• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Deleted member 1287

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
613
He did it for me.
For Bán.
For my mates.
For maybe a couple million more players.
Why aren't we allowed to have a great character that is also hot?
Please let u be. Why aren't we allowed to have this escpecially made for us?
Quiet is such an unbelievably small part of all gaming, that maybe you can think hey, you know what, let those guys have their Quiet.
ffs it's not that it shouldn't be allowed
it's that it was done poorly and we have the right to criticize it
Quiet is hot yes but god the execution was so dumb
And stop acting like games and other media don't pander to men's wallets more than anything else
 

Chaparral

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
787
Canada
heh. it's 2017 and dudes are still extremely Not Mad about basic feminist criticism.

bunch of intellectually dishonest bullshit in these last few pages. and despite many people going out of their way to assuage through fragile egos of men they still come in here and whine about not being allowed to enjoy things.

This is pretty much the crux of the issue. And it goes to show why arguing this topic is so frustrating when people are so bull headed they can't even see the sort of sexualization that has become par for the course in games.
 

StoveOven

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
1,234
He did it for me.
For Bán.
For my mates.
For maybe a couple million more players.
Why aren't we allowed to have a great character that is also hot?
Please let u be. Why aren't we allowed to have this escpecially made for us?
Quiet is such an unbelievably small part of all gaming, that maybe you can think hey, you know what, let those guys have their Quiet.
This would almost be sad if it wasn't so fucking disgusting
 

Kinthey

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
22,249
Really? I'm no expert on porn, but I could have sworn interracial porn contained a lot of racial stereotypes...
Which is something that's often criticized, and I'd be surprised if there are many people who take offense at Michael Bays racial stereotypes in transformers but are cool with the porn stereotypes.

Regardless, porn and non-porn media should certainly not be held to the same critical standards. Seems to me that this is self-evident...
There's certain stuff that wont fly in either. If the playboy prints a highly racist essay there'll be outrage, no matter if it's a porn magazine or not.
 

Aomame

Member
Oct 27, 2017
475
The second fallacy of the argument thus becomes apparent, as showcased by your playboy analogy, in that if we look at the wider world outside of the video game industry, sexualization is not only around us, but it is traditionally celebrated.
By who? Men.

Women may sexualize themselves for various reasons, a major one being that society teaches them that that is how they gain worth or value.

There are so many factors, social and industry-related, as to why women are a minority in gaming culture. Shitty treatment of female characters is but one, and it's symptomatic. Games perpetuate harmful stereotypes of women and makes women feel uncomfortable, so they don't play those games. Games allow male players to treat female characters like shit and they, by extension, think it's okay to treat actual women like shit (objectifying them and otherwise). When these male gamers interact with women, women feel uncomfortable, and so they don't play games with these men (or at all). It goes on and on. This is merely one of the easiest attack points to help solve this pervasive issue.
 

Ferrs

Avenger
Oct 26, 2017
18,829
Pointing and laughing at your opponents is probably not going to convince them that you're right.

Nothing will. They just don't care. They want their tiddies and don't care about anything else. Atleast a few posters admited this, others are running in circles with stupid excuses and "whataboutisms".

I don't know how some women still enter this thread tbh, I'm a man and I'm already tired of going in circles.
 

Chaparral

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
787
Canada
Pointing and laughing at your opponents is probably not going to convince them that you're right.

When you get posts like this:

He did it for me.
For Bán.
For my mates.
For maybe a couple million more players.
Why aren't we allowed to have a great character that is also hot?
Please let u be. Why aren't we allowed to have this escpecially made for us?
Quiet is such an unbelievably small part of all gaming, that maybe you can think hey, you know what, let those guys have their Quiet.

that just so blatantly get things wrong, and shows why women talking about this subject in this thread get so frustrated, then the only real way to cope with it is humor.
 

Talraen

Member
Oct 27, 2017
268
Connecticut
Nothing will. They just don't care. They want their tiddies and don't care about anything else. Atleast a few posters admited this, others are running in circles with stupid excuses and "whataboutisms".

