I wonder how they'll get Dark Souls 3 running on the Switch. It didn't even have a rock solid frame rate on the PS4. THat said, hope it's true. I'd love to have the whole trilogy on a portable.
My guess is they'll use a "hybrid" engine developed by the porting company. Remember that the DS Remaster is being handled by a different company.I wonder how they'll get Dark Souls 3 running on the Switch. It didn't even have a rock solid frame rate on the PS4. THat said, hope it's true. I'd love to have the whole trilogy on a portable.
Why would they skip 2 though? DS2 is a part of the serie as much as DS1 and DS3. Would be strange if they jumped directly from DS1 to DS3, in my opinion. And personally, i think DS2 is a great game. Its my most played Dark Souls game as well, played it for nearly 400 hours (that includes the DLC). I played up to New Game 7+ or something.Yeah triology bundle doesnt make sense when they can charge separately.. why bother with 2 though?
Replacement Switch screens will suddenly be in high demand...Shortly after release, there will be many reports of increased rage on the streets.
Did you just compare Dark Souls to COD?ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME.
Not mad at FromSoftware but Namco Bandai is gonna milk this series dry. It's the same issue with DOTA and Valve's treatment toward it while neglecting their actual stuff.
I'm tired of waiting for a true Pac-Man World successor or a new Klonoa game. Use your actual shit and stop living off liscensed games and
slapping your name on games you have no hand in making. Dark Souls is this generations COD when it comes to coversaturization and fanbase alone.
So sick of Namco being too lazy to make their own shit anymore yet are willing to overrely on DS.
It won't, just like it doesn't run Doom acceptably, but you'll all still buy it :PI don't believe for a second that the Switch can run DS3 acceptably.
Difference is that Doom ran at 60fps on console with dynamic resolution while DS3 dropped had drops below 30 on XB1.It won't, just like it doesn't run Doom acceptably, but you'll all still buy it :P
When something is milked and overrelied on, Yes. Although admittedly a more fair comparison would be like how Valve slaps their name on DOTA to make their buck and is giving that franchise a special treatment while neglecting all their actual intellectual properties (aside from TF2 finally being updated again as of recently. Don't count on any proper new games for any of their IPs though)
Yea I'm sure DS3 will run even worse than Doom does.Difference is that Doom ran at 60fps on console with dynamic resolution while DS3 dropped had drops below 30 on XB1.
stay mad while I'm here praising the motherfucking SUNARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME.
Not mad at FromSoftware but Namco Bandai is gonna milk this series dry. It's the same issue with DOTA and Valve's treatment toward it while neglecting their actual stuff.
I'm tired of waiting for a true Pac-Man World successor or a new Klonoa game. Use your actual shit and stop living off liscensed games and
slapping your name on games you have no hand in making. Dark Souls is this generations COD when it comes to coversaturization and fanbase alone.
So sick of Namco being too lazy to make their own shit anymore yet are willing to overrely on DS.
Yeah triology bundle doesnt make sense when they can charge separately.. why bother with 2 though?
Meh. I love the Dark Souls games having only played them on PC I can't imagine experiencing them at 30 FPS.
You know what games deserve actual remasters?
I agree with you. I think all games should be made available to play on modern system if possible but, unfortunately, only some are. You shouldn't be mad over Dark Souls getting a remaster, only upset that Bamco is ignoring other good franchises.You know what games deserve actual remasters?
Pac-Man World 2
Klonoa 2
Games that are over 10 years old at this point.
well, they're the publisher for Dark Souls, so...I don't know why you would want them in development with FROM?I'm mad because Namco has overrelied on Dark Souls since 2011 by slapping their name on it and making money off it when they have jack shit to do with development. All they ever develop anymore is Tales and generic liscensed anime games.
every game that actually had fans and doesn't exist on a modern platform?
Klonoa 2 still hasn't seen a proper rerelease and Pac-Man World, despite it's fair popularity and being the thing that made people WANT Pac-Man in Smash 4 to begin with has been almost completely ignored by Namco Bandai.every game that actually had fans and doesn't exist on a modern platform?
With most console companies taking the posture of future-proofing their system architectures, everything should be moved onto those architectures so they're available to new customers for years to come.
As someone who is "people" and who wanted Pac-Man in Smash 4 but who never had and continues not to have any interest in Pac-Man World, you're putting an awful lot of words into my mouth.Klonoa 2 still hasn't seen a proper rerelease and Pac-Man World, despite it's fair popularity and being the thing that made people WANT Pac-Man in Smash 4 to begin with has been almost completely ignored by Namco Bandai.
Most people I have seen wanted the character due to his movesets in said trilogy.As someone who is "people" and who wanted Pac-Man in Smash 4 but who never had and continues not to have any interest in Pac-Man World, you're putting an awful lot of words into my mouth.
It's not surprising that companies would start by porting their most popular titles first, then niche titles later when the audience has swelled.
Most people I have seen wanted the character due to his movesets in said trilogy.
A lot of other people simply didn't want him because they never knew about said games and simply knew him as a flat eyeless shape.
Exactly, But moves and abilities were moreso the common factor. People who didn't play the World Trilogy thought he would be boring and simply just chomp enemies.Pac-Man World wasn't the first time we saw a Pac-Man design that wasn't the classic sprite.
https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net..._Boxart.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20151225080042
I don't really see how people not being very imaginative about Smash movesets now means that the character was only added because of his appearance in this one particular game and that therefore it deserves to be remastered.Exactly, But moves and abilities were moreso the common factor. People who didn't play the World Trilogy thought he would be boring and simply just chomp enemies.
49.99 with all DLC included is my guess.
But man, if true, this gen really is remaster-gen. WTF?
I wonder how they'll get Dark Souls 3 running on the Switch. It didn't even have a rock solid frame rate on the PS4. THat said, hope it's true. I'd love to have the whole trilogy on a portable.
I can.
Well, Bloodborne (and DS3) runs on an upgraded version of the DS2 engine, so... yes?Could they theoretically go back and remaster DS1 and DS2 using the Bloodborne engine?
Yeah that is definitely a concern for me and I'm sure many sacrifices will have to be made to get it to run acceptably on the Switch. The game may end up looking like Xenoblade Chronicles on the 3DS but we shall see...
if the lastest sales reports showed anything is that no, they didn't.It won't, just like it doesn't run Doom acceptably, but you'll all still buy it :P
Just don't buy them until they are a bundle.Nice. Milking the franchise. Sell three games for $60 each or include all three games in one package for $60. Sucks for consumers.
Well it's $40 and not $60 so I'll bite. That $20 makes a world of difference! Hope the other ports will be in that price range too