• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

ManaByte

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
11,087
Southern California
dayum

Best I've got over here is the after-mentioned LieMAX (which curiously switched back to non-reserved seating recently) as well as a few Cinemark XD screens.

Did I mention that you don't pay for popcorn there either? They sell a popcorn pass at the start of the year for $30. Gives you a free medium popcorn every time you go.
 

Cross-Section

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,874
Did I mention that you don't pay for popcorn there either? They sell a popcorn pass at the start of the year for $30. Gives you a free medium popcorn every time you go.

wyKo9sc.gif


Lando gif keeps it on topic
 

Auros01

Avenger
Nov 17, 2017
5,512
It's Star Wars.



All three times are in this theater:
21762795_10154866413816301_8720600959166490911_o.jpg


Laser projected 84' screen in Atmos.

Never thought I'd see a Harkins theater mentioned on Era. The Cine 1 is pretty great - I've seen both Black Panther and Infinity War in Cine 1 - exceptional experiences, the both of them.

Anyways, I'll be seeing Solo on Friday (unfortunately, it will be at my friend's preferred theater - a local AMC... ugh) and then again on Sunday at a Harkins theater (but not Cine 1). Really looking forward to this movie!
 

Deleted member 5666

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,753
I only have my tickets preordered for Thuraday but I will have at least 2 viewings in opening weekend.

I mean its Star Wars. Multiple viewings is how I have always rolled since the 97 SE re-releases.
 

Kvik

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
889
Downunder.
The screening times on IMAX 2D in my city is an absolute rubbish.

Two sessions only this week: one on opening night, and one on Sunday the 27th. The rest are for 3D sessions which I have no interest in booking.

Decided to watch it on my local cinema instead, if I like it I'll probably do a second viewing the following week.
 

The Driver

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
1,581
Guess I'll post my reactions here.

It was...serviceable? Idk. Movie is def not making any top 3 SW lists but it's not like it was outright bad. Workmanlike is how I would describe it or maybe just there.

I think besides it being whatever as a movie the thing that stuck out to me the most is this is the script and movie that was so holy that Lucasfilm felt the need to kick two great directors off of it for?

A movie where
everything you basically expect to happen in a Han Solo prequel, happens in the most obvious way possible, where the name Solo came from, the dice, Kessel run, sabbac game, meeting chewie, etc.
It's all so ho-hum. It's very much in the same vein as Rogue One in that in contains little in the way of surprises and is basically what you get if you gave the most unimaginative fanboy $250 million to make a Solo prequel which is crazy because this dude helped write ESB.

It definitely felt like this needed a director(s) to elevate the material. Someone or something to bring some spark to the moment to moment stuff because the plot just. Ain't. It. It's a shame to because Alden is actually pretty good (tbh tho I'm not weirdly attached to Ford) as Solo and the rest of the cast is also doing work, even Clark!

It's also putting me in the twilight zone that Disney is clearly feeling bullish on this enough
to put so much sequel bait in here. Like are you fucking seriously trying to make a prequel series for Han Solo happen Disney? The pirate gang leader with the (literal) face turn and turning out to be anti-empire, the "big job" waiting on Tatooine, Qi'ra working with FUCKING DARTH MAUL. He even lights his saber for like...no goddamn reason but to woo the audience!
It's like Disney going full Marvel with SW in how much fan service and leaving doors open they did here.

I really don't get it. Movie is good looking, cast still litty, the score is surprisingly ok, and it's cool that the movie contains zero to minimal force/empire related stuff, but man what the fuckkkkkkkk. I would kill to see what Lord and Miller would have done with this quagmire of a movie.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
MMarston

MMarston

Self-requested ban
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,605
Looks like we know which thing George Lucas backseat/micro-directed

(Spoiler alert: It is incredibly insignificant, if that's what you're wondering lol)

When George Lucas makes a suggestion about Han Solo, you listen. That was Ron Howard's thought, at least, during the production of Solo: A Star Wars Story. Lucas, who created not just the character Han Solo but the franchise itself, was visiting the set one day and offered up a suggestion on how to change the scene. It's not a spoiler, if you're concerned about that.

There's a scene on the Millennium Falcon between Han (Alden Ehrenreich) and Qi'ra (Emilia Clarke) that takes place in Lando's cape room. In the middle of the conversation, Han hangs up a cape that was off the rack. But Lucas didn't like that.

"He said, 'You know, Han wouldn't bother to hang it up,'" Howard told Variety. So Howard made that change.