I've been convinced to change my mind on similar issues in the past. But not by being insulted.

How can you take someone seriously, when they're framing Kojima as a martyr for straight men.

I'm not? I'm trying to convince these people they're wrong. But with tactics that could actually work, rather than undoubtedly making the problem worse.
 

Ferrs

Avenger
Oct 26, 2017
18,829
I've been convinced to change my mind on similar issues in the past. But not by being insulted.

What does more it takes? We have stats of the problem of sexualization and objectification, we have women expressing their opinion and situation, we know about the huge problems with harassment in gaming (both in social media by other players and even by devs inside studios)....

... and we still run in circles. What more it takes? or maybe, as I said (and as someone here admited) they don't care.
 

Chaparral

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
787
Canada
What does more it takes? We have stats of the problem of sexualization and objectification, we have women expressing their opinion and situation, we know about the huge problems with harassment in gaming (both in social media by other players and even by devs inside studios)....

... and we still run in circles. What more it takes? or maybe, as I said (and as someone here admited) they don't care.

Exactly. This isn't a friendly debate in the high school debate club where somebody could be swayed by your opinion. When it comes to sexualization of women in gaming, and in the broader scope of things, the industry basically being hostile to women playing and working in it, it's obvious that most people don't care. Frankly, I, along with many others, are sick of it.
 

GhostTrick

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,297
He did it for me.
For Bán.
For my mates.
For maybe a couple million more players.
Why aren't we allowed to have a great character that is also hot?
Please let u be. Why aren't we allowed to have this escpecially made for us?
Quiet is such an unbelievably small part of all gaming, that maybe you can think hey, you know what, let those guys have their Quiet.


Because she is neither a great character or have a hot design. She's cring af. It's not hot, it's cringe. It's ridiculous. It's dumb.
 

Talraen

Member
Oct 27, 2017
268
Connecticut
What does more it takes? We have stats of the problem of sexualization and objectification, we have women expressing their opinion and situation, we know about the huge problems with harassment in gaming (both in social media by other players and even by devs inside studios)....

... and we still run in circles. What more it takes? or maybe, as I said (and as someone here admited) they don't care.

I am not, generally speaking, an expert on winning arguments. I am just speaking from personal experience. But I believe that if your aim is actually to convince people, you're going to have to reiterate the same arguments in perpetuity. You're basically never going to convince anyone to the point where they concede the point on a forum. But you can educate them, and some people will think about your arguments when they're no longer in an argumentative mood, and change little by little. But "god, I just gave you the facts, how can you not see them?" is not going to work.
 

anyprophet

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
941
Pointing and laughing at your opponents is probably not going to convince them that you're right.
nothing is going to convince people like our friend cid over here. and I think there are a lot of valid ways to address them without resorting to ad hominem. if joking about a completely ridiculous statement is going to turn you off of an argument you weren't going to buy that argument to begin with.
 

StallionDan

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
7,705
Games allow male players to treat female characters like shit and they, by extension, think it's okay to treat actual women like shit (objectifying them and otherwise).

This is some Jack Thompson GTA turns people into murderers nonsense.

If you think people are so incapable of separating media and fiction from reality like this then videogames are the tiniest problem in a ocean of them.
 
Oct 27, 2017
951
By who? Men.

Women may sexualize themselves for various reasons, a major one being that society teaches them that that is how they gain worth or value.

There are so many factors, social and industry-related, as to why women are a minority in gaming culture. Shitty treatment of female characters is but one, and it's symptomatic. Games perpetuate harmful stereotypes of women and makes women feel uncomfortable, so they don't play those games. Games allow male players to treat female characters like shit and they, by extension, think it's okay to treat actual women like shit (objectifying them and otherwise). When these male gamers interact with women, women feel uncomfortable, and so they don't play games with these men (or at all). It goes on and on. This is merely one of the easiest attack points to help solve this pervasive issue.

