• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Oct 25, 2017
12,457
Yikes! If you own one of Samsung's Galaxy smartphones and use the company's messaging app, you may want to alter its permissions. According to several reports, a bug is causing Samsung Messages to send random pictures to users' contacts.
According to Reddit users, the glitch is found on several phones; there are reports of the Galaxy S9, S9 Plus, and Note 8 being affected, with one person claiming his entire gallery was sent to his girlfriend in the middle of the night. It appears that the issue isn't limited to a certain carrier, either, as people on T-Moblie and AT&T have discovered the problem.

What's especially concerning is that the devices hold no record of anything being sent. The only way to know is by checking carrier logs—or when a contact asks why they received an 'artistic nude' of yourself at 2 am.

It seems as if the phantom photo-sender bug appeared in the latest update of Samsung Messages, so anyone who hasn't already done so may want to hold off from installing it until the company addresses the issue.

Those who have already installed the update should probably disable Samsung Messages' storage permissions, which will prevent it from accessing the photo gallery. Just go to Settings > Apps -> Samsung Messages > Permissions > Storage to do so.

Once permissions are revoked, you won't be able to send photos from Messenger, but you can rest easy knowing your pictures aren't going to appear on a random contact's handset. In the meantime, you might want to try Android Messages, which comes with a helpful web version that allows users to send and receive texts from a desktop.

https://www.techspot.com/news/75302...tch-could-sending-photos-random-contacts.html
 

Pasha

Banned
Jan 27, 2018
3,018
Something tells me that the only "glitch" going on here is that the photos are being sent to random contacts instead of Samsungs database.
 

Morrigan

Spear of the Metal Church
Member
Oct 24, 2017
34,308
I have a Samsung Galaxy A5. My messaging app is the default one and is just called "Messages", is that the same app, or is the app specifically called "Samsung Messages"?
 

dragn

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt-account
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
881
what was in the boyfriends gallery is the question :3
 

Morrigan

Spear of the Metal Church
Member
Oct 24, 2017
34,308

signal

Member
Oct 28, 2017
40,183
This was also a bug in Android back in like 2010 and no one at Google could figure it out for those it affected. It was the reason I switched from Android for the first time and bought an iphone lol. Wasn't a separate app though was just any sms.
 

MCN

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
2,289
United Kingdom
I have an S7, so I don't seem to be affected. But if I was, I'm sure people would be very confused by the random cat photos.
 

Zing

Banned
Oct 29, 2017
1,771
"Honey, why have you sent a dozen dick pics to these other women?"

"Uh... must be a glitch."
 

Deleted member 3815

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,633

What? I am sure that they would love the pictures that I send them, after all who doesn't love spotted dick. ;p

spotteddickandcustar_87835_16x9.jpg
 

TheMadTitan

Member
Oct 27, 2017
27,208
I use Textra because the default app is lacking in features and customization.

My incessant need to change the way everything looks is justified, clearly.
 
Oct 26, 2017
3,323

BLEEN

Member
Oct 27, 2017
21,871
But that entry says the leaks were due to targeted phishing attacks, not iCloud itself getting hacked.

Nowhere near the same thing as what's currently happening with these Samsung phones (which also isn't a hack, but yeah...).
That is true. I was using the term 'hack' very loosely. Mostly just putting your attention to the original Fappening snafu which most know originated straight from iCloud.

Fappening 2.0 and 3.0 (lol) also happened but were swept under the rug pretty swiftly. I believe those photos were obtained not only from iCloud but other online sources as well.
 
Oct 25, 2017
1,705
this is supremely suspicious

if this is a "glitch", what possible "intended behavior" could decay into this result?