"Not only was it a nice accent on the scene, but it was also a reminder that George created this character and really understood him," Howard continued. "He was so reluctant [to offer his opinion], and yet the choice was so right that it was fun to use it."
 

sinny

Member
Oct 28, 2017
1,421
I really liked the movie, after TLJ i was going to stop watching SW, i acepted i wasn't the target, but this one was made for the "old?" fans. It felt like a spin-off / comic of the star wars we know.
Best Disney Star Wars movie. I expected the worst (as all my friends) but we left the theater so hyped, we can't wait for a sequel.
 

Auros01

Avenger
Nov 17, 2017
5,512
I really liked the movie, after TLJ i was going to stop watching SW, i acepted i wasn't the target, but this one was made for the "old?" fans. It felt like a spin-off / comic of the star wars we know.
Best Disney Star Wars movie. I expected the worst (as all my friends) but we left the theater so hyped, we can't wait for a sequel.

Interesting take. It'll be interesting to see if more people have the same reaction you do after the divisiveness of TLJ.
 

Sargerus

▲ Legend ▲
The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
20,864
For some reason i thought this was only releasing next week. Need to grab my seats for Thursday.
 

Visanideth

Banned
Oct 31, 2017
4,771
While Marvel fatigue seems to be a myth, Star Wars fatigue may kick in for real. You can't mass produce these, people. They need to be events.
 

Blackpuppy

Member
Oct 28, 2017
4,207
Great OP!

Could we also try to have a Star Wars thread without any TLJ fights pleeeeeaaaaasssseeee?!
 

H2intensity

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 27, 2017
921
Just saw it.. I like it. Its fun and really had that OT vibe just like Rogue One. But its not as epic as RO. Great take on Star Wars universe. This Star Wars Stories already better than the new trilogy.
 

ZeoVGM

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
76,219
Providence, RI
While Marvel fatigue seems to be a myth, Star Wars fatigue may kick in for real. You can't mass produce these, people. They need to be events.

The "fatigue" idea is silly. Disney doesn't expect a Han Solo prequel film to make the kind of money that a Skywalker saga film would.

Just like when Ant-Man doesn't touch Black Panther or Infinity War numbers, no one (intelligent) is going to be talking about "fatigue." Expectations are different.
 

SELIG

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
2,011
I'm so ready. Listened to a podcast spoiler free review - MTR Network - SOLO: A STAR WARS STORY REVIEW – A GREAT ADDITION TO THE STAR WARS UNIVERSE and the two guys talking about it really liked it.

I wanted this movie when it was directed by Lord & Miller, and the awesome cast they chose and the awesome Director of Photography, Bradford Young that they chose.
I still wanted this movie when Kathleen Kennedy decided to fire L&M because I trust her decisions and leadership of Lucasfilm. I wanted this movie when Ron Howard was selected to finish it because his good spirits and excitement displayed on his Twitter production posts were infectious. I'm ready for something fun here.
 

MagicHobo

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,602
While Marvel fatigue seems to be a myth, Star Wars fatigue may kick in for real. You can't mass produce these, people. They need to be events.
Come on, Iron Man was dope, but after they followed that up with Hulk, Iron Man 2, and Thor (potentially The First Avenger depending on your taste) you can't possibly tell me you weren't thinking "fuuuuuck this is getting exhausting".
 

ZeoVGM

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
76,219
Providence, RI
Come on, Iron Man was dope, but after they followed that up with Hulk, Iron Man 2, and Thor (potentially The First Avenger depending on your taste) you can't possibly tell me you weren't thinking "fuuuuuck this is getting exhausting".

Not sure why anyone would think that? The idea of "Marvel fatigue" is that there were too many films, too quickly, not that they maybe didn't like one of them. That's 5 movies in four years.
 
Oct 25, 2017
16,738
It's a movie and ti should be treated as such. treating it like an event is weird to me. Sorry. Most people don't want to wait decades to see what's new for Star Wars.

It's been clear from day one this movie isn't going to make as much as the Saga films. In fact it'll make less most likely, but still make a respectable amount of money while continuing to do it's job. keeping the fandom engaged and offering more material for other media, such as books, comics, toys etc.
 

gilko79

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,214
Ivalice
Great OT. Hyped for this, as I am with all Star Wars content. My son turns 6 this weekend, so this will be the first time I take him to see a Star Wars film on opening night. I think he's just as excited as I am.
 

MagicHobo

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,602
Not sure why anyone would think that? The idea of "Marvel fatigue" is that there were too many films, too quickly, not that they maybe didn't like one of them. That's 5 movies in four years.
I don't think the idea of "Marvel fatigue" is purely a matter of quality vs quantity, but perhaps more a matter of conservatism with respect to creativity. The initial batch of Marvel films, despite the scope and novelty of the fledgling shared universe, were pretty standard ass comic book films and the worry about fatigue were, yes, due to frequency but also the formulaic nature of it all. But they also established the universe and provided a base to build upon. Marvel has managed to avoid fatigue (for the most part) and flourish by exploring genres and more recently pursuing distinct creative voices (James Gunn, Ryan Coogler, Taika Waititi, even guys like Petyon Reed count). There are still formulaic elements, but enough variety to keep it interesting.