Look, if you want to make the argument that a woman's sexuality has no worth apart from what a man puts on it, you're free to. I disagree.

But then you're going to have to slut-shame every single woman who chooses to cosplay as Quiet or Cid or Bayonetta or any of the other examples that have been raised in this thread in order to remain consistent. And you can't do that because that would put you in the same league as many of the same people that you hate (protestors outside abortion clinics, the Westborough Bapist Chruch, etc.), because if the stereotypes are REALLY that harmful shouldn't we step up and start challenging those female cosplayers as well?

And then this the tactic of "whataboutism" arises. When we take the accusations that these stereotypes are "harmful" and then apply greater scrutiny to them or look at them outside of actual video games, they fall apart. And the reason they fall apart is that the intended goal isn't to reduce sexualization it's to increase the number of women playing video games. Otherwise, when confronted with the sexualization in a Fifth Harmony video, a video that has 1.7 billion views, you start to have trouble explaining why women aren't uncomfortable supporting that (or the cosplayer references above). The reason is simple: sexuality isn't the problem. The barrier to entry isn't sexuality. It's gameplay.

music-video-fifth-harmony-work-from-home-58a500b0ce110d65804723cb-g.gif
 

Aomame

Member
Oct 27, 2017
475
This is some Jack Thompson GTA turns people into murderers nonsense.
I'm sure this came up earlier in the thread, but media creates culture and culture creates media. That culture affects you. It doesn't have to be taken to the extreme of actually murdering someone, but it certainly shapes our perceptions of violence and acceptable behavior. I don't believe it's any coincidence that gaming is one of the most toxic industries toward women and that it treats female characters like garbage. The culture is permissive of these attitudes and so they continue.
 

Chaparral

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
787
Canada
This is some Jack Thompson GTA turns people into murderers nonsense.

If you think people are so incapable of separating media and fiction from reality like this then videogames are the tiniest problem in a ocean of them.

Even though that's proven to be true, considering the proliferation of Gamergaters and alt-right types in gaming?
 

Lime

Banned for use of an alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,266
This is some Jack Thompson GTA turns people into murderers nonsense.

If you think people are so incapable of separating media and fiction from reality like this then videogames are the tiniest problem in a ocean of them.

The misogyny in video games certainly attracts a lot of misogynists. Just look at online harassment, sexism at game conferences, organized terror campaigns against women, the ways that women are silenced in discussions (like this thread), the ways that women are erased throughout gaming history, and on and on and on. Video games culture has a huge problem with the way that (male) games and developers treat women (and other groups for that matter) and the more harassment campaigns and the more refusal to learn, the more male gamers and devs prove that they don't care about women and would rather treat them as pleasurable objects for consumption than actual human beings.
 

anyprophet

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
941
This is some Jack Thompson GTA turns people into murderers nonsense.

If you think people are so incapable of separating media and fiction from reality like this then videogames are the tiniest problem in a ocean of them.

yeah. no one became a sexist by playing a sexist game. they were already sexist and the game, as well as most of the other media they consume, reinforce that sexism. we live in a sexist society that is structured to oppress and disadvantage women. it's represented in the things we make, including art.

the way you overcome it is you criticize it, raise people's awareness of it and hope they reflect on the decisions they make and actions they take.
 

Htown

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,317
He did it for me.
For Bán.
For my mates.
For maybe a couple million more players.
Why aren't we allowed to have a great character that is also hot?
Please let u be. Why aren't we allowed to have this escpecially made for us?
Quiet is such an unbelievably small part of all gaming, that maybe you can think hey, you know what, let those guys have their Quiet.
You deserve better.
 

Lime

Banned for use of an alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,266
Nothing will. They just don't care. They want their tiddies and don't care about anything else. Atleast a few posters admited this, others are running in circles with stupid excuses and "whataboutisms".

I don't know how some women still enter this thread tbh, I'm a man and I'm already tired of going in circles.

