What the hell are you talking about? I'm not saying anything about what you said. I'm talking about companies and their funding on the media for decades since and before the incorporation of the production committee model in anime and you're talking about sexualization when I never mentioned anything about it in any of my posts.
And wow, how to miss a point and reduct an entire post. I don't see this happening that often.
You're the one who don't know anything about how it works and it clearly shows in what you just posted. The committee companies are the ones who fund, get the money because they have the rights and yes, if it's a failure, they're the one who get the hit. hell, the committee exists for that very reason that if it's a failure, those companies wouldn't lose more money than what they would do if they invested in it alone. The studios don't get it because for the most part they're not funding it and part of the committee and just get the budget of the anime as a payment to them so if it's a success or not, it doesn't matter for them (of course, if they're on the committee, that's another story)
Like I said before, read about what it is because for now you don't have any idea what you're talking about
https://blog.sakugabooru.com/2017/05/02/what-is-an-animes-production-committee/
And I don't know where I said that I agree with the work conditions of animators. I said in my past post that I agree that this needs to get better but this is on the studio management, not on companies that fund anime and don't have anything to do with other companies. Except in cases where theyre owned by other companies like Bandai Namco with Sunrise/Actas/Bandai Namco Pictures or Sega with Marza/TMS Entertainment.