• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Slackbladder

Member
Nov 24, 2017
1,146
Kent
Blimey to think Sky viewers last year were only 652,000 whilst Channel 4 was 1.9 million. Really makes F1 an elite sport (well, by 2019 in could get a lot worse). the £150 NowTV deal is tempting but I don't know. For someone who's watched F1 since the late 70's paying such a premium really grates. Kinda' just...wrong.
 

KdotIX

A King's Landing
Member
Oct 25, 2017
332
I think I will be going for the nowtv deal at some point this week because it will also enable me to see some premier league football matches up until Dec.
 

GestaltGaz

Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,000
Just watched the 2010 season review and confirms many things in my eyes. Vettel was very lucky to win that year due to many reasons but mainly:
  • Lewis retirements. When he didn't crash or had car trouble he did very well. Those lost points would have put him in the lead or close to the championship.
  • Mark was hard done by which I'll get into later, but he fucked up too. His slow starts often compromised chances to win at the front, the crash in Korea was his fault, and the poor qualifying in Abu Dhabi put his chance away.
  • Alonso should have won after the good performance and the end of the season. The team lost his chance by pitting early in Abu Dhabi. He stays out to pit later he wins the championship simple as that. Ferrari fucked it up.
Vettel showed he consistently struggled under pressure, which many continue to suggest today and was evidenced late last season. He crashed into Webber in Turkey and Marko publicly backed him over Webber. From there it was obvious who the higher ups preferred to win. His 2x crashes in Belgium was amateur hour. His slow restart after safety car behind Webber was his fault, and he whined about being punished for it the rest of the race. He stalled coming out of the Singapore pit. Incidents under pressure and labelled 'crash kid' by Whitmarsh.

He continues to struggle under pressure and close races show where he stands compared to Alonso and Hamilton. But out in front he does lead well. This is where he shines. But 2010 was gifted to him.
 

zeknurn

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,270
I don't think F1 TV will be launched in time for this weekend. They did say early in the season to be fair.
 

Dan

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,961
Blimey to think Sky viewers last year were only 652,000 whilst Channel 4 was 1.9 million. Really makes F1 an elite sport (well, by 2019 in could get a lot worse). the £150 NowTV deal is tempting but I don't know. For someone who's watched F1 since the late 70's paying such a premium really grates. Kinda' just...wrong.

That's "only" 652k viewers who are paying for it.

1.9 million that is free with anyone that has a license and an aerial to pick up signals is a poor number in comparison.
 
OP
OP
Aiii

Aiii

何これ
Member
Oct 24, 2017
8,190
Couple of news items.

First, off, Formula E has a DRIVER OF THE DAY now:

And VER won, of course!

---
Secondly, and this is great news as far as I'm concerned:

I know people gave Nico shit for saying "For Sure" a lot, but he had tremendous insight and analysis during his appearance last year, and I'm glad we get more of it.
 

zeknurn

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,270
The addition of Rosberg is a massive upgrade to the Sky F1 lineup. They needed someone more than Di Resta who has competed in F1 the last 20 years and has more relevant insights to the sport.
 
OP
OP
Aiii

Aiii

何これ
Member
Oct 24, 2017
8,190
Yeah, adding Symonds last year was a great move for that same reason, great insights into current era F1 workings. Nico had a similar contribution last year, so I'm glad to get more of it.
 

ODD

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,225
I don't think that being fresh out of F1 is that relevant in terms of insight quality. Here in Brazil we have Luciano Burti (an irrelevant F1 driver) and Max Wilson (who was no more than a test driver 20 years ago) and their insights are very good usually. Barrichello, on the other hand, was kind of bad (he didn't last long on TV). :P
 

Ty4on

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,953
Norway
Rosberg is also a good driver who really practiced hard to beat Lewis.

this is not meant to be bait lol
 

endlessflood

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
8,693
Australia (GMT+10)
Mark was hard done by which I'll get into later, but he fucked up too. His slow starts often compromised chances to win at the front, the crash in Korea was his fault, and the poor qualifying in Abu Dhabi put his chance away.
Korea was where he lost the title IMHO. With a win there I think the team would've shifted focus to him (rather than Vettel) for the remainder of the season, and that would've been enough to secure the title.
 

xrnzaaas

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
4,125
So Rosberg wanted time with his family, but now he'll be travelling everywhere just like the drivers? I know he doesn't have to work simulator, attend PR gigs and all that stuff but it's still a time consuming job.
 