Yeah that's where I have been for some time by now:

A significant portion of male gamers have made it abundantly clear that they refuse to listen to women and instead would rather have their dicks get hard than make games an inclusive, non-misogynist space. After years of open public misogyny, male gamers still want to dominate and exclude, because virtual tits and ass are more important than the well-being of other people. Thousands of personal testimonies, decades of academic research, and hundreds of well-written thinkpieces and feature articles have all proven and shown the misogyny in games culture. But nothing happens and we are still in the same position as before.

And if women still voice their experiences, they are met with harassment, doxxing, and silencing from the gamer nazi to the "I just want to discuss the validity of your personal experience" male gamer. And then you have the unaffected gamer on the sidelines who just wish 'they could go back to talking about games' , i.e. have women shut up.

I am personally done with giving any more reasonable doubt to posters who "just want to debate" while we have rampant misogyny in video games industry and culture and people fear for their safety. People's life experiences is not up to debate and it's not funny or an intellectual exercise, it's everyday sexism reproduced over and over again that hurts and marginalizes. And yes, the overall amount of 'your' video game waifus designed to get your dick hard implicitly foster alienating spaces, whether you like it or not.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
No, like....I'm not trying to shit talk you. I'm just saying, much like myself (apparently, I don't see it but whatever), you've answered your own question. It's the literal topic of this thread. But yet you feel the need to ask it anyway. As if we both already don't know the answer.

Well, at least I'm asking things without calling people dense, or like spman2099 trying to pin potential racism acceptance on people in a roundabout way. I don't mind people feeling the need to ask me things they think they already know the answer to. I pretty much respond to everyone that talks to me.

Yes, debating about things people are totally set in stone around/feel emotional about can lead to emotions running high, anger, frustration and so on. Sometimes even disgust/hate of others. As I said this is a forum, you're going to come up across lots of diverse opinions that aren't the same as yours. Considering Morrigan has pointed it out and linked it multiple times, I know you and others are in a community topic saying people you've not directly named have made you not want to take part in this topic. Okay, I said sorry earlier to the OP if they feel their original idea for the topic has gone to areas they didn't plan for. However, I personally think 22 pages of a debate is quite healthy for a forum, and I'm sure some are reading along and having "fun". You're never going to create such a fiercely debated topic such as this and have 22 pages of nodding and agreeing. The best you can hope for is people read, some might learn and at the end of the day, maybe some just have fun arguing about things. Arguing can be about fun, it doesn't always have to be about literally converting every dissenting view to yours over to your side. I know you'll know all of that, but it goes without saying this has been the bedrock of forums since they existed. 25,000+ people aren't all going to agree with each other, and even want to be friends. I don't think anyone has 25,000 friends! It's just worth everyone always being reminded an avatar is another human being, and a disagreement of opinion isn't necessarily someone saying they don't like you.

I argue and debate for myself, that much should be obvious. I enjoy it. I type very quickly, like scarily quickly, and yes this can lead to long posts. On a forum where some complain about one-liner drivebys and shitposts, then others complain about having to read walls of text, you can't win. For disclosure, I'm not running off to communities or private messaging apps and saying "this poster is X and I hate them". Occasionally, people PM me, but I don't care for moaning much about people I don't know. That's just my personality. Surprisingly, I actually relish being around people who think differently than me and engaging in heated debates with them. Always best to try and get to know people, even those you might disagree with. There's the crux of the issue on most forums, you don't really know who you're talking to, other than an avatar and some of the opinions they might share. Community topics and private messaging tend to exist on forums to create safer spaces. I don't mean that in a detrimental way. Having a timeout amongst a group of people who think like you are obviously part of relaxing as a human. It's less stressful to be around company that heavily think alike. That's usually how people choose actual friends.

