Which is exactly what Baji said. You're just repeating what Baji said.It's less than 15% of the 88% group or less than 13% of the total group seeking asylum.
Which is exactly what Baji said. You're just repeating what Baji said.It's less than 15% of the 88% group or less than 13% of the total group seeking asylum.
Seriously, I came in here to toe the middle line and say "This could be a coincidence but it's not outlandish enough to brush it off as such, so let's make note of it before moving on, in case it's relevant in the future."This thread is genuinely hilarious. You know when people say both sides are the same? This is what they mean. Not that both sides cause the same impact, but that both sides have the capacity to be completely crazy and ignore all logic and reason when it suits their political agenda.
Which is exactly what Baji said. You're just repeating what Baji said.
This is a false equivalence
https://www.adl.org/education/references/hate-symbols/1488
Find the adl library entry on Hillary running a child porn ring out of a pizza restaurant.
Oh, the Cheese Pizza code isn't in there? Gee I wonder why.
Maybe because one of these is real, and the other isn't.
Considering Every single one of those tweets are all their initial reactions of them coming across the statement for the first time, and instantly picking out 14 words and 88, before any of us got a hold of it, no, that sounds like a pretty stupid explanation.
Here. Let's do some fuckjg math.
Let's say the DHS article is referring to the numbers from FY2015 2nd quarter.
1,147 were found to have reasonable fear upon fear pass.
DHS article says less than 13 of 88 were actually granted asylum from this group. In other words, less that 14.8%
14.8% of 1,147 is 170.
So they converted 170/1,147 to 13/88 for no fucking reason.
To be fair we debated about joining the nazis. That debate was the reason internment camps didn't apply to German Americans. Though I doubt the discussion was ever "necessary" considering the racial politics back then.
It is less than 13 of the 88. I don't doubt the "less than 13" is an actual, correct stat. It's the 15% (well actually 14.8%) that is a derived number coming from people who keep saying "well why didn't they just say 14%, why are they grabbing 88 from out of thin air" or whatever, when I've pointed out time and again where that number came from and why it isn't that odd for it to be used as a stat.Yes, my point was it's still not less than 13 of 88 as the article wrote it. They had to play with the numbers to present it that way. This all may be some giant coincidence, but it a very strange way to present statistics.
The ADL doesn't do much about pedophiles: it's pretty focused on white supremacy.
But the FBI has this. See the similarity to this pizza place's logo? Can't be a coincidence, right?
That has nothing to do with anything I said.The tweet in the OP is timestamped at 12; the earliest white supremacist tweet you've quoted that I see was at 1. And considering the DHS article is from February, it seems pretty clear that this is white supremacists reacting to the controversy rather than the article's inherent naziness.
I don't give a fuck what they see, lol
This is conspiracy level tier logic.
There are plenty of real and justified issues without resorting to this level of thinking.
What the fuck does that have to do with anything?
Did Hillary have that symbol on the missing emails?
That has nothing to do with anything I said.
They aren't even referencing or showing any knowledge of, or sharing any links to 'triggered libs' anywhere on that timeline.
It is literally just all about them celebrating getting nazi winks....
And yeah, it was long before any of US started talking about this shit.
The US didn't put German Americans in camps because Germans are the single largest ethnic group in the country.To be fair we debated about joining the nazis. That debate was the reason internment camps didn't apply to German Americans. Though I doubt the discussion was ever "necessary" considering the racial politics back then.
No it is not, it is obvious and for everybody to see. The chances of it being coincidence are lower than the chances it is intention.
...It's one of the pizza places in the conspiracy. An alleged secret pedophile hangout, frequented by high-level Democrats.
The FBI says that's a pedophile symbol, it's clearly in the pizza joint's logo. Some people see evidence of a conspiracy, reasonable people see coincidence. See the parallel to this thread?
*sigh*
"You guys" was the term the other person used. Pretty vague term: why do you pretend it applies specifically to this forum, and not "conspiracy-minded internet liberals" in general? If you put in half as much effort trying to understand what others are saying as you do looking for secret Nazi codes you'd save me a lot of effort.
And to be clear: it's also not "David Duke is responding directly to hours of entertainment." (but it's only one hour after he saw it! checkmate!) It's "David Duke is responding to a brewing Twitterstorm and is now entertained by the rubes that bought into it."
Again: the fact that Nazis are taking credit is not evidence that it's a post by a cryptofascist, it's evidence Twitter nazis love watching and contributing to shitstorms.
No it is not, it is obvious and for everybody to see. The chances of it being coincidence are lower than the chances it is intention.
Including some number stuff it puts it close to 23 theories, but we actually know Neonazis use this code, that is not a theory. But even without the numbers they "rhyme" their claim on a Neonazi claim.
So:
1. Neonazis use this "code"
2. Is it really that strange there is one or more Neonazi(s) working at DHS???
3. Nothing indicates there is a full blown conspiracy to take over the DHS and then the US.
This seems a bit of a reach, however at the same time the US did take in a lot of Nazis after the war.
It might be obvious to those looking at it with confirmation bias.
You must know, we see through your lame attempt to hide your real username "8859"No, it's documented neo nazi dog whistles and symbology.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteen_Words
You don't accidentally pull off a 1488.
88's, sure.
A 14 words, suspect, but sure it can happen.
A 1488? In a release about fucking immigration? Not a coincidence.
Some of you'll need to watch this. Fascist dog whistling isn't a conspiracy Jesus christ
Huh, the math is wrong. 30% of 88 is 26. It should be 43 instead of 88.
From the Jake Paul thread:
mango. Member
#66
You should go practice the Hitler salute in front of a mirror so you know how it looks like.
Leaning towards "Yup, this was probably intentional" but it'd be best not to dwell on it. The more time we spend talking about a likely white supremacist dogwhistle, the less time we spend talking about their racist policies and overtly hateful comments. Looking for nazis in the shadows while someone endorsed by the KKK sits at the White House is like bailing water of a sinking ship without fixing the hole first.
...did highlighting this government statement just made the situation worst?Jesus his now Pinned tweet from 3 hours ago is even spelled out to the end
...you really are not a student of history, are you?
in case there's any uber rational logic spock good sirs still in this thread convinced that a post describing fascist DHS policy "just happened to" start with "We must secure" as though that turn of phrase is innocuous and unloaded,
Not true is this case.You are aware that Google tweaks your search results to reflect your browsing history, right?