the biggest problem I seem to have with app switching is with a keyboard present.. which is incredibly troublesome in apps where you can't dismiss the keyboard. or where it is more than one or two gestures to dismiss the keyboard. outside of that I love the app switcher.. just wish they would fix it on apps with keyboards.It's a good gesture, but the inconsistency of the spatial model means that you can't create a mental map of where things are. If you swipe left, you get the last app used. Now if you swipe right, you'll go back to the first app. However if you wait a few seconds before changing back, swiping right won't do anything -- the first app is on the left side now. They need to just make it consistent like the macOS app switcher.
sorry, wasn't quite clear. There was no training through failures. Face ID takes something 50% wrong, and through enough passcode unlocks will eventually train it close enough. Touch ID was way more strict than that. The vast majority of your print needed to be correct. You didn't "correct" Touch ID, you added to the information on your print. For Face ID.. because of glasses, scarves, hats, etc.. The system has to be able to train even though a huge portion of the visual information is "false".TouchID definitely had training, it was just less obvious than even FaceID. If you went into the TouchID menu and laid your finger on the sensor, one of the entries would turn grey. When it does that, it's recognizing the finger and capturing new info. I was able to train it so it knew my entire index finger, not just the center I started with. You basically lifted up and down slowly moving further from the center, so it used the map it already had to know which part of the print it was recognizing and then map the new stuff as well
definitely read the whole thing... (on the 10 year old kid). There are a LOT of things at play here. All of this stuff will be forgotten in a month. Specifically for this story:
In the original conversation with the mom, his face had been admittedly trained on the X
When she registered her face in good lighting, they couldn't get his face to unlock
when they went back and used poor lighting to register, he could again train (after three times) to unlock. presumably (as mentioned in the article) the poor lighting conditions combined with his undeveloped (re young) facial features and direct relation contributed to it.
what we are seeing in all of these reports I think is apple kind of caught between a rock and a hard place, and I "think" they chose the right path.
basically make the enrollment, training and recognition so strict that you will get more failures but it will be xx% more secure, or make the training more lax so you will get fewer failures, but it will also be possible to, intentionally or unintentionally, train an immediate relation's similar face to unlock.
I say I "think" they made the right call because for 99.99999% of the population this will be way more than "good enough". every example we've seen of it being bypassed are from immediate relations after multiple failures to train the recognition. and despite the severely questionable nature of the only "hack" reported, even if it did turn out to be real (questionable) the answer is then to simply not use Face ID for such sensitive or high profile users. the same as such cases aren't safe with Touch ID either.
edit - I think one major point passed over in all of this from the media.. is that in all cases (correct me if I'm wrong), these are all immediate relations that are bypassing Face ID. Also in virtually all cases (again, correct me if I'm wrong), training was used as the first number of attempts failed.
sorry, wasn't quite clear. There was no training through failures. Face ID takes something 50% wrong, and through enough passcode unlocks will eventually train it close enough. Touch ID was way more strict than that. The vast majority of your print needed to be correct. You didn't "correct" Touch ID, you added to the information on your print. For Face ID.. because of glasses, scarves, hats, etc.. The system has to be able to train even though a huge portion of the visual information is "false".
that's what I meant by training. You "Fine tuned" Touch ID. You literally train Face ID with data that would otherwise be considered false/negative.
They probably should make training more visible than it is now. For example they could give an option in the settings to train it further. The problem right now seems to be that people are accidentally training wrong faces by entering their passcode without knowing that it does that.
nah... IMHO it's fine how it is now. The phone isn't even two weeks. This hubbub will die down and like I said earlier.. for 99.99999999999% (etc) of the population this will be fast, accurate and secure. Every video reported are immediate relations after training. if you can't trust your siblings/kids, who can you trust? The only real security concern is the same security concern for Touch ID. i.e. people of significant importance.. who probably shouldn't be using biometrics anyway.They probably should make training more visible than it is now. For example they could give an option in the settings to train it further. The problem right now seems to be that people are accidentally training wrong faces by entering their passcode without knowing that it does that.
