This is a one way street and Sony knows it. Do this and open up the path to cross play AAA also. See you in team Xbox vs team PS in BFV!
This is not a bad thing.
This is a one way street and Sony knows it. Do this and open up the path to cross play AAA also. See you in team Xbox vs team PS in BFV!
Acknowledgement isn't at all a confirmation in my eyes. My post was more of the thought that once Sony drops this console cross-play stance these triple A devs will suddenly jump into the mix. I am not at all saying they will not eventually make a move towards it. I know they will and it would be very silly to argue against it.On the contrary, EA (the maker of Battlefield!) recently said this regarding crossplay...
Acknowledgement isn't at all a confirmation in my eyes. My post was more of the thought that once Sony drops this console cross-play stance these triple A devs will suddenly jump into the mix. I am not at all saying they will not eventually make a move towards it. I know they will and it would be very silly to argue against it.
well Nintendo does it. Why shouldn't Sony?Regarding Minecraft I totally support Sony's stance on that one. You have to have an Xbox account to play it cross-play. In no way shape or form should Sony force Xbox users to make PlayStation accounts or Xbox force PlayStation users to make Xbox accounts.
And thats coming from someone that has all three systems, PC and phone.
I fully agree. I just don't expect these big triple A players to just instantly embrace cross-play once Sony stops being a total dope with their stance. I think people who make statements as such are just setting themselves up for disappointment. Maybe I am misreading something for which I apologize if so. Just seems like some are wanting an instant 100% once the wall goes down. Which isn't at all reasonable.For anything to happen, there first needs to be the will to change things
Pretty much. MS's policies they tried to have would have affected every Xbox One owner. Cross play affects a small handful of people who care about playing a small handful of games with people on a different console.
Regarding Minecraft I totally support Sony's stance on that one. You have to have an Xbox account to play it cross-play. In no way shape or form should Sony force Xbox users to make PlayStation accounts or Xbox force PlayStation users to make Xbox accounts.
And thats coming from someone that has all three systems, PC and phone.
Exactly. It's like Sony didn't learn anything from the PSN cracking kerfuffle. They are still giving these vague non-answers and hoping that the issue goes away if they don't take much heed of it. Sure, this won't have near the same impact, but I seriously doubt the benefits from this policy come near the negative publicity at this point.I don't think Sony announcing crossplay/cross platform support is a mic drop moment. It's something you put in a press release and release on a Friday afternoon. Companies walking back controversial stances are almost never big press conference events. Doubt we'd see it at a PS5 reveal. It's associated with being a negative even if the reversal of the policy is a positive.
Guess times are different. If I asked my parents for another console they'd tell me I already have one and to just play that. Most of my friends were in the same boat lol.
Nobody has a good answer for this. I've asked it multiple times and the best people can come up with is "goodwill"
We're no longer holding your account hostage...No judgements, lol. :)
I honestly can see Sony riding this out till the PS5 reveal event. It is just too damn good of a PR "mic drop" moment to pass up. Not that I wish they will stupidly wait that long.
As I told Rocco, the conversation I was having at the time wasn't at all about the account locking. :)We're no longer holding your account hostage...
Mic drop... Fucking lol.
How about the fact that their friend(s) don't have to buy a PS4 to play with the person that doesn't play on Xbox One/Switch?How about the fact that they dont have to buy an xbox or switch to play Fortnite with their friends that dont play on ps4.
Should all Ubisoft and EA games be blocked then since you log into a third party account? What about connecting your steam account to your PSN when Portal 2 came out on the PS3? But a Microsoft email is somehow too wildly different?Regarding Minecraft I totally support Sony's stance on that one. You have to have an Xbox account to play it cross-play. In no way shape or form should Sony force Xbox users to make PlayStation accounts or Xbox force PlayStation users to make Xbox accounts.
And thats coming from someone that has all three systems, PC and phone.
Even then the message:As I told Rocco, the conversation I was having at the time wasn't at all about the account locking. :)
Caught up? Sony has been at the front of cross-play. The no console cross-play policy is a business decision. Not a technology one.Even then the message:
We finally caught up isn't all that mic drop worthy either
I could totally play on the XBX after declining to create an Epic account.No you can't. I couldn't play on the switch at all without making a new epic account, doesn't get past the start screen without it.
