• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Garlador

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
14,131
It's been a hell of a thing to see people who I thought genuine in their faith fall over themselves to support someone so morally dissipated, nakedly venal, and consumed by greed. If Trump worships any god, it's Mammon, and he is not subtle about it.
golden-calf-2.jpg

The most devoutly religious can still fall sway to the worship of a Golden Calf...

... There's a "Trump Steaks" joke in there somewhere.
 

Jack Remington

User requested permanent ban
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,083
"God uses flawed champions. Just look at Samson or even King David!"

I attended a church service last year where the sermon was all about Samson as a flawed vessel for God's work. Trump was never mentioned by name, but the subtext was clear.

Btw, they see us as the Philistines.
 

4859

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,046
In the weak and the wounded
For me, one clip kind of summarizes this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ul2OuvPOQE

Trump, to me, is the inevitable byproduct of a system where character arguments and labels are used to win what should be political, idea driven discussion. Just because you might disagree with someone else's vision for where the city/state/country needs to go doesn't automatically make them immoral. Words matter, and applying them to people you disagree with solely because you disagree with them means that those words matter less.

It becomes more understandable if you approach it from the perspective of 'if they're going to label X candidate for Y party with these horrible, nasty labels because they are running against Z party, then the thing we need most is someone capable of punching back against those labels and the people trying to apply them'. Whatever you might say of Trump, at this point he's a mud monster. No amount of mud people throw will stick to him (even when it should).

Two things can be true at once, and the other part is that it's difficult to say that morals matter to you and then be OK with what Trump does.

What I really hope comes out of all this is wider applications of the following two scenarios:

1) There is one standard (phrased in terms of yes/no questions with little wiggle room), and we hold everyone to it.
2) We stop demonizing people we disagree with. Before we apply a label, take a breath, and a few minutes, and try to set our disagreement with said person aside. Then, if the label applies, then apply it.

That's some in depth reasoning and rationalizing you did there.

But it' just not true.

These peoe are for Trump, because he is like them. They are shitbags, deplorable, disgusting people, they don't see him as a tool to punch back against party z.

He is the embodiment of their actual values.

Their lip service is exactly that, it's just fucking lip service.
 

Crimson-Death

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,515
Purgatory
American Christianity is its own brand of disgusting and idiocy. Gee, who would've thunk they'd follow morally reprehensible and corrupt leaders, oh jeez.
 

Occam

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,510
I'm religious and I believe in a strong separation of church and state, but:

If religion is man made, so is politics, there are no politics in nature, right? (nor is religion found in nature). Or are you just wanting to make a statement that religion does not belong in politics (with which I agree)? If that's the case just say that.
Religion has no basis in reality and should therefore have no influence on politics, which should be rational, based on facts and evidence.
 

Garlador

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
14,131
"God uses flawed champions. Just look at Samson or even King David!"

I attended a church service last year where the sermon was all about Samson as a flawed vessel for God's work. Trump was never mentioned by name, but the subtext was clear.

Btw, they see us as the Philistines.
Samson also got himself captured, blinded, and ultimately committed suicide trying to take out as many of his enemies as possible. It blows my mind that Christians use him as an example of what to be, when he was clearly more of a cautionary tale that his own personal life was miserable, violent, and cut short.

And King David's sin literally led to civil wars and generations of his children trying to butcher each other.

God can use flawed people, but he never asks us to ignore the flaws. Old Testament champions sinned and got HARSHLY punished for it, along with the nations they championed.
 

Svadhyaya

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
1,125
"God uses flawed champions. Just look at Samson or even King David!"

I attended a church service last year where the sermon was all about Samson as a flawed vessel for God's work. Trump was never mentioned by name, but the subtext was clear.

Btw, they see us as the Philistines.

"If God uses flawed vessels, why can't he work through Hilary Clinton or minorities?"
 