I think there are lots of people who can be immature and downright hostile in topics like this. I don't disagree there. Take a look across the internet at any article about sex in gaming and see 1,000+ replies around SJWs, feminism, etc. That's sad. I would hope for as much as I know I make "enemies" on forums because people don't like what I say at times, they know I do not behave like that. Psychology is my line of study, and yes, as much as I'm an emotional person, personally, sometimes when it comes to science/biology/psychology I can be a little more stats, evidence and facts based. Politically I'm very liberal as well, to the point where as long as others aren't hurting anyone I don't care too much what they do in their personal lives. I completely accept and understand how people use fantasy, and fantasy isn't necessarily an endorsement of personal behaviour. I'm more interested in knowing WHY people might do certain things/watch/play/etc, what makes their brain tick, what's the evidence for it and so on. Rather than me implying moral implications of what people do in their bedrooms or behind closed doors.

Education and understanding is always more important to me, as often I think that actually naturally raises the social behaviour and acceptance of others to higher levels. Hence why discussions around male aggression, anti-social behaviour, threats and toxic masculinity routinely have me arguing about understanding why these men may be behaving how they are, and trying to highlight the role of early education to try and combat some of it going forward. More so than me being the kind of poster who just stops in to say "what a bunch of fucking assholes, fuck them all". I don't think there's anything wrong with people posting like that if it's about twitter/youtube abusers, I'm just trying to highlight how my brain ticks. I want to know why they're doing it, what trends follow them around, their social and personal status, their education, their parent upbringing, etc, and then cross-correlate that with attempted solutions to tackle people in positions many of them often are (low-status males/incredibly bitter and angry at the world/lacking in confidence/hating and resenting women because they have unsuccessful love lives/etc).

spman2099 also criticised me for saying all the above meaning I'm being "too neutral", but okay, I take that on board. Hopefully the above shows I know my intent is more about how brains tick, than making more personal or emotional statements. Given me also saying I don't particularly care too much about what people get up to in their personal lives, obviously sexual content may not disgust or offend me as much as others. I know that's a bias of mine due to the liberal stance I take. Ironically, sexualised video game content doesn't do much for me personally, I'm just not that personally impacted by it. I know that immediately makes some want to say "oh that's because you're a male and you don't give a shit about women", but that is sometimes the knee-jerk kind of personality hits I find quite belittling on a forum at times. I understand others feel differently from me, and that's absolutely fine. Me challenging some of these people doesn't mean I disagree with their right to speak and criticise, or that I even completely disagree with their opinion, I just like debating and figuring out what makes their brains tick and why it might be different than mine. I've routinely said in most of these conversations I WANT more diversity in the gaming industry, and a large part of that is within games development. Having people that actually make the games, if they can get financial backing, be diverse in thought and opinion, will naturally mean more games will be attempted to be created that aren't all carbon copies of each other.

Me believing that though doesn't mean I don't feel a nuanced understanding of why large parts of this industry safely cater for male gamers and it works, sales-wise, should be attempted to be discussed. Gamers are just sexist and only care about tits and don't like women's voices doesn't quite do it for me. I think it's a bit more complex than that, when discussing tens of millions of people, even if that sentence does apply to some gamers. I think you'll hopefully find most male gamers in this topic aren't from the women-hating/sexist camps, hence why their opinions around sexuality and why they like it might not be mirroring with pre-conceived beliefs to like Quiet (or other examples) must imply something about your personality/treatment of women. I've asked a few such gamers in here to elaborate on why they like visual sexual stimulation in games, and they have. None of it on face value was I see women as lesser than me and/or women are just tits and ass for my pleasure. I don't know them personally to confirm how they behave in real life, but the answers they gave are all the information I have to go on.
 
Last edited:

Pirate Bae

Edelgard Feet Appreciator
The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
6,792
??
This is some Jack Thompson GTA turns people into murderers nonsense.

If you think people are so incapable of separating media and fiction from reality like this then videogames are the tiniest problem in a ocean of them.
You've never had a man treat you like an IRL waifu to be objectified and harassed because "if video games do it, it must be okay for me to do it too."

You seriously underestimate the power of socially awkward nerds and sexually frustrated meninists.
 

