This just proves review scores for video games means jack shit.
Yeah. Sales do.
10+ Million and still selling strong. Woo.
Will eventually outsell 64 and Galaxy.
This just proves review scores for video games means jack shit.
Really? How do? From what I remember, I feel like pretty much any Mario badguy/minion could have filled their parts.
except when you agree with them I'm sureThis just proves review scores for video games means jack shit.
Probably, but (a) the "rabbits = moon" connection is obscure outside of Japanese culture, and (b) there isn't a strong thematic tie to the Moon for most of the game. Just another example of Obscure Cultural References in Video Games, I guess.They are rabbits for more reasons than that, actually. Rabbits are connected to the moon in Japanese folklore iirc, that's part of why the game culminates in the moon and the end game takes place there
How so? An opinion from a video game outlet is just as legimate as any other human being, only reviewers are encouraged to process their thoughts in more depth.This just proves review scores for video games means jack shit.
It feels more like the idea of Odyssey is doing well, but the game itself doesn't really live up to the hype. Overall the level design is possibly the most mediocre of the 3D games in terms of presenting gameplay challenges and Mario's movement is so powerful and easy to execute that the obstacles that are there are barely obstacles at all. I still enjoyed it, but it felt so much smaller as someone that enjoys a platforming game for platforming and the adventure elements weren't quite good enough to make up for its shortcomings. Still a great game but not the ultimate 3D Mario some people make it out to be.Yeah. Sales do.
10+ Million and still selling strong. Woo.
Will eventually outsell 64 and Galaxy.
When were the creative with Koopalings? I can excuse SMB3 because of its era -- but some of those Koopalings were identical in mechanics. SMW, same deal... I can't think of any title where each of the Koopalings individually has some interesting boss mechanic.
Bowser Jr. has gotten so much care over time. I wish they could do that with each of the Koopalings in some new title.
It feels more like the idea of Odyssey is doing well, but the game itself doesn't really live up to the hype. Overall the level design is possibly the most mediocre of the 3D games in terms of presenting gameplay challenges and Mario's movement is so powerful and easy to execute that the obstacles that are there are barely obstacles at all. I still enjoyed it, but it felt so much smaller as someone that enjoys a platforming game for platforming and the adventure elements weren't quite good enough to make up for its shortcomings. Still a great game but not the ultimate 3D Mario some people make it out to be.
Talking sales, 3D Land is on pace to eventually outsell Galaxy on a much less popular system, and it doesn't have the benefit of the hype and platform momentum Odyssey is enjoying.
It feels more like the idea of Odyssey is doing well, but the game itself doesn't really live up to the hype. Overall the level design is possibly the most mediocre of the 3D games in terms of presenting gameplay challenges and Mario's movement is so powerful and easy to execute that the obstacles that are there are barely obstacles at all. I still enjoyed it, but it felt so much smaller as someone that enjoys a platforming game for platforming and the adventure elements weren't quite good enough to make up for its shortcomings. Still a great game but not the ultimate 3D Mario some people make it out to be.
Talking sales, 3D Land is on pace to eventually outsell Galaxy on a much less popular system, and it doesn't have the benefit of the hype and platform momentum Odyssey is enjoying.
Not to mention that a lot of the platforming challenges felt far more unfair than anything from 3D World thanks to poorly thought out gimmicks. It really seems sometimes that some of the challenges were less about reacting to newer obstacles and more rote memorization of what will happen (Dark Side in particular is incredibly guilty about this)
Making a logical fallacy isn't doing much. I explained why I felt the way I did. Not all arguments are equal. A reasoned argument is definitely worth more than "IT'S SHIT LOL!" or "OMG BEST GAME EVER!" with nothing else and appeals to authority and appeals to popularity.Your opinion is not worth any more than anyone else's here.
Sunshine, Galaxy, 3D World all have their detractors.
Making a logical fallacy isn't doing much. I explained why I felt the way I did. Not all arguments are equal. A reasoned argument is definitely worth more than "IT'S SHIT LOL!" or "OMG BEST GAME EVER!" with nothing else and appeals to authority and appeals to popularity.
there isn't a strong thematic tie to the Moon for most of the game.
Dismissing my arguments that way is a strawman.You're the one coming in the defense of the "IT'S SHIT LOL!" guy.
Odyssey is not a misfire in any relevant way. There's no game that everybody likes.
Dismissing my arguments that way is a strawman.
Your arguments for why Odyssey is amazing is that reviewers say it is and that it's popular, neither of which are good arguments because they're fallacies. My argument details specific reasons why the game itself falls short for me. Sure you can say it's not a misfire because it's popular and will make Nintendo money, but that's not a good argument for how it fares as a game.
Opinions are a funny thing aren't they?This just proves review scores for video games means jack shit.
What's wrong with Rosalina?
They are rabbits for more reasons than that, actually. Rabbits are connected to the moon in Japanese folklore iirc, that's part of why the game culminates in the moon and the end game takes place there
And huh, wedding > honeymoon....wha?
The moon is front and center everywhere.
It's very visible in the sky of every world, it also often shows up in the cutscenes, it's absolutely massive in the first world you are in, and you literally collect moons to power up the ship. And that's of course not to speak of the last world and the bonus stages taking place on it, too.
Seeing these refreshing and bold takes that SMO sucks reminds me of just how fun Summer ERA is.
I don't think anybody was arguing that the game isn't successful from a sales and popularity standpoint. Hot take guy seems to feel that the game was unsuccessful in living up to the hype and that review scores and sales are a bad indicator of how good a game is and don't account for the myriad of factors that effect what people like in a game.I'm not arguing for my liking of Odyssey. I'm arguing for its success.
Or are you going to say it wasn't successful? Guess we were just arguing about different things,
Seeing these refreshing and bold takes that SMO sucks reminds me of just how fun Summer ERA is.
I especially like the historical revisionists claiming Sunshine was ever good.
Blegh personality, Blegh design. Such a basic princess, feels like a soulless other-peach but with a star and in blue. Daisy and Pauline exude so much more style and differing attitudes and are good compliments to Peach.
Not sure I agree, but ok.Blegh personality, Blegh design. Such a basic princess, feels like a soulless other-peach but with a star and in blue. Daisy and Pauline exude so much more style and differing attitudes and are good compliments to Peach.
But the Broodals? They feel like out of place rabbit enemies. Even the rabbids in Mario and Rabbids had more of a lasting impression. I don't think we'll see this guys again, do you?