Goldrusher

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
251
Flanders, BE
I don't think that being fresh out of F1 is that relevant in terms of insight quality. Here in Brazil we have Luciano Burti (an irrelevant F1 driver) and Max Wilson (who was no more than a test driver 20 years ago) and their insights are very good usually. Barrichello, on the other hand, was kind of bad (he didn't last long on TV). :P
In Belgium we've had active drivers.

2013: Jerôme d'Ambrosio
2014: Charles Pic
2016: Stoffel Vandoorne (and when he was racing, Esteban Ocon took over)
2017: Pierre Gasly

(rtbf)
 
Last edited:

Ty4on

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,953
Norway
So Rosberg wanted time with his family, but now he'll be travelling everywhere just like the drivers? I know he doesn't have to work simulator, attend PR gigs and all that stuff but it's still a time consuming job.
I can imagine the mental stress is completely different as a commentator. Does he need to be there for the full race weekend too like he did as a driver?

We have nobody because lol Norwegian racing :'(
The commentators even had a long discussion once about the dire state of racing in Norway
 

Slackbladder

Member
Nov 24, 2017
1,146
Kent
That's "only" 652k viewers who are paying for it.

1.9 million that is free with anyone that has a license and an aerial to pick up signals is a poor number in comparison.
And what do the advertisers and sponsors think? They pay millions for how many bums on seats? Any chance they may simply look at the figures and think "Hang on, we're not getting much coverage" and pull out, there-by making it harder for teams (usually the lower ones) to get money. And it's only that low because the majority of the races aren't live nor show practice etc. I don't know, if it were closer to 1 million on Sky I would say it was a success. But how can Formula 1 grow its fan base with such paltry numbers? Honestly, carrying on like this in 20 years or so they'll be significantly less viewers and lower crowd numbers because they'll all be dead (I'm 48 for example)!
 

Peek-a-boo!

Member
Oct 30, 2017
4,196
Woodbridge
Now TV have a great package for UK-era F1 peoples. https://www.nowtv.com/watch-f1-online I still think *other* than race commentary, I prefer the channel 4 talent team.

You know, I thought this was a pretty good price for an entire F1 season, seeing as Sky has ten or eleven live races, and a weeks pass is £13 at a time = £143 in all.

Then I realised that it is EVERYTHING on Sky Sports for that duration of time!

Thank you so very much for letting us UK folks know about this.
 

DBT85

Resident Thread Mechanic
Member
Oct 26, 2017
16,289
Glad to realise that this weekend is race weekend. With a small child I'll probably be awake to watch it live anyway so no bother for me!

So Rosberg wanted time with his family, but now he'll be travelling everywhere just like the drivers? I know he doesn't have to work simulator, attend PR gigs and all that stuff but it's still a time consuming job.
Rocking up to do a Saturday and Sunday is a lot less work than being an actual driver. Especially the effort it took for him to sabotage so many of Hamiltons engines that year :P

That's "only" 652k viewers who are paying for it.

1.9 million that is free with anyone that has a license and an aerial to pick up signals is a poor number in comparison.
The numbers are terrible when you consider that at times the BBC coverage could pull in 6m viewers. Though I seem to recall that the new boys have already said that the deal they inherited from Bernie for viewership in the UK is terrible as far as they are concerned because its behind a paywall from 2019 till 2024.
 

mute

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 25, 2017
25,107
Is the streaming service going to launch....or? Have I missed something?
 

Staab

Member
Oct 28, 2017
541
I'm hoping they push those out by Thursday for Free Practice...

What a missed opportunity it will be if F1 TV comes out after Melbourne !!
 

dubc

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,423
Seattle
Is the streaming service going to launch....or? Have I missed something?
I think it's been labeled by Liberty as soon for computers and later on for mobile devices so I wouldn't expect them to be ready for Albert Park, unfortunately.

eyQXIai.gif
 

DBT85

Resident Thread Mechanic
Member
Oct 26, 2017
16,289
Its not uncommon for services like this to not make it for the launch of a thing. A decision is taken at some point to greenlight the project, and inevitably the pen pushers that do it don't listen to the people who actually have to make it work. So they decide a bit late, the project maybe hits a few snags and before you know it you've missed the start of the season.
 

Dan

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,961
The numbers are terrible when you consider that at times the BBC coverage could pull in 6m viewers. Though I seem to recall that the new boys have already said that the deal they inherited from Bernie for viewership in the UK is terrible as far as they are concerned because its behind a paywall from 2019 till 2024.