It doesn't train every time it fails and you enter the code, it has to hit a minimum level of recognition, but not enough to unlock the phone. A total stranger can enter in the passcode as many times they want, as long as their face isn't close to yours no data is going to be entered into the training
it's not training "wrong" faces. it's training "very similar' faces that are direct genetic relations. HUGE difference. As mentioned a couple of posts ago, WRONG faces won't train no matter how many times you enter a passcode.I know but that doesn't change anything. It's training wrong faces and they could prevent that by letting the user have some kind of input on it.
No. If it's not your face it's the wrong face. Whether it's similar to yours or not is irrelevant.it's not training "wrong" faces. it's training "very similar' faces that are direct genetic relations. HUGE difference. As mentioned a couple of posts ago, WRONG faces won't train no matter how many times you enter a passcode.
I never noticed Touch ID becoming more reliable over time, either on the 6s or the 7. It was always the same barely passable 50-60% on my fingerprints. Face ID just after a few days has been noticeably faster, more consistent, and was unlocking from angles and distances it couldn't before.
I feel like that some people didn't do the initial "finger training" well enough or something because my mother always has issues with her finger and TouchID, but for me it was more reliable than FaceID at this point. Almost never had a misfire.
Does anyone feel wrong about the phone being naked? I took it out of the case and it feels that way. With a case it feels complete: flush camera, soft grip, protected, stress-free replaceable outer shell. Despite the quality materials, these phones feel designed to be in a case, Apple provides the inner skeleton and you finish it up with the skin you wish.
And I've used most of my iPhones naked, most of the time. Including my previous 6s+ (which already felt a bit that way, but I couldn't take the extra width a case gives to it).
Does anyone feel wrong about the phone being naked? I took it out of the case and it feels that way. With a case it feels complete: flush camera, soft grip, protected, stress-free replaceable outer shell. Despite the quality materials, these phones feel designed to be in a case, Apple provides the inner skeleton and you finish it up with the skin you wish.
And I've used most of my iPhones naked, most of the time. Including my previous 6s+ (which already felt a bit that way, but I couldn't take the extra width a case gives to it).
Ngo Tuan Anh, Bkav's vice president, gave Reuters several demonstrations, first unlocking the phone with his face and then by using the mask. It appeared to work each time.
However, he declined to register a user ID and the mask on the phone from scratch because, he said, the iPhone and mask need to be placed at very specific angles, and the mask to be refined, a process he said could take up to nine hours.
I definitely prefer the silicone over the leather. It feels way better in the hand and the red one I have from my 6 hasn't aged at all.Returning my Cosmos Blue case tonight for either Black or Saddle Brown....the blue starting looking black on the edges fairly quickly and I`d rather get a leather that I know ages well or one that doesn't age at all - anybody prefer the silicone cases?
If you don't like the wear, I would recommend the silicone. All of the leather will change color, scratch, mark, etc. Some may say this gives it character but if it were the phone that was scratched, they likely wouldn't say it adds character to the phone haha. ;)Returning my Cosmos Blue case tonight for either Black or Saddle Brown....the blue starting looking black on the edges fairly quickly and I`d rather get a leather that I know ages well - anybody prefer the silicone cases?
Unlike my 6s which I was happy to cover up, this feels wrong to keep wrapped up.
So the method those Vietnamese researches from a few days ago used wasn't as simple as they made it seem after all:
Getting your name into the news seems to be one.
I've read when you plug in the phone and hear the charging tone twice in a row, that means fast charging is enabled. That's what my phone does with the Apple 29W charger and USB-C cable.
also what zeyphersan said.. apple only put the odds at roughly 1:1,000,000 (which statistically is higher than Touch ID's odds). but in cases of direct relations and/or children with facial features that are not fully developed (e.g. all babies looking REALLY similar) those odds are going to drop drastically.
If you don't like the wear, I would recommend the silicone. All of the leather will change color, scratch, mark, etc. Some may say this gives it character but if it were the phone that was scratched, they likely wouldn't say it adds character to the phone haha. ;)
No. If it's not your face it's the wrong face. Whether it's similar to yours or not is irrelevant.
