuff getting raped or other demeaning things that also are for titillation. Because as we all know, in a land of flying lizard monsters and zombies, I need women to be portrayed by my assumptions of the past (actual history not needed).
I remember when I was 14... casting Apocalypse... ahh the old days.Reminds me of the "pedo/incest shit in Fire Emblem is okay because those things happened in medieval times!!" crowd. Ah yes, I remember learning about the dragon wars of 1564 in school...
That's okay. If you are no longer interested in the conversation, you don't have to participate any further. That's the beauty of internet forums, you can choose which threads you click and you can choose to hit reply or not.I am here, because, I am interested in this topic and want to see what people think about this (though, not any longer).
I would refrain from calling everyone toxic and making generalizations, when your own posts have been repeatedly hostile, rude, and dismissive.My stance for diversity haven't changed, but I don't see what to discuss with clearly biased and hostile crowd, which had a very toxic reaction to simple misunderstanding and not only at mine own.
I would have gladly listen to people who respect others, but it seems here (as in on this forum, not only in this thread) people think that if they are angry about something, they can treat everyone, who even potentially can disagree with them, like shit. Good way to turn away all your potential allies.
.......If my "audience" reacts according to their own ideas it might tell not as much about my failure to convey my points, which certainly had occurred in this thread, but not to the disastrous degree, but about the fact that people are biased and understands any opinion that differs from their own, whether said difference purely formulaic or conveys more nuances than people here get used to, with automatic hostility and dismissal as "defensive and defensive" opinion for something that they don't like, like it had occurred above, when I was trying to convey my ideas about characters being author's tools and someone misconstrued the whole thing as "dismissive to problems", which was enormously annoying and wrong, also, if you have read to this part you might be interested to know that I like cute kittens and when I was trying to sew mine own doll, I have ended up with some monstrocity made out of old sleepers and pin cushion.
No.You don't think that "standards of women" sounds a bit...awkward, no?
This is so frustratingly true I wish we could punch all the brains in anime with the message.
I also want more slice-of-life. I miss my slice of life (well, slice of life that doesn't happen in a high school). *sigh*
Additionally, where the hell did anime like xxxHolic go?
My favorite is still "there's an in-game reason she looks like that!"It's right up there with "but this female character enjoys wearing a bikini and high heels to battle!" imo
This is so frustratingly true I wish we could punch all the brains in anime with the message.
I also want more slice-of-life. I miss my slice of life (well, slice of life that doesn't happen in a high school). *sigh*
Additionally, where the hell did anime like xxxHolic go?
'She's part plant and breathes through her skin, you'll be ashamed when you realise this is why she chooses torn fishnets and little else on the battlefield' is going to take some beating, isn't it.My favorite is still "there's an in-game reason she looks like that!"
I consider Kino's Journey more in the vein of adventure, like Mushishi (though Mushishi is closer to xxxHolic, which is probably part of the reason I love it so much).We got a new Kino's Journey last season. That was pretty good.
Pretty sure I've seen these. What's the Sketchbook Full Colors romaji name? Definitely seen Yokohama Kaidashi Kikou.You'll get more out of japanese SoL if you read manga instead.
Otherwise, i always suggest Sketchbook full colors, a predecessor to the popularity of KyoAni SoL, focused more on an art club with a big cast than school itself, which personally makes all the difference. Show is much more about humans, art, and motions towards accepting others than useless comedy. Another one that's old and perhaps super hard to find is the original Yokohama Kaidashi Kikou OVA, which is also super good.
Yep, definitely seen that one! Again, it's another high school anime.
Let me tell you about Dragoons and how they use high heels to work their lances as pogo sticks.'She's part plant and breathes through her skin, you'll be ashamed when you realise this is why she chooses torn fishnets and little else on the battlefield' is going to take some beating, isn't it.
Next season is gonna be fire for comedy SoL with Chio-chan no Tsuugakuro, Wotaku ni Koi wa Muzukashii and HinamatsuriI consider Kino's Journey more in the vein of adventure, like Mushishi (though Mushishi is closer to xxxHolic, which is probably part of the reason I love it so much).
Pretty sure I've seen these. What's the Sketchbook Full Colors romaji name? Definitely seen Yokohama Kaidashi Kikou.
Also, I read manga on occasion, but I tend to just read regular books lately (though not books most people would be interested in I think ^^;).
Yep, definitely seen that one! Again, it's another high school anime.
It would REALLY HURT if you got hit with one! And if you saw a woman coming at you in high heels you'd lower your defense because SURELY SHE WOULDN'T FIGHT ME IN THOSE!!!!!Let me tell you about Dragoons and how they use high heels work their lances as pogo sticks.
Er, I concede the point. :DLet me tell you about Dragoons and how they use high heels work their lances as pogo sticks.
Hinamatsuri could be good, the other two I'm kinda "eh" at. Admittedly, not super familiar with any of them.Next season is gonna be fire for comedy SoL with Chio-chan no Tsuugakuro, Wotaku ni Koi wa Muzukashii and Hinamatsuri
Honestly those are three of my favorite mangas all get anime adaptations at once. Super exciting Spring in a season where usually all I get is a bunch of shitty fanservice animes.
Yeah, looking forward to Hakumei to Mikochi. Looks charming as hell.If the Hakumei to Mikochi adaptation is as good as its source material, it's definitely going to be one of the best shows of the year, and that's an SoL too.
I didn't nearly enjoy this year's podcast as much as usual. I found most of Abby's opinions boiling down to "it's very good" and championing cuphead for like every topic
Jason was absent a lot, Jeff and Vinny seemed to have given up a bit towards end
But yeah that nier discussion. If you watch the video version you can see most of the cast sigh and roll their eyes when she brings that up and I was right there with them.
