So MegaMan Legacy Collection 1 is the one to get, right? If I was only getting one.
Yea it definitely is, has Mega Man 1-6 so it has the classics :D
So MegaMan Legacy Collection 1 is the one to get, right? If I was only getting one.
Brad loves broken games. Remember him saying Bethesda literally can never make a game that isn't broken because they are so ambitionsI get supremely annoyed when broken games get called ambitious. There are many resource management games that are way more complex than SoD2 that aren't broken.
i did no shave november this year and somebody asked me at the end of it if I had forgotten to shave that morning.
That's how bad I have it.
I was thinking exactly that this morning. Especially Patrick during parts of the Black Ops chat. I genuinely thought it was sped up he was talking so fast.Is it just me or does it sound like the crew are talking at 1.5 speed? It is driving me nuts. I have to keep checking to make sure i didnt speed up the podcast.
Rad. I don't think I've ever beaten one of the mainline MM games. I was always a Zero/Battle Network/Legends guy.Yea it definitely is, has Mega Man 1-6 so it has the classics :D
Was days gone that bad at e3 last year?
Not to say it looks good when it's been shown but it looked fine from what I remember
I'd take having a baby face over this classic male pattern balding look I have going. At this point I just buzz it down and grow out a beard. I guess I'm lucky enough to be able to do that.
I was thinking exactly that this morning. Especially Patrick during parts of the Black Ops chat. I genuinely thought it was sped up he was talking so fast.
Man, shave that head and get some red paint and that's Kratos.
other people have covered it but is like... the most boring game, conceptually, it is something you can point at and go "that is a video game" but nothing about it seems actually interesting; there is the fact that there are hordes of zombies, which... sure, but without anything interesting there you might as well be showing off a tech demo
if it has an interesting story and world, somehow, maybe there'll be something to it? but they sure haven't shown any of that off so far and it seems like the most generic zombie setting, so what's even the appeal beyond "there are many of the least interesting kind of enemy ever to fight"
...also they fucking called the zombies "Freakers", I keep forgetting that and remembering it and getting bewildered by it, as happened yet again right before I started this sentence, they called the zombies "Freakers" and expect people to take the game seriously
the extent of the world building they've shown off is that people looked at other humans becoming infected with something that makes them tear other humans apart and running in hordes to do so, and went "ah, Freakers, cause they're freaking out!", and everyone accepted this
what a game
As a new IP the game is still review dependent. The Podcast discussion was a bit frustrating. I personally don't like the game but on the podcast the argument didn't go beyond "It demoed poorly", "It's not good" and something about dumpsters. I want to know why it's not good, especially when you can compare it to SoD to make your point.What I love about Days Gone is that it shows how deep we are in our own little bubble and don't even realise it. To most of us Days Gone looks generic and not that interesting. But looking at those YouTube views is like holy cow. If played right this could appeal to the gigantic Walking Dead crowd like TLOU2 never could (or would want to I assume).
What I love about Days Gone is that it shows how deep we are in our own little bubble and don't even realise it. To most of us Days Gone looks generic and not that interesting. But looking at those YouTube views is like holy cow. If played right this could appeal to the gigantic Walking Dead crowd like TLOU2 never could (or would want to I assume).
Popularity doesn't automatically make a thing good. Take a look at the Walking Dead as a prime example of that.What I love about Days Gone is that it shows how deep we are in our own little bubble and don't even realise it. To most of us Days Gone looks generic and not that interesting. But looking at those YouTube views is like holy cow. If played right this could appeal to the gigantic Walking Dead crowd like TLOU2 never could (or would want to I assume).
Popularity doesn't automatically make a thing good. Take a look at the Walking Dead as a prime example of that.
I'm not getting that bar Jeff was talking about regarding the new EU stuff.
Jeff seems really angry about it. :D
I myself love it.
lmao they call them freakers? really? l-m-a-o please god they need to change that lmaobut writing off a game because zombies are called Freakers is lame.
Oh I totally recognise that zombies are popular.
Doesn't mean I have to like them.