MaskedNdi

Member
Oct 25, 2017
294
I am not, generally speaking, an expert on winning arguments. I am just speaking from personal experience. But I believe that if your aim is actually to convince people, you're going to have to reiterate the same arguments in perpetuity. You're basically never going to convince anyone to the point where they concede the point on a forum. But you can educate them, and some people will think about your arguments when they're no longer in an argumentative mood, and change little by little. But "god, I just gave you the facts, how can you not see them?" is not going to work.

This thread opens with a detailed, well-reasoned argument, and many posters have continued to debate this issue throughout the thread. It is unfair to ignore all of that and single out people losing patience with a poster on page 23 of the thread.

And then this the tactic of "whataboutism" arises. When we take the accusations that these stereotypes are "harmful" and then apply greater scrutiny to them or look at them outside of actual video games, they fall apart. And the reason they fall apart is that the intended goal isn't to reduce sexualization it's to increase the number of women playing video games. Otherwise, when confronted with the sexualization in a Fifth Harmony video, a video that has 1.7 billion views, you start to have trouble explaining why women aren't uncomfortable supporting that (or the cosplayer references above). The reason is simple: sexuality isn't the problem. The barrier to entry isn't sexuality. It's gameplay.

Some of the women in that video have talked about being uncomfortable with how they were pushed to perform sexual content at a young age. If your point is that objectification is an issue in other entertainment mediums, then I agree. This thread is focused on video games because this is a video game message board.
 
Last edited:
Oct 27, 2017
951
Assholes exist everywhere. Games don't create them.

This is another tactic used where they first try to associate you with the worst of the worst and then character assassinate you into either have your onion dismissed or get you banned. Lime did it by more or less attempting to associate any criticism of the argument with being a Nazi. Well obviously everyone hates Nazi, so the easiest way to discussion shut down, dissenters enraged, and likely excommunicated is for him to go right for that accusation. It's intellectually dishonest.
 
Oct 27, 2017
951
This thread opens with a detailed, well-reasoned argument, and many posters have continued to debate this issue throughout the thread. It is unfair to ignore out of that and single out people losing patience with a poster on page 23 of the thread.

Some of the women in that video have talked about being uncomfortable with how they were pushed to perform sexual content at a young age. If your point is that objectification is an issue in other entertainment mediums, then I agree. This thread is focused on video games because this is a video game message board.

The argument is that sexualization harms women outside of video games. Therefore, we should look at causes, effects, and acceptance of sexualization outside of videogames as well and discuss any fallacies that arise in that argument in a result. Video games don't exist in a void.
 

Lime

Banned for use of an alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,266
Assholes exist everywhere. Games don't create them.

They certainly create and foster spaces with certain norms and expectations. And they certainly attract people who are into such norms and expectations.

There's a reason why the video games industry and culture have had so many public misogynist cases in addition to all the research on how women are treated in these spaces (as well as the testimonies of women themselves here in this thread and elsewhere). I mean, look no further than this thread and the amount of replies it has spawned to give an indication of the topic of women in games.
 

Htown

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,317
This is some Jack Thompson GTA turns people into murderers nonsense.

If you think people are so incapable of separating media and fiction from reality like this then videogames are the tiniest problem in a ocean of them.
Well I guess all the governments and religions and political parties who wasted their effort on propaganda throughout history should have found a better use of their time, since media doesn't do anything.

People never take lessons from fiction. That never happens.

Come on.

Just for one example, you do know that Birth of a Nation basically restarted the Ku Klux Klan, right?
 

Bán

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,307
Back from lunch, let's have a run at these replies...

Ok, then ask youself this, why is she used in an explicit softcore porn fanservice? What purpose does this serve the story? This sheer disconnect is just one of the many reasons why Quiet is so reviled because despite her having a great character arc, the game's direction makes her to be nothing more than a fanservice object half the time.