Elandyll

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
8,805
  1. You shall have no other Gods but me.
  2. You shall not make for yourself any idol, nor bow down to it or worship it.
  3. You shall not misuse the name of the Lord your God.
  4. You shall remember and keep the Sabbath day holy.
  5. Respect your father and mother.
  6. You must not commit murder.
  7. You must not commit adultery.
  8. You must not steal.
  9. You must not give false evidence against your neighbour.
  10. You must not be envious of your neighbour's goods. You shall not be envious of his house nor his wife, nor anything that belongs to your neighbour.

I mean... The only one I'm not sure Trump did was murder, and even then he was joking around about doing it and getting away with it...
 

Beer Monkey

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
9,308
They had an actual Christian president that had zero scandals and no skeletons in his closet and they hated him for being black and successful.

Evangelicals are not actual Christians.
 

FriedConsole

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,187
Can someone define what a evangelical is exactly? A charismatic protestant Christian? Or is it simply a Christian that is involved in politics? Would a Catholic that votes republican be an evangelical?

Non-Evangelicans go to a church with a steeple.

Evangelicals go to a church that looks like a movie theater.
 
Oct 28, 2017
2,700
Siloam Springs
Religion has no basis in reality and should therefore have no influence on politics, which should be rational, based on facts and evidence.

Based on your facts, we should cow-tow only to your beliefs eh? It's great that I have the freedom of choice to disagree with you and have religion in my life, all the while respect other's for their beliefs.

Anti religion, is still a belief, just as religion is a belief, and this setting to try to neg on someone's differing belief's is in fact very transparent.

Accept me for my differences, I accept you.

Non-Evangelicans go to a church with a steeple.

Evangelicals go to a church that looks like a movie theater.

I had not noticed that, I'm happy I visit a steeple!
 

4859

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,046
In the weak and the wounded
Based on your facts, we should cow-tow only to your beliefs eh? It's great that I have the freedom of choice to disagree with you and have religion in my life, all the while respect other's for their beliefs.

Anti religion, is still a belief, just as religion is a belief, and this setting to try to neg on someone's differing belief's is in fact very transparent.

Accept me for my differences, I accept you.

WHAT the hell does any of this have to do with what you quoted?
 

Boiled Goose

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
9,999
That's actually a pretty distorted belief of original Christianity, since a surplus of the faith's founders were people Jesus performed miracles in front of, demonstrated evidence of his divinity towards, and even many Christians misread passages, such as the one involving Thomas, that faith alone is what you need.

"Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed." Thomas, one of his 12 disciples, still needed to see him and touch him to believe in his resurrection, and many Christians interpret that as "all you need is faith" when it was more probable Jesus was merely saying it was to the credit of others who trusted in him and his prophesy that he'd rise again, heard of it, and chose to believe either Jesus or any of his friends that it had happened. A lot of the post-Gospel work is about how the the truth of what happened was beyond dispute because Jesus lingered on earth in big crowds for almost a hundred days or more after his resurrection to make his resurrection a well-known phenomenon.

"Faith without works is dead." "So Jesus said to him, "unless you see signs and wonders you will not believe."" "Thus tongues are a sign not for believers but for unbelievers, while prophecy is a sign not for unbelievers but for believers." Etc.

The Bible is filled with signs and evidence to prove the veracity of God's claims. The Gospel is full of passages that state that Christians should even ASK for signs to determine whether a prophet is truly from God or is a false prophet, to question what we are told and to not blindly follow doctrine without using the mind and logic we have. "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good."

Again, the Bible is the most popular unread book of all time, and it is beyond frustrating how many Christians have no idea what their faith is actually about, or who reject questions into their faith and doctrine. The very book they read asks them to do so, to question everything, to take efforts to prove its veracity. That "join us or go to hell" is NOT the message they were given (rather, it was to spread his commandments to them. You know, the "love thy neighbor" and "do good to others" and "turn the other cheek" stuff).