That's true, but the implications of it are really limited. The training is only temporary and requires you to enter the password immediately after a failure. So while you can teach it the wrong face if it is over the threshold, you have to do so pretty deliberately
oh sweet. Just 3 more apps on my home screen yet to be updated. ChargePoint, Spotify, and Google MapsSonos updated their app with x support. Going from the old apps to properly supported ones feels great.
I definitely prefer the silicone over the leather. It feels way better in the hand and the red one I have from my 6 hasn't aged at all.
I definitely prefer the silicone over the leather. It feels way better in the hand and the red one I have from my 6 hasn't aged at all.
If you don't like the wear, I would recommend the silicone. All of the leather will change color, scratch, mark, etc. Some may say this gives it character but if it were the phone that was scratched, they likely wouldn't say it adds character to the phone haha. ;)
oh sweet. Just 3 more apps on my home screen yet to be updated. ChargePoint, Spotify, and Google Maps
oh sweet. Just 3 more apps on my home screen yet to be updated. ChargePoint, Spotify, and Google Maps
I'm tempted to get a white silicone case, but I remember not being in love with the silicone case I had on my 6.
I hated how much lint it would attract from my pocket. I would always see tons of lint along the edges of the screen between the case and the phone. Also I can see the white one getting grimy real quick.
The leather case just feels a lot more premium to me. I had the black leather for the better part of 3 years on my 6 and it basically just got smoother over time, never cracked or showed any other imperfections due to wear. I could see that happening with the lighter colors though. This time I got Aubergine so I'm not sure how that will hold up.
If I don't stay leather I`m leaning White or Black - my wife picked one up at launch and she's been happy
I`ve used the Black, Product Red & Saddle Brown cases over the years for every iPhone since 5- the Black and the Brown seem to wear the best but Cosmos Blue reminds me of the Product Red Leather Case which looked awful after a few months
Definitely get it swapped. I had a scratch under the screen on my original and swapped it. Totally worth it.Just found a small piece of dust/debris inside the camera lens on the back. Luckily, it doesn't seem to affect image quality. Still thinking of getting it swapped, since I shouldn't be dealing with this sort of thing with a brand new $1100 phone.
You can go to Apple, it's their product and still under warranty.If you got your phone from att can you replace your phone for defect in Apple store or do I need to go through att
Same hereJust found a small piece of dust/debris inside the camera lens on the back. Luckily, it doesn't seem to affect image quality. Still thinking of getting it swapped, since I shouldn't be dealing with this sort of thing with a brand new $1100 phone.
My delivery order says no signature required. I didn't know that was an option, has anyone had UPS leave their phone at their residence?
Yeah, delivery times are already down to 2-3 weeks in Europe, should go down in NA soon too. I think if you check the pick-up options in the mornings you should be able to get it even earlier.This should be easy enough to get in Toronto before Christmas if ordering soon, right? I heard before it was going to be impossible.
Definitely get it swapped. I had a scratch under the screen on my original and swapped it. Totally worth it.
They usually have extra stock set aside for replacements.If there's none in stock, what happens? Can they order you one in while you keep yours?
Yep, Apple usually requires signature but sometimes the carriers don't (AT&T didn't for me). FedEx left mine at the door and didn't even knock. Luckily I had heard the truck and went to my door to check.
I had to go through this exact thing. This was on launch day. They had no new stock of black to sell but they did get two "repair" units - these are basically units Apple sends to stores for replacement purposes when a device breaks. They don't come in a retail box. Since the phone is brand new, I didn't care they were repair units. These are considered repair units not for sale (which are normally refurbished units). So I swapped mine out for that. The box is came in was basically a slim plain white box, not much thicker than the phone itself, I got to keep my original box and accessories. The phone was brand new, had the plastic still on it.If there's none in stock, what happens? Can they order you one in while you keep yours?
If there's none in stock, what happens? Can they order you one in while you keep yours?