You can compare this idea to Star Wars, with this initial batch hewing closely to the aesthetic and principles of the OT. They tried to use the modern Marvel model of scooping up strong, young, creative voices out of the gate, but that has largely crumbled with the exception of Rian Johnson. I think once they've found their footing and better oiled the machine they'll be able to follow that path once more. For now we've got 3 more conservative takes on Star Wars (TFA, RO, and Solo), but I think TLJ represents a strong creative step forward.

The fact that Johnson is getting his own trilogy as, presumably, the next major step in Star Wars post sequel trilogy is a pretty promising way forward. Benioff and Weiss are perhaps less promising, but maybe they've got it in them (and they have occasionally displayed a pretty strong creative voice, despite working in somebody else's universe).
 
Oct 26, 2017
5,435
Guess I'll post my reactions here.

It was...serviceable? Idk. Movie is def not making any top 3 SW lists but it's not like it was outright bad. Workmanlike is how I would describe it or maybe just there.

I think besides it being whatever as a movie the thing that stuck out to me the most is this is the script and movie that was so holy that Lucasfilm felt the need to kick two great directors off of it for?

A movie where
everything you basically expect to happen in a Han Solo prequel, happens in the most obvious way possible, where the name Solo came from, the dice, Kessel run, sabbac game, meeting chewie, etc.
It's all so ho-hum. It's very much in the same vein as Rogue One in that in contains little in the way of surprises and is basically what you get if you gave the most unimaginative fanboy $250 million to make a Solo prequel which is crazy because this dude helped write ESB.

It definitely felt like this needed a director(s) to elevate the material. Someone or something to bring some spark to the moment to moment stuff because the plot just. Ain't. It. It's a shame to because Alden is actually pretty good (tbh tho I'm not weirdly attached to Ford) as Solo and the rest of the cast is also doing work, even Clark!

It's also putting me in the twilight zone that Disney is clearly feeling bullish on this enough
to put so much sequel bait in here. Like are you fucking seriously trying to make a prequel series for Han Solo happen Disney? The pirate gang leader with the (literal) face turn and turning out to be anti-empire, the "big job" waiting on Tatooine, Qi'ra working with FUCKING DARTH MAUL. He even lights his saber for like...no goddamn reason but to woo the audience!
It's like Disney going full Marvel with SW in how much fan service and leaving doors open they did here.

I really don't get it. Movie is good looking, cast still litty, the score is surprisingly ok, and it's cool that the movie contains zero to minimal force/empire related stuff, but man what the fuckkkkkkkk. I would kill to see what Lord and Miller would have done with this quagmire of a movie.

Thanks for sharing this. As someone who hates spoilers and who isn't excited walking into this movie, I still went ahead and read yours and am glad I am. Better to wrap my head around the spoiler's inclusion now than have it possibly distract me from the showing.
 

Jiggy

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,291
wherever
The "fatigue" idea is silly. Disney doesn't expect a Han Solo prequel film to make the kind of money that a Skywalker saga film would.

Just like when Ant-Man doesn't touch Black Panther or Infinity War numbers, no one (intelligent) is going to be talking about "fatigue." Expectations are different.

Ant-Man didn't have a budget over $250m
 

TheGhost

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
28,137
Long Island
I really liked the movie, after TLJ i was going to stop watching SW, i acepted i wasn't the target, but this one was made for the "old?" fans. It felt like a spin-off / comic of the star wars we know.
Best Disney Star Wars movie. I expected the worst (as all my friends) but we left the theater so hyped, we can't wait for a sequel.
What I like to hear, seeing it tonight
Felt the same way after TLJ
 

Tetra-Grammaton-Cleric

user requested ban
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
8,958
I'm looking forward to something that's a bit more light to be honest.

I loved TLJ but it was emotionally taxing, especially losing Luke at the end. :(
 

Vagger

Member
Oct 29, 2017
72
I saw it today. Here are some spoiler-free thoughts for you guys.

It's a good movie. Maybe even very good. Right now a solid 8/10 for me, but it might drop. The problems with the directing of the movie are somewhat recognisable, but they do'nt hinder the overall feeling of the movie. The words in my mind, when the end credits started rolling were: Entertaining, nice and fun. It's no OT levels of good, not even ST, but for the second "star wars story", a working movie. Went with low exceptations because of the reviews and stuff, and came out pleasantly surprised. Coming from this movie, I have no problems with future spin-offs, I welcome them gladly.