No true Scotsman the post unfortunately.
Every passage is subject to interpretation by the reader so it's basically a distorting ink blot test for what the trader wants to believe.

You give me those passages, and I'll give you passages that call for murdering atheists and homosexuals and you'll give me your interpretative apologetic response.

Your belief of what Christianity is, is not the correct one. There isn't a correct one because again it's interpretation from largely made up stories and tales.

And no, the Bible isn't filled with evidence. It's filled with claims.
Same with the witnessing of the founders. It's a claim.

If all it takes for you to believe magical stuff is claims, then that proves why people believe Trump. And kim jung un. And islam. And Mormonism. And cult leaders. Etc.
 

Shortt Sirket

Member
Oct 26, 2017
432
Indianapolis, IN

Christ Stroop and I went to the same religious school. He has been amazing on Twitter with his thoughts. Dude is legit brilliant.

If you ever want to see what lengths of intellectual dishonesty Evangelicals will go to, look up their version of the "camel through the eye of a needle" story. It is pathetic what they will contort in order to keep being greedy.
 

FeliciaFelix

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,778
Christians are already anti-religion and atheist... against the likes of Thor and Zeus. I'm Vikings loved Thor and tried their best to honor him, but that doesnt stop modern humans from thinking it's a fairy tale.

Passionate belief doesn't make things true. You can passionate believe in Zeus and it won't be any more real than any other gods from history.
 

Shortt Sirket

Member
Oct 26, 2017
432
Indianapolis, IN
Christians are already anti-religion and atheist... against the likes of Thor and Zeus. I'm Vikings loved Thor and tried their best to honor him, but that doesnt stop modern humans from thinking it's a fairy tale.

Passionate belief doesn't make things true. You can passionate believe in Zeus and it won't be any more real than any other gods from history.

Yup, the only difference between an Atheist and a Christian is the belief in one god out of thousands.
 

GameChanger

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,935
I have said this before and I"ll say it again. If Jesus returned and requested entry into America these fucks would deny him because he would look like a "terrorist". I am absolutely not kidding. They absolutely don't give a shit about Trump's moral values because they themselves don't really have any in the first place. All of Trump's unchristian like conduct doesn't matter as long as he keeps spewing xenophobic, racist and islamophobic bullshit out of his mouth. Let that sink in. It's a fact. His vocal support of LGBT doesn't mean shit because they know that deep down he is anti-LGBT as well.

Also relevant.
 
Oct 28, 2017
2,700
Siloam Springs
No kidding. Guess that explains The non sequitur post that goes off on a completely different subject than what it quoted.

Alright, so I'll answer your question, but I'll at least not insult you while doing it.

It seems to me the poster was saying, and using a broad brush, that religion is the end all be all to all problems. In this situation, they perverse the normalcy of what should happen in government.

Before you go off about that, look to the left, you're avatar, that would let me assume there is a higher probability that you just may be religious? I could be wrong here.

The point I was trying to make was, just because some religious people are bad, don't paint everyone that shade of red.
 

GameChanger

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,935
It's always somewhat ridiculous how people on here (and on GAF before) love to dogpile on how stupid, ignorant, and hateful Christians are. If this amount of ridicule was said about Muslims or Jews, there would rightfully be outrage and mass bannings.

Yes, I know this thread is about evangelicals, but let's not act as if Christians in general (including Catholics and mainline Protestants) don't get mounds of insults every time Christianity is brought up here.
I somewhat agree with the sentiment. Christianity and evangelism needs to be seperated in these discussions. Specially at resetera.
 

Garlador

Banned
Oct 30, 2017
14,131
No true Scotsman the post unfortunately.
Every passage is subject to interpretation by the reader so it's basically a distorting ink blot test for what the trader wants to believe.

You give me those passages, and I'll give you passages that call for murdering atheists and homosexuals and you'll give me your interpretative apologetic response.

Your belief of what Christianity is, is not the correct one. There isn't a correct one because again it's interpretation from largely made up stories and tales.

