This is completely pointless and stupid. It may end up terrible to even great, but to have literally zero connection to the first season is asinine. Of course the plot would be different, but another Simmons story? Nope. Same showrunners? Nope. Same actors? Nope. Writers? Nope. So basically a new show with the same title.
Yes. Like Feud, American Crime Story. It was always an anthology series so I am not sure about the outrage.
Both of those are Ryan Murphy shows though. Don't they at least share some showrunners? Maybe you're right, but I at least viewed those as coming from Murphy at their source, not new people every year.
Two out of ten aired technically, though it was very long. But yeah I'm going to give it more time for sure.
Ugh, do we really need more reminders that the show comes from the guy who created House?
You got me. It just FEELS different. I guess because ACS starts from a place of a generic anthology title and The Terror is a specific Simmons novel, which they are turning into a generic catch all. I hope its good anyway. I guess they're defining it as historical horror, which is still interesting I suppose.
The second season of ACS was headed by Tom Rob Smith instead of Scott Alexander and Larry Karaszewski and all of the creative staff was new (even if Ryan Murphy still oversaw the show for both seasons), there will likely be at least some overlap in terms of producers for The Terror as well. Murphy played a fairly small role (comparatively) on ACS, he's not listed as a creator or writer for any of the seasons.
Yeah, I just looked up the Feud 2, and it doesn't look like its even happening any time soon, if ever, due to Ryan having one billion other shows coming out.
Lots of things killed Seeso, so NBC weren't that dumb to take the deal. But yeah, a bunch of companies approaches to OTT have left a lot to be desired which is why Netflix is in its dominant position. It will be interesting to see how much Apple and Amazon will be able to move the needle by throwing a ton of money around since they seem to be the most inclined to go against Netflix's top dog position.
This is fine. I think it's clear they had couldn't really run a season so a Sense8 style finale is probably for the best.
What features does netflix even have that arent just cheap gimmicks.
I always find it odd when people say they hate monopolies when in fact they love them because they're too lazy to manage more than one source for anything. lol
Damn. Even though it didn't seem to be popular or perform well, I enjoyed the show a lot. I'll miss it
I mean, it's been renewed through 2020, so maybe its a soft reboot.
It's literally the Maron final season arc. He loses everything, goes into a drug induced spiral, and then goes through rehab and finds a new life... back with Amanda Peet's character. All of this was in the finale episode. lol
It doesn't even deserve a movie, they barely got a second season and the dumbass showrunners end it on a cliffhanger? Screw them.
It makes me unreasonably angry everytime it happens, of course there are surprise cancellations but when you're a bubble show you really shouldn't end on a cliffhanger. It's even worse for show's like Timeless that were already saved once, they already achieved the almost impossible and they're still pulling that shit?
Unless you consider listening to heartbroken fans whine enjoyable like some people do, then it's all according to keikaku.
Yeah that's why I was wondering if the show was cancelled. lol
Paramount is airing commercials highlighting they have syndication rights to Mom, and Two and a half men. They rebranded for that?
There's "this season is a self-contained story arc that has a beginning, middle, and end; here's a tease of next season", and "here's a goddamn cliffhanger". Timeless decided on the latter.