Popularity doesn't automatically make a thing good. Take a look at the Walking Dead as a prime example of that.
lmao they call them freakers? really? l-m-a-o please god they need to change that lmao
Finding unique (read: stupid) names for zombies is one of my favorite symptoms of the over-saturation of zombie media.lmao they call them freakers? really? l-m-a-o please god they need to change that lmao
they gunna freak it too?lmao they call them freakers? really? l-m-a-o please god they need to change that lmao
Yeah it's amazing how a game like The Last of Us overcame calling its zombies 'clickers' and 'runners' and 'bloaters', amazing.
People want to hate on the game, hard, because compared to other Sony first party games, it doesn't have the same level of polish. It is what it is.
The game is going for something different, the ability to use strategy and herd zombies and pit them against humans, etc. Whether you're interested in that is your own thing, but writing off a game because zombies are called Freakers is lame.
Yes, just call them zombies! It annoys when zombie fiction pretends the concept of zombies didn't exist in their universe.I wish more zombie fiction would just call them zombies. We all get it anyway.
I understand that they would then feel obligated to have other zombie fiction exist within that universe, but they could just not.
They click, though. And that's only one of four stages. You don't need to be so slow and silent around runners and stalkers.
That was a smart way of adapting a real world fungi.Edit: Except TLoU. I love the life cycle of the cordyceps infection.
At the very least that's the sound they make. What in the flying fuck is a freaker? An auto-correct hacker?
Now if they were called Phreakers...sign me up.That was a smart way of adapting a real world fungi.
At the very least that's the sound they make. What in the flying fuck is a freaker? An auto-correct hacker?
kideo games may not be the place to look for well written zambies
To be clear, it's totally a minor point, and more of a laughable thing than a thing I think is outright bad or something anyway- my thoughts on the game are more that it's completely uninteresting. But it also speaks to the thing that would interest me - story and an interesting world - apparently not being thought about at all?
Calling zombies "clickers", "runners", "bloaters", etc. is silly, I agree. But... those zombies also do actually click, run fast, are bloated, etc. You can point to L4D similarly- the special infected have kinda silly names, but the basic name in both cases is "the infected". You can reasonably imagine people looking at these weird mutations and coming up with slang for them.
Meanwhile "Freakers" are... "freaking out", I guess? While somehow not just being "freaks"? It feels like inventing a term to have a term vs thinking through what people in the world would actually say, if that makes sense? It's not like that's what broke my suspension of disbelief, in a game about zombies, it's more that it feels like another sign that the game is just "isn't it cool to fight zombies" vs doing anything interesting with the idea of people who are fighting zombies.
And I'm not hating on it to hate on it. I would legitimately like to understand what people see in it. Is the horde stuff actually interesting to you long term if that's literally all there is to it?
Fiction outside of games isn't any better. I can name a single exception to it in the recent memory.kideo games may not be the place to look for well written zambies
Zombie hackers that make dial-up noises constantly. That's the future I want to live in.
other people have covered it but is like... the most boring game, conceptually, it is something you can point at and go "that is a video game" but nothing about it seems actually interesting; there is the fact that there are hordes of zombies, which... sure, but without anything interesting there you might as well be showing off a tech demo
if it has an interesting story and world, somehow, maybe there'll be something to it? but they sure haven't shown any of that off so far and it seems like the most generic zombie setting, so what's even the appeal beyond "there are many of the least interesting kind of enemy ever to fight"
...also they fucking called the zombies "Freakers", I keep forgetting that and remembering it and getting bewildered by it, as happened yet again right before I started this sentence, they called the zombies "Freakers" and expect people to take the game seriously
the extent of the world building they've shown off is that people looked at other humans becoming infected with something that makes them tear other humans apart and running in hordes to do so, and went "ah, Freakers, cause they're freaking out!", and everyone accepted this
what a game
Rad. I don't think I've ever beaten one of the mainline MM games. I was always a Zero/Battle Network/Legends guy.
I'm sooo curious to see what that busted-ass GDPR compliance stuff that Jeff was talking about is going to look like.
In a weird book shape that is odd to hold and you can only read it on a flat surface.