And no, the Bible isn't filled with evidence. It's filled with claims.
Same with the witnessing of the founders. It's a claim.

If all it takes for you to believe magical stuff is claims, then that proves why people believe Trump. And kim jung un. And islam. And Mormonism. And cult leaders. Etc.
Let me narrow it down then: Christianity, or the followings of what Christ taught.

There are a lot of things Jesus taught and preached over. I'll let you try and find one passage from him talking about homosexuality, or calling to murder atheists, or discussing abortion, or anything that gets you all riled up over Christian doctrine.

Criticize religion, gladly, but it's still ignorant to say that the book itself isn't stuffed full of claims (and we'll call them claims) that demand its believers question the validity of the source, to reject blind faith, or that the signs and evidence of God and His power aren't abundant. Pretty much every other chapter is full of people going "how will they believe what I'm saying?" followed by "this is the sign I'll give to you so they know".

What I mentioned wasn't just "claims" in the context of what was written; it was that a lot of claims are made and that Jesus told his followers most of them were nonsense and never validated. It's the whole point of him warning against false prophets, against anti-Christs (literally, those who embody everything he was against), and about the utter hypocrisy of the religious leaders of his time who used faith and law to oppress minorities and enrich themselves in the name of God, for power and profit.

I get it; you dislike religion. But Jesus didn't condone murdering atheists or homosexuals. There's no passage there about that. His very existence, at least as written, was him spending his years proving he was real through miracles while the nations demanded proof of his authority (and crucified him anyway when it was clear he wasn't there for their benefit). Literally everything he preached over was, well, liberal. The opposite of modern conservative Christian belief. Trump is the very man he preached against in almost every sermon.

If you can find a single passage from him condone a single thing Trump has said or done in his life, I'd be amazed, since he seems as anti-Christian as they come.
 

Boiled Goose

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
9,999
Let me narrow it down then: Christianity, or the followings of what Christ taught.

There are a lot of things Jesus taught and preached over. I'll let you try and find one passage from him talking about homosexuality, or calling to murder atheists, or discussing abortion, or anything that gets you all riled up over Christian doctrine.

Criticize religion, gladly, but it's still ignorant to say that the book itself isn't stuffed full of claims (and we'll call them claims) that demand its believers question the validity of the source, to reject blind faith, or that the signs and evidence of God and His power aren't abundant. Pretty much every other chapter is full of people going "how will they believe what I'm saying?" followed by "this is the sign I'll give to you so they know".

What I mentioned wasn't just "claims" in the context of what was written; it was that a lot of claims are made and that Jesus told his followers most of them were nonsense and never validated. It's the whole point of him warning against false prophets, against anti-Christs (literally, those who embody everything he was against), and about the utter hypocrisy of the religious leaders of his time who used faith and law to oppress minorities and enrich themselves in the name of God, for power and profit.

I get it; you dislike religion. But Jesus didn't condone murdering atheists or homosexuals. There's no passage there about that. His very existence, at least as written, was him spending his years proving he was real through miracles while the nations demanded proof of his authority (and crucified him anyway when it was clear he wasn't there for their benefit). Literally everything he preached over was, well, liberal. The opposite of modern conservative Christian belief. Trump is the very man he preached against in almost every sermon.

If you can find a single passage from him condone a single thing Trump has said or done in his life, I'd be amazed, since he seems as anti-Christian as they come.

As an initial agreement. Yes Trump is pretty far from mainstream US Christian values and practice. He's socially liberalish or indifferent. On the other hand, he pushes conservative judges and white Christian nationalism which is very much naisntmain.

The main message from Christ is about salvation, which is a morally repugnant concept whether it's about works, or worse... Belief.

What did Jesus say about Jewish law? What does Jewish law say? So yeah... I don't consider jesus a particularly moral figure. Our perception of Jesus and new testament god as good is a recent cultural white washing. We think it's normal to follow what is basically a cult based on literal human sacrifice and wear tortute iconography around our necks.
 