Pros:

+The cast. Alden doesn't do a Ford impression, but his own thing, and that is good. the performance isn't that great, but I still believed he was a younger Han Solo. Especially towards the end. Emilia Clarke did a great job, and Joonas Suotamo brought many new, great things for Chewbacca. I especially loved the way they intruduced Chewie. Woody Harrelson I actually liked, despite the critics saying that he was forgettable. He felt like a character with a real history. Glover was great and made for Lando, but I would have liked to have seen more of him. Also Paul Bettany was marvellous, I swear that man can play anyone. For a spin-off, the characters felt very nice and I liked them a lot more than Jyn, Cassian and their crew in Rogue One. Tha cast also seemed to have great chemistry outside the film shoot, and they didn't have a problem with the director change. The characters arent ST tier , but still likable.
+Music. John Powell brought nice new themes on the table, some with a style never used in star wars movies before. John WIlliams' new Han Solo theme was also very solid. Was pleasantly surprised.
+Locales. The new planets we see have peoples and and styles that feel fresh and great. Can always appreciate that, when although i like the ST; it feels a bit too familiar.
+Plot. While I know everyone will not agree with me on this, I felt the plot, which didn't involve the same rebels VS empire crap, was fresh and handled pretty well. It also had some nice surprises and twists I was not excpecting. The plot and story themes bridged the PT and the OT with some things, but overall, it had a plot you could watch without seeing so much of the other movies. I felt this was not the case with Rogue One.
+The best close combat action sequences in any SW movie.
+the jokes landed way more than in TLJ, and although they were sometimes a bit cringe-worthy, they felt a bit more closer to the OT.

Cons:

-The familiar characters problem. Whenever Lando, Chewie, Solo or the Falcon were in danger, it felt a bit boring. We know these characters will survive, so why show them in danger?
-Fan service. It wasn't a huge problem for me, but the movie suffers from it. Trust me: you KNOW when something important or a callback related to the OT happens. The movie will make sure of it with musical notes, zoom ins etc, it was pretty meh.
-At some points, it felt like the Kasdans had a great plot, which was propably a bit too condeluted and got buried under all the production problems.
-Overall, the movie did not do much for the character for Han, heck it did more to chewie. Aldens han is the tilte character, but was pushed a bit to the side. So that begs the question: why make this movie at all? Sure it was fun and I liked it, butat least do the character justice.
-Some of the side charaters felt a bit boring and unecessary.

Overall a fun summer star wars movie. It's not great but it is a very good heist/criminal sci-fi movie. Less dependant on the originals than rogue one, and maybe in that way a bit better (even though i like rogue one a lot). If you go with the excpectations that the film is what it is, you can find a lot of enjoyment out of it. If you like the post 2015 star wars movies, you should see this in theatres. (also sorry for any mistakes, not used to writing long texts in english)
 

Nerdyone

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
1,723
My local theater outside of Chicago is not filling up nearly as quickly as it did for any of the past SW a and MCU films. I think this could be a flop
 

Auros01

Avenger
Nov 17, 2017
5,512
Thanks for the detailed impressions, Vagger . This movie sounds like it's right up my ally. I've got modest expectations and am just looking for a good heist flick.
 
Oct 28, 2017
13,691
Nice job on the impressions, Vagger. Sounds like you enjoyed it well enough but it was nothing special.

Disappointing to hear that Han doesn't get much fleshing out. Have heard that observation from a few reviewers now.
 
Oct 26, 2017
5,435
Nice well-laid out thoughts Vagger . Thanks

Question : does Alden embody someone who conveys a scoundrel or maverick type character? When i think of such a character type, naturally we think of the OG Solo, a Madmartigan (Val Kilmer), Jack Colton, Jack Sparrow, etc.
 

Vagger

Member
Oct 29, 2017
72
Nice well-laid out thoughts Vagger . Thanks

Question : does Alden embody someone who conveys a scoundrel or maverick type character? When i think of such a character type, naturally we think of the OG Solo, a Madmartigan (Val Kilmer), Jack Colton, Jack Sparrow, etc.

Alden's Han feels a lot less scroundrel than Ford's. But he still does stuff that feels like the OG Han Solo, but maybe in a more naive way, which actually fits the younger character. But then at some points he feels more like the traditional hero, because he is the main character of this movie. It's hard to explain. So my answer would be yes, but not to the same extent as somebody as Jack Sparrow.
 
Oct 26, 2017
5,435
Alden's Han feels a lot less scroundrel than Ford's. But he still does stuff that feels like the OG Han Solo, but maybe in a more naive way, which actually fits the younger character. But then at some points he feels more like the traditional hero, because he is the main character of this movie. It's hard to explain. So my answer would be yes, but not to the same extent as somebody as Jack Sparrow.

Thanks, man