The burden of proof is on the HillaryBros who seem to pluck anecdotes out of the twitterspherical ether in order to claim that Sanders converted Dems who would've voted for Clinton but then abandoned the Party because of him by Election Day.
Because it's a damn good cassette tape. Hopefully people make him out of date by adopting his policy on allowing inmates to vote for example.
Made this just for you:
What a bad thing for people to treat climate change an existential threat and demand reform now.
his delivery sucks and we always know the punchline because it is always the same.
Well of course it's the same. We're still dealing with those same problems. As icy said it, we haven't reformed our country yet.
his message sucked when he talked about taxes to pay for universal healthcare.
Imagine having an act so rich after decades consistently performing the same songs, that your cassette tape is refined and still revitalisingly fresh 20-30 years later.
The polls spoke for themselves. Great amount of Bernie supporters voted for Hillary. Hillary had the most votes. I thought that's why the majority of this forum blamed it on the electorate? Trump won on merit now?
Being an old white dude doesn't mean he can't make my life better. He would also be the first Jewish president btw.
don't worry, Warren is going to win Iowa leaving Bernie struggling and he will flat out lose hard in South Carolina
In his defense it shows that he, in fact, did do some stuff
And this is why Chapo soundbites are bad.
Because they view her as a threat to their preferred candidate. Or are just right wing trolls.
We have even less evidence that Sanders voters didnt vote for Hillary which cost her the election. Other than anecdotal, crazy things people said online. Many of which were ousted as Russian trolls. People even in this election cycle still are falling for and responding to Russian trolls imitating Sanders fans. I figured they would've learned but the Bernie hate is blind among many.
So on one hand Bernie is completely unrealistic and can never pull off his ambitions which would upset and disrupt tons of people within politics. On the other hand, he should also be satisfied with what he has and stop now that he has momentum and a growing movement within politics. After the 2016 election there were many Democrats, including Kamala, that started working with him on creating bills. Hillary made concessions and also adopted a few of the things he preached about in his campaign. Now we have a whole field of candidates spouting the same stuff as him in this election cycle. I'm curious if he kept going, if he could continue to get more people within politics supporting his policies. He sounds like a broken cassette drilling in the same information but that same strategy somehow worked with Fox News and brainwashed who knows how many people.
If you actually dig into that "active plotting" stuff, it reads like a self-fulfilling prophecy from Bernie's side as well. i.e. the email they hold up as a smoking gun is a single email where someone, out of the blue, suggests asking Sanders about his religion (and no evidence that anyone ever did, let alone did at the behest of the DNC).
Tbh, from Harris's previous interviews on the subject it seems more like she wants to actually eliminate private insurance (though she's not set on it) but her staffers know that's not a good stance for the general public and try to clean up her statements. She has literally said that she wants to wipe out private insurance point blank (Which I don't view as a positive in the least) and her staffers tried their best to contort that into something else.