PKrockin

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,260
Trump's white evangelical support is apparently less about religion and more about racial resentment and nationalism. It seems much more political and social. This is a group that claims takes that Bible more seriously and literally than other denominations, judging from my time in it, yet supported obviously un-Christlike policies like a Muslim refugee ban by three to one after Trump's election, even while other denominations were split or against. I don't see the use of torture or killing terrorists' innocent families reflecting Christ's values either, they seem very contradictory. Christ didn't preach "law and order" and a wall to keep out "the illegals", he preached generosity to those less fortunate and love for thy neighbor while chastising Pharisees. The things evangelicals like Trump for most are unrelated or contradictory to Christ's teachings. Meanwhile, the one other person in the 17-candidate primary field white evangelicals supported a bit more than Trump was Ted Cruz, who proposed such bigoted ideas like directing police to target neighborhoods with Muslims like they do for neighborhoods with drugs or organized crime. He was a Trump lite while not having as much of the horrible personal life that Trump had.

This is anecdotal, but my white evangelical family made excuses for every single one of these horrible policies and had Trump/Cruz's back the whole way, except for one time--when Trump said he likes taking guns first and doing due process later. Suddenly, once it seemed like something could happen to affect them and not just far-off brown people, they finally expressed concern about his disregard for basic civil rights.
 

4859

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,046
In the weak and the wounded
Alright, so I'll answer your question, but I'll at least not insult you while doing it.

Know what I love about Motorhead, they have like half a dozen songs that go all in on adressing exactly this kind of shit right here.
It seems to me the poster was saying, and using a broad brush, that religion is the end all be all to all problems. In this situation, they perverse the normalcy of what should happen in government.
The poster was saying religion has no place in politics, and then you twisted that shit into garbage about 'accepting my beliefs', as if accepting your beliefs and allowing your beliefs to dictate other people's fucking lives is the same fucking thing.

Which is exactly what your party does. That's what all your hot button issues like abortion is about.

Controlling mother fucking peoples lives.

But that's just accepting yalls Beliefs right?

Because it's not enough that you follow your own beliefs. No, you all have to control everyone else too.

Before you go off about that, look to the left, you're avatar, that would let me assume there is a higher probability that you just may be religious? I could be wrong here.

I could have a picture of a monkeys anus and you 'would be allowed to assume' whatever the hell you want. Just like all the other assumptions you make when you all lack evidence, you are perfectly free to make them.

If however, you expect that assumption to be treated with the same credibility as actually verified facts and evidence, then no, no you dont get credibility for your assumptions. Which is good, because they are usually wrong. Like here, if what you are actually asking, is if my avatar has anything to do with me being religious, no, you missed by a country mile.


The point I was trying to make was, just because some religious people are bad, don't paint everyone that shade of red.

A few good apples don't unrotten the barrel.

There's a reason, throughout history, fucking constantly, the 'good' Christian apples are always outnumbered 20,000 to 189.
 
Last edited:
Jan 10, 2018
6,327
I know a whole bunch of actual bible thumpers, of devout christians.

They are all about help those in need, be welcoming of others, protect the environment, you know lefties.

Than are those who claim one christian nation under god . Its basically just coded language for white supremacy. Hate the other, hate the black, the brown, fuck those in need and what even is environment.

I'm not saying real-christians are the good guys and the fakers are the baddies.
Only saying that are indeed many awesome christians and than there are those who made christianity about hate and whiteness.

White evangelicals have a tendency to the latter, sadly.
 

4859

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,046
In the weak and the wounded
I know a whole bunch of actual bible thumpers, of devout christians.

They are all about help those in need, be welcoming of others, protect the environment, you know lefties.

Than are those who claim one christian nation under god . Its basically just coded language for white supremacy. Hate the other, hate the black, the brown, fuck those in need and what even is environment.