Or, to put this in perspective, does anybody take seriously Megan Fox's character arc in the Transformers movies? She goes through the best arc out of any of the characters, she is one of the best human characters by a country mile of the movies she's is (granted, that's not saying much). And yet, no one remember her for anything but as a sex object because the camera does nothing but frame as her such. Any depth in the film is rendered meaningless because the camera and direction are still important parts of the story.

And that's the problem with your defense of Quiet. You cannot segment this. It does not matter if she goes through a character arc, even a great one, if many other elements in play are actively running against the story. From the camera's leering male gaze to the lore's breaking in two (seriously, The End wasn't in a thong and that was like a decade ago), the elements of the game clash viciously with the plot. This is why, in despite of all of Quiet's positives, she is still reduced to nothing but tits and ass by the very game itself.

Why is she used in an explicit softcore porn fanservice is a question that answers itself. Because the creator thinks that the fans will like it. To service the fans. And because he likes it, no doubt.

It serves no story purpose whatsoever - it's patently ridiculous. Of course, everything in MGS is patently ridiculous so that doesn't bother me. If you consider MGS 'great, serious storytelling' that Quiet's fanservice design interrupts, then we're starting from very different viewpoints. The only well-written Metal Gear is MGS3, and even there you've got dudes shooting hornets out of their mouths and bisexual abusers who crackle with lightning and you're supposed to accept it. So when you say that her design clashes viciously with the plot, I say 'Not really, not in this absurd story. At this stage I'm conditioned to accept anything.' This isn't The Last of Us here, where such a design would absolutely ruin the game and run contrary to the entire ethos and theme of what the story is going for. In MGS - which has had a history of sexualised designs anyway - this absurd design just doesn't feel that out of place.

As for Transformers, I haven't seen it so I can't speak for that characters arc.

...Are you really saying that it's the female feminist critics of Quiet are the real sexists here?

Of course not - I don't casually throw around accusations of sexism.

I'm just saying that I can see Quiet holistically as a character, whereas others are reducing her to her body alone. It's not the game itself that 'reduces' her in such a way - as I described she is fleshed out both in gameplay and story - it's the people interpreting the game who objectify her in such a way.

heh. it's 2017 and dudes are still extremely Not Mad about basic feminist criticism.

bunch of intellectually dishonest bullshit in these last few pages. and despite many people going out of their way to assuage through fragile egos of men they still come in here and whine about not being allowed to enjoy things.

If you're going to post stuff like this call a specific post or user out. Who do you think is being dishonest? I don't see any of that in the last two pages at all, really, but maybe I missed it. I don't see how this helps the discussion though.

What character arc ? You mean the succession of cringeworthy cutscenes and waifu fetish Kojima had with the character ? Quiet is hands down the worst character in the MGS saga. We're talking about a saga which has seen Fatman.

I don't really want to write out her entire story here, but she goes from being a cold-hearted assassin in the first cutscene of the game to someone who is so affected by Snake and Kaz's sacrifices that she is willing to sacrifice everything for their ideals and their group by the end. Along the way you learn why she joins the Diamond Dogs and why she doesn't speak, which is a form of sacrifice in itself. You learn that her leaving the group is also a sacrifice. Now, it's not great stuff (pssst... Kojima's a shitty writer), but it was much more of an arc than anyone else had and her final scene where she saves Snake by calling Pequod at least got me to feel some emotion and empathy for her character, which is more than I can say about any other part of the story.
 

Z-Beat

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 25, 2017
31,827
This thread's still about why women wouldn't like character designs made specifically for ogling the character and promoting objectification, right?
 

PogiJones

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,636
Alright, as far as I'm concerned, "intellectually dishonest" has lost all its value as a valid criticism, because it's thrown around so much by everyone to impugn the motives of anyone who disagrees with them.

It's not intellectually dishonest to come to a different conclusion than you.

On topic: Things don't exist in a vacuum. Media we consume affects us--not always in obvious ways, or in the ways we'd expect (e.g. violent games don't necessarily cause a consumer to be more prone to violence)--but it does affect us. The isolationist thinking of "I like it, why can't you leave it alone" does encapsulate the values of an individualist society, but I don't think it reflects reality very well. We're social creatures. Even one's isolationist tendencies has an effect on those around him or her.
 

