Right wing media is pushing a narrative that the "mainstream media" is refusing to say that he yelled, "Allah Akbar!"
AFAIK he did not know his victims. I feel like you're playing semantics. Before Orlando this was the largest mass shooting incident in this country and no one thought it was terrorism. You explicitly said a non-white would be automatically labeled a terrorist which is not the case. Most of the time with Islamic terror it is labeled what it is because the perpetrator makes a point of being unambiguous with the political nature of their crime and its ties to their interpretation of their faith, however jacked up that interpretation might be.You don't see the difference between someone shooting a centre of education/people they know and a mass shooting of strangers?
I noticed Trump tweeted very quickly unlike the Charlottesville and Vegas killings.Very odd timing that I'm sure will result in some hopefully not true crazy conspiracy theories. Do we know what set him off?
This idea that only brown people are called terrorists is simply not true. Sure people just assume it's terrorism if the person is a Muslim. It could be the person just cracked and just starting killing people. But seeing as there are countries, religious groups, and sects out by there encouraging and supporting these acts it's hard to not make that be association. Especially considering how easy it is for people to get connected with them online.
America had no problem calling Ted Kaczynski and Timothy McVey Terrorists. They were both white. But they had a clear political agenda. The IRA was labeled a terrorists organization as well. That clear purpose is what separates them from the other mass shootings in the US.
So trying to compare Columbine, Sandusky, and other acts of random violence with terrorism just doesn't work. I don't understand the need to try to create false equivalency. Does calling the asshole who shot up Vegas a terrorist make any difference for those who are Muslim terrorists? It's almost like people are taking it personally and saying "Oh my people are terrorists. Well your people are terrorists!". In some bizarre way to try to be more inclusive.
Dylann Roof on the other hand is a bit more complicated. We already have a label for him racist, white supremacist, and murderer. So when I read online that people we're saying he should be labeled a terrorist my reflex was to argue against that. But after thinking about it, he is without a doubt a terrorist. I'd even argue that he is part of one of the most successful terrorist organizations ever in this country. And that's something that we as a country need to address.
Now to bring this back to the original conversation, when seeing the picture of the perpetrator of this horrible act in New York it's hard for me not to jump to the conclusion of terrorism. Just as seeing a picture of a white shooter of a black church makes me immediately think racist. These are the unfortunate contexts that exist in our world.
But I want to make clear that it would be absolute stupidity to make the logical leap that these people represent the larger group as a whole.
The idea that someone suddenly becomes maniacally malicious through "religion" at the drop of a hat is audacious at best. Him (ironically, might I add) screaming "Allahu Akbar" just reeks of "I want to say what the "cool" (I'm using this word VERY loosely) terrorists bellow these days. It's a frivolous cry of "please, pay attention to me! I'm super scary! (and super f'd up)"
This is a time to remember the victims instead, don't bother spending a second of thought for the worthless scumbag. We don't try to humanise non-Muslim terrorists in our media right? Oh wait...
As for working on solutions to these problems, that's a whole other ball game to discuss another day.
If your initial reflex is to (essentially) rationalise Roof and not call him a terrorist, yet on the other hand leap to labelling "token brown boy bomber" then you might want to check yourself.
I've read the rest, and you're surprised that a maligned minority in America become defensive to instant labelling upon discovery that the perpetrator is "brown"? Of course we're going to take that personally, we've been tanking this rhetoric for over a decade now. It hasn't gotten any better, mind you.
No, this is an unfortunate lapse in your judgement. Have a better sense of proportion of this word.
Statistically speaking, the world has never been safer. The probability of your death occurring as the result of violence is so very remote as to be negligible.
Yeah, you might be a millennial if..... No, the world is a lot worse than in the past. It's actually opposite of safer. Believe me. We didn't have anything like this constantly. We didn't have drug issues like we do today, we didn't have murders going on as often as the records being set in the inner city. We had problems in the past, but not like we do today and not like anything that is coming up.
When I was a kid I didn't have to worry about Trump or World War 3.