I'm not saying real-christians are the good guys and the fakers are the baddies.
Only saying that are indeed many awesome christians and than there are those who made christianity about hate and whiteness.

White evangelicals have a tendency to the latter, sadly.

Hate your next door neighbor, but don't forget to say grace,
 

Biske

Member
Nov 11, 2017
8,253
It's never been about value or morals, its always been about racism, and sexism and targeting an other. Any immoral dipshit can be their idol as long as they can continue on with the main goal.
 

Chojin

Member
Oct 26, 2017
2,623
It's always somewhat ridiculous how people on here (and on GAF before) love to dogpile on how stupid, ignorant, and hateful Christians are. If this amount of ridicule was said about Muslims or Jews, there would rightfully be outrage and mass bannings.

Yes, I know this thread is about evangelicals, but let's not act as if Christians in general (including Catholics and mainline Protestants) don't get mounds of insults every time Christianity is brought up here.


As a Catholic I think it's fine. Being top dog for at least 1600 years means we've grown a fairly thick skin.

Honestly the persecution complex seems to be ridiculed most and thats rightfully so.

I feel strong enough in my faith to be stung by what some people on the internet have to say about my religion and I've heard far worse albeit laughable statements about Catholicism from fundamentalist evangelical protestants.
 

Deleted member 3058

User requested account closure
Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,728
I disagree that it is a 180. Matthew 4:17 establishes the entire purpose of his ministry, beginning after his fast in the wilderness: "From that time Jesus began to preach, saying, 'Repent, for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.'"

That's literally his first teaching, or "command" if you will--repentance.

Matthew 5 then begins the most famous of his teachings, the Sermon on the Mount.
When did I say Jesus never spoke about repentance?

I'm saying THIS
5fQ9A8K.jpg


Is a 180 from Jesus' message just a few books prior.
 

SturokBGD

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,414
Ontario
Gods! give me the power
to destroy the christian gods
give me the rule over the fire
to burn the houses of god

Give me the power over the wind
to crush the forest of crosses
give me the black sword to kill
all those who swore him the faith

I will desecrate the holy temples
destroy and burn churches and chapels
black smoke of the burning temples
will cover the sky
the fear will offend sons of only god.

Archangels of Darkness, come to the earth
I will show you the way of glory
by the burning churches
you will drink the human blood
and satisfy your dark lust
it is high time to your scream
be heard among the dead

There is no the only god
there is only beast over the beasts
there is no good and Evil
there is only living and dead
and those who will die soon
so I drink the blood from the black cup
in the glare of burning churches
because ancient damned gods
will have the day of revenge
when the sky is covered in smoke
when the rivers are full of bood.
Making your way in the world today
Takes everything you've got
Taking a break from all your worries
sure could help a lot

Wouldn't you like to get away?
Sometimes you wanna go
Where everybody knows your name
and they're always glad you came

You wanna be where you can see
our troubles are all the same
you wanna be where everybody
knows your name
 

ham bone

Alt account
Banned
Apr 12, 2018
732
I know a whole bunch of actual bible thumpers, of devout christians.

They are all about help those in need, be welcoming of others, protect the environment, you know lefties.

Than are those who claim one christian nation under god . Its basically just coded language for white supremacy. Hate the other, hate the black, the brown, fuck those in need and what even is environment.

I'm not saying real-christians are the good guys and the fakers are the baddies.
Only saying that are indeed many awesome christians and than there are those who made christianity about hate and whiteness.

White evangelicals have a tendency to the latter, sadly.



It's especially annoying when people say things like "God, white evangelicals are such racist scum."

"I'm a white evangelical, are you calling me racist scum?

"Uh, if you aren't racist scum why are you upset? I was clearly only talking about white evangelicals who are racist scum, not you."

This line of thought applies to every race, creed, nationality or affiliation. It's the height of passive-aggressiveness. Show some spine. Anyone know the fallacy? A reverse "True Scotsman?"