Dary

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,404
The English Wilderness
Assholes exist everywhere. Games don't create them.

But they attract them. Escapism and escapist hobbies appeal to narcissists. It gives them an opportunity to live out their entitlement fantasies and provides them with an avenue of validation and accomplishment they lack in the real world.

This includes entitlement towards women. Some of the nastiest, most misogynistic attitudes I've witnessed come from geeks and gamers who are convinced the world owes them a girlfriend, and are still angry that the girls they lusted after in high school "ignored" them.

https://www.newstatesman.com/laurie-penny/on-nerd-entitlement-rebel-alliance-empire
 

Lime

Banned for use of an alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
1,266
This is another tactic used where they first try to associate you with the worst of the worst and then character assassinate you into either have your onion dismissed or get you banned. Lime did it by more or less attempting to associate any criticism of the argument with being a Nazi. Well obviously everyone hates Nazi, so the easiest way to discussion shut down, dissenters enraged, and likely excommunicated is for him to go right for that accusation. It's intellectually dishonest.

kJP9vel.gif


Not sure what you're talking about here, but if it's the fact that my patience is thin for entertaining any more refusals to listen and learn after years of public terror campaigns, thousands of personal testimonies, and decades of research, then you're absolutely right that I have zero patience any longer. Either people are in support of diversity in games or they are implicitly supporting the misogynist status quo with their thickheaded arguments, gaslighting, and "just asking questions" as if this shit is up to debate.
 
Oct 27, 2017
951
Alright, as far as I'm concerned, "intellectually dishonest" has lost all its value as a valid criticism, because it's thrown around so much by everyone to impugn the motives of anyone who disagrees with them.

It's not intellectually dishonest to come to a different conclusion than you.

It is if you're calling someone a Nazi to shut down a discussion. I voted for Clinton. I voted Democrat down the line last night. Suggesting someone is a Nazi because Lime can't be bothered to have a discussion on a forum where we're supposed to discuss things might not be intellectually dishonest. But then I don't know what that something else is.
 

Pirate Bae

Edelgard Feet Appreciator
The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
6,792
??
Again, if that was an actual problem videogames aren't even close to being a major contributing factor to what affects society in such a away. It's complaining your shoes are getting wet when the ship is sinking.

Video games are a reflection of societal norms and standards. Video games perpetuate the problems that are normally swept under the rug in real life. "I'd never do that to my wife, I love women! But I'm totally cool with objectifying video game women for my own pleasure." Games, and media in general, definitely make the problem worse. They allow these toxic ideals and behaviors to grow, and you are naive if you think that guys don't actually creep out real women by treating them like waifus and projecting their gross views of sexualization onto them. I know it does, because it has happened to me many times.
 

Redcrayon

Patient hunter
On Break
Oct 27, 2017
12,713
UK
Seems weird to me that of all the dubious character designs people choose to defend to the bitter end, it's Quiet. The whole ripped fishnets and bra thing while framing a loose justification of 'you'll feel ashamed you felt that way!' followed by 'she needs to dress like that to breathe through her skin!'. When a male soldier with the exact same condition can wear normal combat gear rather than immediately selecting a spandex posing pouch and then washing while being eye-fucked by the camera. It's pretty much the definition of silly combat lingerie and criticism of that shouldn't be surprising.
 

Chaparral

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
787
Canada
It is if you're calling someone a Nazi to shut down a discussion. I voted for Clinton. I voted Democrat down the line last night. Suggesting someone is a Nazi because Lime can't be bothered to have a discussion on a forum where we're supposed to discuss things might not be intellectually dishonest. But then I don't know what that something else is.

On the bolded: Lime is having a discussion. In fact, a well versed one. It's being drowned out however by people going 'not all men!' and trying to justify sexualization so they can continue to fap.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.