Well that explains that. So even though I declined to make an account twice, I have one, but it's tied to my Live account?(Also, as far as Epic is concerned, you do make an epic account even if you don't explicitly create one, they make one on hte backend for you).
Caught up? Sony has been at the front of cross-play. The no console cross-play policy is a business decision. Not a technology one.
I really wish you and other people would stop reacting to my posts as if I am defending Sony. It is getting very much damn annoying."Front of cross-play" Yeah, right. They never, ever pushed crossplay and only had a few crossplay games that didn't affect their bottom line so they didn't see it as a threat. Business decision my ass; what's the harm of not allowing Minecraft crossplay? The Xbox version has a bigger playerbase by itself, and now with the Better Together update you lump in Switch, PC, iOS and Andriod and tell me how that wouldn't be advantageous for PS4 players? Rocket League, which tops the charts for every platform?
Please.
Repeating it over and over in this thread as if it somehow makes you the last bastion of truth does make you appear to be a shill.I really wish you and other people would stop reacting to my posts as if I am defending Sony. It is getting very much damn annoying.
For the very last time:
I AM NOT IN SUPPORT OF SONY FOR THEIR CONSOLE CROSS-PLAY STANCE. I AM NOT IN SUPPORT OF SONY FOR THE ACCOUNT LOCKING.
With that out of the way, Sony has clearly made it known that the decision for their policy is business based. Merely mentioning it doesn't at all mean I am defending it or shilling for it.
I never made any implications that Sony is pushing cross-play more. They certainly have more titles on their systems that are cross-play enabled (which is why I use the wording "front of cross-play") than Microsoft and Nintendo, but I didn't at all imply they are the ones pushing it.
Yes, I will defend myself when someone takes my posts and twist them to push a false narrative. How does that at all remotely make me a Sony shill?Repeating it over and over in this thread as if it somehow makes you the last bastion of truth does make you appear to be a shill.
Caught up? Sony has been at the front of cross-play. The no console cross-play policy is a business decision. Not a technology one.
Correction: console cross-playWell , hard to say that when they are the one under fire regarding the crossplay issue now
It's a stupid notion to say they've 'been at the front' of it to begin with, there were only a handful of titles with any meaningful crossplay on any system prior to this gen. You might as well say Microsoft was at the forefront of it because Shadowrun existed last gen. Or FF11, which was on both systems. It's completely disingenuous to act like Sony was where MS/Nintendo are now, last gen, and that it flipped - Sony was never remotely here, none of them were.
It's a stupid notion to say they've 'been at the front' of it to begin with, there were only a handful of titles with any meaningful crossplay on any system prior to this gen. You might as well say Microsoft was at the forefront of it because Shadowrun existed last gen. Or FF11, which was on both systems. It's completely disingenuous to act like Sony was where MS/Nintendo are now, last gen, and that it flipped - Sony was never remotely here, none of them were.
It's a stupid notion to say they've 'been at the front' of it to begin with, there were only a handful of titles with any meaningful crossplay on any system prior to this gen. You might as well say Microsoft was at the forefront of it because Shadowrun existed last gen. Or FF11, which was on both systems. It's completely disingenuous to act like Sony was where MS/Nintendo are now, last gen, and that it flipped - Sony was never remotely here, none of them were.
I never made any implications that Sony is pushing cross-play more. They certainly have more titles on their systems that are cross-play enabled (which is why I use the wording "front of cross-play") than Microsoft and Nintendo, but I didn't at all imply they are the ones pushing it.
First, I never said anything about the games being Sony first party titles.I would agree with this. And none of the crossplay games that have come on PS3/4 have been Sony titles. It's all third party bits. Microsoft are publishing one of their first party titles (Minecraft) on every single platform and have squeezed full cross-play into it (apart from one obvious console). Pretty impressive for a platform holder.