It's not that they're not charged but that right leaning people don't call those people terrorists. They're the first to start calling others terrorists but never their own.The whole idea that white people are never charged with terrorism is an odd one that I've only seen on here and old gaf. Besides the obvious Ted Kaczynski and Timothy McVey, just this year a white nationalist was charged with terrorism in NYC.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-new...te-man-accused-hunting-down-black-men-n739146
Yeah, you might be a millennial if..... No, the world is a lot worse than in the past. It's actually opposite of safer. Believe me. We didn't have anything like this constantly. We didn't have drug issues like we do today, we didn't have murders going on as often as the records being set in the inner city. We had problems in the past, but not like we do today and not like anything that is coming up.
When I was a kid I didn't have to worry about Trump or World War 3.
Yeah, you might be a millennial if..... No, the world is a lot worse than in the past. It's actually opposite of safer. Believe me. We didn't have anything like this constantly. We didn't have drug issues like we do today, we didn't have murders going on as often as the records being set in the inner city. We had problems in the past, but not like we do today and not like anything that is coming up.
When I was a kid I didn't have to worry about Trump or World War 3.
You're thinking of Jesus."God is great and he wants me to kill a bunch of innocent people!"
I'll never understand how a human being can think this is ok. It's such an oxymoron. If god exists and he truly is as benevolent as his followers profess... I'd imagine you'd be burning in hell for committing such an act in his name.
And plenty of other things but I suppose now is not the time to get into all that. I'm just trying to express my sadness and anger in the most polite way I can.
Yeah, you might be a millennial if..... No, the world is a lot worse than in the past. It's actually opposite of safer. Believe me. We didn't have anything like this constantly. We didn't have drug issues like we do today, we didn't have murders going on as often as the records being set in the inner city. We had problems in the past, but not like we do today and not like anything that is coming up.
When I was a kid I didn't have to worry about Trump or World War 3.
Apprehended without deadly force is exactly what I said. Was he? He was.
"God is great and he wants me to kill a bunch of innocent people!"
I'll never understand how a human being can think this is ok. It's such an oxymoron. If god exists and he truly is as benevolent as his followers profess... I'd imagine you'd be burning in hell for committing such an act in his name.
You're right, I doubt there was anything rational going through his mind.I don't think that's how he rationalize it. The people aren't innocent in their minds.
Yeah, you might be a millennial if..... No, the world is a lot worse than in the past. It's actually opposite of safer. Believe me. We didn't have anything like this constantly. We didn't have drug issues like we do today, we didn't have murders going on as often as the records being set in the inner city. We had problems in the past, but not like we do today and not like anything that is coming up.
When I was a kid I didn't have to worry about Trump or World War 3.
When I was a kid, the world was worrying that IT COULD LITERALLY BLOW UP ANY SECOND. That was the basic state of existence from the 1940s to the early 1990s. When exactly were you a kid?Yeah, you might be a millennial if..... No, the world is a lot worse than in the past. It's actually opposite of safer. Believe me. We didn't have anything like this constantly. We didn't have drug issues like we do today, we didn't have murders going on as often as the records being set in the inner city. We had problems in the past, but not like we do today and not like anything that is coming up.
When I was a kid I didn't have to worry about Trump or World War 3.
Yes, he's from Uzbekistan. Some sources claim he yelled "allahu akbar".Do we actually know the truth? Everytime something like this happens one of the first things speculated is "ISIS/Al-Qaeda did it"
It's not that they're not charged but that right leaning people don't call those people terrorists. They're the first to start calling others terrorists but never their own.
Yeah, you might be a millennial if..... No, the world is a lot worse than in the past. It's actually opposite of safer. Believe me. We didn't have anything like this constantly. We didn't have drug issues like we do today, we didn't have murders going on as often as the records being set in the inner city. We had problems in the past, but not like we do today and not like anything that is coming up.
When I was a kid I didn't have to worry about Trump or World War 3.
Nothing random about a terror attack.