I can see the criticism, but the idea it would impact the game for the whole collective group enough to drop placement on the list? No way
When I met Cindy I thought of Kaylee from the TV series Firefly. The actress, Jewel, is a beautiful woman, but she isn't shown with her breasts spilling out of her jacket or wearing a bikini, or anything like that. She just wears regular clothes. The emphasis isn't that she's a beautiful, sexy, attractive woman. Or incessant boob camera close ups. Instead the focus is how she is a gifted mechanic. She's kind, trusting, compassionate. She is a person, not just a sexy woman. Cindy however, was a pair of lovingly rendered breasts, given a name and a backstory - these particular breasts like bouncing around near cars! Wow! End of character design. It feels demoralising in a way - the female character exists just to look pretty and make you want to have sex with her, while the male characters are busy saving the world. While both Cindy and Kaylee fulfil the similar role of 'female mechanic'; one comes across as just a shallow excuse to bounce some boobs around on screen, the other feels like an actual character with depth and purpose. That to me is the issue - not the look itself but that it is often all they are - a glorified piece of scenery to look sexy.
Don't get me wrong, I have zero issue with female characters being portrayed as sexy. I'm female, I like to dress up and feel attractive myself, but that's not my sole purpose. And I'm not walking round the store in nipples tassels and hot pants buying bread and milk! When it's so gratuitous it kind of sours the whole experience. Sure, have the characters look beautiful, even sexy, but at least also remember to give them a personality and a purpose other than to smile and giggle and bounce their boobs.
This thread has been incredibly informative. Seeing like minded opinions have strengthened my desire for, and commitment to a better future.
My awareness on the problematic elements of so many games has grown significantly thanks to all the willingness to share it here. (We all can't know everything right?)
Thanks ever so much to the original poster and to all the positive voices here.
In the past year I've seen folk cling so hard to the defense of problematic media just so they can like something conflict free. I dared to criticize Mario games for it's disgusting use of kidnapping and forced marriage and straight up lost friends.
Not much to add but this thread has been a real eye-opener for me, I consider myself a super progressive person especially when it comes to women's issues but I think I (and a lot of other people like me) have had a big blind spot when it comes to being critical of these issues in gaming and going by the amount of responses in this thread I'm glad it's getting some attention. It's depressing to consider how many women have been driven away from gaming, be it from playing them or making them and I hope it turns a corner so everyone can feel comfortable.
I actually liked mario odyssey because in the endingWhy the fuck is just saying "yeah I like this thing, I realize that it has some problematic aspects tho" so damn difficult? I played SMO, I loved my time with it, it's a strong contender for GOTY of 2017 for me, and yet I realize the fucking forced marriage bullshit is extremely wrong and shouldn't have been in the game (not that forced marriages can't be a topic in video games, but a cartoony series like Mario isn't well equipped to deal with such a heavy topic). Like, it's not hard.
I wonder how oblivious you'd have to be to buy that. If I make a criticism like "I don't like the color of that carpet", telling me that the person who chose it did so for a reason doesn't do a damned thing to address my criticism.'She's part plant and breathes through her skin, you'll be ashamed when you realise this is why she chooses torn fishnets and little else on the battlefield' is going to take some beating, isn't it.
If there's one peeve I have about the effect of JRPGs and the like on the game industry is the way they stole the word "dragoon". It's a real word to begin with, and it's not supposed to have anything to do with dragons.Let me tell you about Dragoons and how they use high heels to work their lances as pogo sticks.
This feels like an example of Japanese designers not really understanding the issue.I actually liked mario odyssey because in the endingafter escaping from the moon's core, both mario and bowser unashamedly try to get peach's affection, shoving flowers into her face. She eventually gets annoyed and says no to both of them and just goes home. I thought it was nice to see her actually react to being treated as an object of attraction and a trophy for them to fight over, it was kind of a nice surprise.
I actually liked mario odyssey because in the endingafter escaping from the moon's core, both mario and bowser unashamedly try to get peach's affection, shoving flowers into her face. She eventually gets annoyed and says no to both of them and just goes home. I thought it was nice to see her actually react to being treated as an object of attraction and a trophy for them to fight over, it was kind of a nice surprise.
If there's one peeve I have about the effect of JRPGs and the like on the game industry is the way they stole the word "dragoon". It's a real word to begin with, and it's not supposed to have anything to do with dragons.
A member of any of several cavalry regiments in the British army.
Origin:
- 1.1historical A mounted infantryman armed with a carbine.
Early 17th century (denoting a kind of carbine or musket, thought of as breathing fire): from French dragon 'dragon'.
If there's one peeve I have about the effect of JRPGs and the like on the game industry is the way they stole the word "dragoon". It's a real word to begin with, and it's not supposed to have anything to do with dragons.
Next season is gonna be fire for comedy SoL with Chio-chan no Tsuugakuro, Wotaku ni Koi wa Muzukashii and Hinamatsuri
Honestly those are three of my favorite mangas all get anime adaptations at once. Super exciting Spring in a season where usually all I get is a bunch of shitty fanservice animes.
Oh and Amichu is back, which is high school, but some weird high school where all the girls wear big rose dresses as uniforms.
It would REALLY HURT if you got hit with one! And if you saw a woman coming at you in high heels you'd lower your defense because SURELY SHE WOULDN'T FIGHT ME IN THOSE!!!!!
I agree that that was nice, but it still doesn't negate the whole "lol Bowser kidnapped a woman and forced her to marry him, how funny!" setting, imo. It's an example of taking one step forward and, like, 10 steps back.
also Peach/Pauline is the OTP and should've been made canon