1280x1024 I can't tell you how many times this aspect ratio has fuxked me. Text going off screen, cutscenes looking terrible. Fov sucking in most games. Really want to buy a 1080p monitor but I should upgrade my 750ti first.
1440p @ 120+ hertz is the sweet spot. Doesn't require a second mortgage in hardware, and it looks amazing.
People got 4k TVs, want 4k content, and the console companies are more than glad to deliver.I've been on the "4K gaming is being pushed way too early" bandwagon for quite some time now.
This. I could run game on medium/low at 4k/60 or 4k/30, I prefer 1080/120 or 1440p/60 with max settings though.It means nothing. A GTX 1060 is capable of achieving 4K gaming.
Many PC gamers can play at 4K, but they prefer higher frame-rate over 4K resolution.
rofli find it absolutely amazing how most (well, at least ALOT of) pc gamers in era play at 4K based on performance threads
rich fucks, i am still rocking 720p and it's serving me just fine
i find it absolutely amazing how most (well, at least ALOT of) pc gamers in era play at 4K based on performance threads
rich fucks, i am still rocking 720p and it's serving me just fine
They're nearly tied, with a slight edge for UW. 2560x1080 and 3440x1440 together are 1.37% of the market.Ultrawide crowd is even lower which doesn't bode well for universal future games adaptation :(
My desk is already crowded with my 1080p monitor, a 1024p 4:3 monitor and my cintiq. Fuck that 27" mess. I'd like HDR, but it's locked behind unnecessary premiumsAnother thing I've noticed with 4k monitors is that they basically only come in sizes that are quite a bit larger than monitors of the past came in. 27" screens and up. For people PC gaming on a desk, that may seem too big.
That is my first thought. There are people hooking up av cables to their brand new 60 inch tvsI'm surprised it's that high given how much performance and equipment it takes.
There are more 1080p options than 4k on stores... if you look at cheaper options then 1080p are the only options.