Yep. Both the BBC and ITV were regularly pulling in 3m per race, going up to 8 to 8.5m in the Prime Time races (USA, Interlagos). You can pull the Sky numbers aside, but that doesnt account for 400k viewers on average compared to those days - and a lot of that can be put down to the shitty show that F1 is putting on. The move away from V8s was terrible for that.
 

DBT85

Resident Thread Mechanic
Member
Oct 26, 2017
16,289
Yep. Both the BBC and ITV were regularly pulling in 3m per race, going up to 8 to 8.5m in the Prime Time races (USA, Interlagos). You can pull the Sky numbers aside, but that doesnt account for 400k viewers on average compared to those days - and a lot of that can be put down to the shitty show that F1 is putting on. The move away from V8s was terrible for that.
Eh, I honestly can't say the at the change from v8 to v6 has caused the drop (with relation to the noise which is what I guess you mean?).

When you can only watch half the season live, a lot people probably just don't bother at all, or will find ways of watching on a stream for free.

The shitty show, sure. That its taken this long for anyone to get close to Mercedes is a credit to Mercedes, but also a huge detriment to the sport. Maybe were it Alonso or Vettel that had been in the other Merc, things might have been a bit more exciting.
 

chuckddd

Member
Oct 25, 2017
23,140
Do you guys normally make predictions in here? Well, I'm going to.

Constructor's

Mercedes - Even if they aren't the strongest to begin the season, they've shown they can develop throughout.
Ferrari - That oil smoke is concerning with the new regulations, but I think their engine will be reliable enough to beat...
Red Bull - I do think they'll get their fair share of podiums.
Renault - Their power supply will be magically more robust than their customers'.
Force India - Both drivers are good and the engine will make up for some other deficiencies.
Haas - Let's see how fast last year's Ferrari is. I expect a strong start and then a downturn.
McLaren - It'll be rough for a bit, but I think they'll get it sorted.
Toro Rosso - Even if Honda gives them plenty of power and reliability, the drivers won't be able to capitalize.
Williams - It's a mess.
Sauber - It's a messier mess.

Driver's

Lewis Hamilton - Best driver, best car
Max Verstappen - All the troubles hit Danny this year
Valteri Bottas - Best car
 

dubc

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,423
Seattle
I'd mostly agree; nothing too shocking on that list. I think McLaren finishes above Haas. McLaren is shit but I think they will get it sorted enough to beat Haas. Haas will have brake issues related to the Ferrari wind tunnel issues (I guess that meme has run it's course?)

It's the fifth year of the formula, in which few have been able to get developmental gains against Mercedes, so let's hope for some surprises this weekend and the rest of the year! F1 is back! (almost lol)
 

DBT85

Resident Thread Mechanic
Member
Oct 26, 2017
16,289
Burning oil isn't illegal. You're just not allowed to vent it into the airbox and the limit is stricter.
I know its not illegal, but they can only burn 600ml per 100km, and they weren't producing any smoke at all last year when the limit was much looser. To deliberately change your design so that you are now pointing a huge arrow at your engine because plumes of smoke fall out of the exhaust, when its an area where the FIA can and will happily drop the limit even further just seems daft. It sure as shit isn't the petrol making the smoke.
 

Ty4on

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,953
Norway
I know its not illegal, but they can only burn 600ml per 100km, and they weren't producing any smoke at all last year when the limit was much looser. To deliberately change your design so that you are now pointing a huge arrow at your engine because plumes of smoke fall out of the exhaust, when its an area where the FIA can and will happily drop the limit even further just seems daft. It sure as shit isn't the petrol making the smoke.
We don't know what is causing it, but one factor pointed out is that Ferrari's outlet is far from the exhaust and much colder than the other engines where the outlet is heated by the exhaust. That could be a big factor as the others might have a similar amount coming, just evaporated.
 

FriskyCanuck

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,063
Toronto, Canada
"Marcus Armstrong (ITA)"

That has to be the most unItalian name in history. Even googling I found he's from New Zealand and raced in a New Zealand series. I'm really curious lol
He's a Ferrari junior, maybe he's trying to endear himself to the Tifosi lol. Marino Sato is Japanese but is listed as Sanmarinese. Robert Schwartzman isn't exactly a typical Russian name either.
 

Deleted member 40133

User requested account closure
Banned
Feb 19, 2018
6,095
He's a Ferrari junior, maybe he's trying to endear himself to the Tifosi lol. Marino Sato is Japanese but is listed as Sanmarinese. Robert Schwartzman isn't exactly a typical Russian name either.

Ferrari junior I noticed, yes. Can they just declare any nationality they want? I realize it's not a big deal like a passport obviously but it just feels weird lol