I think that it's fair to say that everyone here, especially after 119 pages of hearing that excuse, realizes that Sony is a business and that their decisions are made from that perspective. Repeating it over and over that they're an business in an attempt to quell this discussion doesn't improve your point.I really wish you and other people would stop reacting to my posts as if I am defending Sony. It is getting very much damn annoying.
For the very last time:
I AM NOT IN SUPPORT OF SONY FOR THEIR CONSOLE CROSS-PLAY STANCE. I AM NOT IN SUPPORT OF SONY FOR THE ACCOUNT LOCKING.
With that out of the way, Sony has clearly made it known that the decision for their policy is business based. Merely mentioning it doesn't at all mean I am defending it or shilling for it.
I never made any implications that Sony is pushing cross-play more. They certainly have more titles on their systems that are cross-play enabled (which is why I use the wording "front of cross-play") than Microsoft and Nintendo, but I didn't at all imply they are the ones pushing it.
I completely agree, but I only ever said it once and it was merely explaining to another poster that Sony's asinine policy was based on business and not that of technology like they were claiming. My post was completely taken out of context to rage at.I think that it's fair to say that everyone here, especially after 119 pages of hearing that excuse, realizes that Sony is a business and that their decisions are made from that perspective. Repeating it over and over that they're an business in an attempt to quell this discussion doesn't improve your point.
Also the one who is at the forefront is generally the same entity that is also pushing it. I disagree with Sony being at the forefront of crossplay at this point in time, they've lost that position.
100%. Agreed.To be fair Sony were at the forefront of cross play. That's what makes their current stance look even more embarrassing and short sighted.
I honestly do not understand why anyone would be against this but if you don't care about it, yourself, that's totally cool with me. However, If you come into places of discussion offering excuses or defenses for Sony, then you absolutely are trying to halt progress. All we have is good ol' fashioned grass roots internet outrage to try to get Sony to change their position and if you're in here trying to calm the storm you're hurting not helping the momentum. In this instance, when you defend Playstation, you're putting THEIR corporate profit margins (because there is absolutely nothing else at stake here and even this is debatable) over your fellow gamer's fun and I think that's totally uncool. If you don't want crossplay and have nothing to contribute than get out of the way of people that do.
Also, empathy is a pretty basic human function. If you find yourself unable to empathize with others, I would suggest talking to a psychologist.
Gotcha.I completely agree, but I only ever said it once and it was merely explaining to another poster that Sony's asinine policy was based on business and not that of technology like they were claiming. My post was completely taken out of context to rage at.
Yep, they just look like a bunch of petty arseholes. Allowing some but not all, because reasons.To be fair Sony were at the forefront of cross play. That's what makes their current stance look even more embarrassing and short sighted.
Hilariously patronizing, who the hell are you to go around telling people to visit a psychologist for not caring about your silly little crusade. Jesus Christ lol.
The whole talk about the "technology" of cross-play and how "far" different platform holders are in that is silly.
95% of the effort to implement cross-play / cross-progress features (if not 100%) is with the developers and completely independent of the platform.
(Which is also why it's evasive to say that you are thinking about solutions: you don't need to, you just need to stop blocking the existing solutions)
Yep, they just look like a bunch of petty arseholes. Allowing some but not all, because reasons.
I'm willing to bet that the number of people who play Fortnite and literally no other multiplayer game that would require Gold/Plus is significantly smaller than the number of people affected by this account issue.
The difference being that there is evidence that very little care about cross platform play. It's not a big deal that Fortnite is behind a paywall because multiplayer being behind a paywall is now an accepted norm.If that were a bigger issue, it'd actually be brought on it's own, and not only in the context of or in reaction to Crossplay.
The difference being that there is evidence that very little care about cross platform play. It's not a big deal that Fortnite is behind a paywall because multiplayer being behind a paywall is now an accepted norm.
Sony's stance on crossplay is an oxymoron. We allow crossplay but we don't, I really wish these hardware makers would stay out of telling third party publishers what they can do and who they can do it with unless it really is to protect them (hate games and offensive titles etc.). Apple might have a stance that all purchases have to go through them but are they blocking anyone from reading Kindle books on an iPad?
All Sony is doing is highlighting how fucked up the console market is.