• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Toxi

The Fallen
Oct 27, 2017
17,550
It's funny to see people talking up Corbyn's success in 2017, ignoring the very special circumstances caused by Brexit which saw both Labour and the Conservatives increase their share of the vote. I genuinely have no idea why people have any confidence in Corbyn's ability to win the next election. It could happen, yes, but only if Brexit causes some kind of apocalypse.
Well...
 

lemonhat

Member
Dec 6, 2018
219
The Lib Dems might as well fuck off

They sold their soul for a taste of power

Exactly. As a part of the coalition government they share responsibility for everything it did. Austerity that proved economically counter-productive and ruined the lives of thousands and thousands, NHS re-organisation (that the Tories promised they wouldn't do before the election and so not only was there no mandate for it, it was a blatant betrayal of the voters), racist immigration policy and scapegoating of immigrants, awful reforms to education, decimation of further education sector, Royal Mail privatisation on the cheap, Universal Credit and on and on. Plus they happily participated in spreading the outrageous lie about Labours high levels of public spending being the cause of the debt and all the nonsense analogies comparing the national budget to a household one, and the nation's credit card and all that. The country is still suffering from the affects of this industrial scale misinformation campaign and the mistaken belief that the Tories have a stronger economic record than Labour (they don't. They're much much worse).

New Labour were responsible for a slew of awful things - hence the eventual rise of Corbyn and the shift to the left in the party to move on from that and regain the trust of the millions of voters who abandoned Labour since 1997. The Lib Dems need a similar renewal and shift away from anyone tarnished by the coalition years and the dregs of Tory-lite centrism. But clearly that's not easy when they have such a tiny number of MPs to build from and their current leader is one of the architects of Britain's current mess and his own party's 2015 implosion. Unless you live in a Tory-Lib Dem marginal where they're the least worst option then they really are a complete waste of time and fully deserve their time in the wilderness. It would help if Vince Cable fucked off and had a bit more self-reflection in regards the vast number of mistakes he and his party made and his responsibility for it. But he still prefers to punch left rather than come to terms with any of that.
 

PJV3

Member
Oct 25, 2017
25,676
London
don't really see an issue with that, if thats the tweet in question

I understand the problem with it if he's implying it's a collective responsibility for the decision made by a government, if he just meant people should stand together and put pressure on the government it's just empty words.

A bit of digging is soon going to show which way inclined he is.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
Normally, I would agree. But it would depend on the context to which these sorts of statements are made. When people call for Muslims to speak out against acts of terrorism, they do so on the basis of their belief that terrorism is done in the name of Islam, and therefore Muslims share a responsibility.

The same applies to those who ascribe blame to all Jews for the actions of Israel. But these people are generally public antisemites and their derogatory racial slurs towards Jews isn't limited to the Palestinian conflict. Likewise for those who call for Muslims to speak out. A quick scroll through their social media history would reveal they are indeed full-time bigots with overt prejudices.

If, however, there is only this one tweet, then it's possible that it was made in the context of repelling the narrative that being opposed to the State of Israel's actions = anti-Semitic. In that specific context, there is a difference. But then again, I wouldn't want to make that argument in favour of him because there are a million better ways to make the point that anti-Israeli government is not equivalent to anti-semitism. At the very least, that sort of tweet demands an explanation and apology. But is he an anti-semite?

Starting off your tweet with "Jewish people with any sense of humanity" isn't particularly a good look. It borders on being a "threat" more than it is an ethical concern around the state of Israel.

When you decide to break away from your party and place some of that onus on antisemitism, you shouldn't be surprised the internet digs through your history.

One can say the Labour party has poorly dealt with antisemitism but also that if you're going to make a scene and quit your party over it, you best make sure your own laundry is clean. Otherwise, public opinion will veer towards thinking you are just being opportunistic, not principled.

Doing this 30 days before Brexit is the height of being opportunistic before we even move onto questions around antisemitism.
 
Oct 27, 2017
3,587
Starting off your tweet with "Jewish people with any sense of humanity" isn't particularly a good look. It borders on being a "threat" more than it is an ethical concern around the state of Israel.

When you decide to break away from your party and place some of that onus on antisemitism, you shouldn't be surprised the internet digs through your history.

One can say the Labour party has poorly dealt with antisemitism but also that if you're going to make a scene and quit your party over it, you best make sure your own laundry is clean. Otherwise, public opinion will veer towards thinking you are just being opportunistic, not principled.

Doing this 30 days before Brexit is the height of being opportunistic before we even move onto questions around antisemitism.

That Tweet is from Derek Hatton, the ex-Militant entryist who has just been officially allowed to rejoin Labour after 30 years.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
That Tweet is from Derek Hatton, the ex-Militant entryist who has just been officially allowed to rejoin Labour after 30 years.

My bad for skimming. I thought Derek Hatton was one of the breakaways.

I guess that's even... worse? The guy was really before my time.

Ex-Militant leader Derek Hatton gloated 'it's good to be back' today after he was let back into Labour for the first time in decades.

The left-wing hardliner was expelled more than 30 years ago but was handed a membership card yesterday - the same day as seven moderate MP quit the party.

Mr Hatton mocked the 'pathetic' MPs who quit Labour over anti-Semitism, bullying and hard-left politics yesterday, claiming they had 'run away' from disagreement.

Hatton was the ringleader of the Trotskyist Militant tendency in the 1980s which set an illegal budget in Liverpool - causing 'grotesque chaos' in the city - and brought about bitter divisions in the party.

He was thrown out in 1986 but the party's disputes panel is said to have readmitted him last week after he was 'inspired' to return by Jeremy Corbyn's leadership.

The news of Hatton's return comes on the same day that seven Labour moderates quit the party in protest at Mr Corbyn's handling of Brexit and anti-Semitism.

Hatton was expelled soon afterwards by a vote of 12-6 in the national executive, sparking protests for and against him in Liverpool.

He later ran a property empire in Cyprus, and spent some time living in a £1.5million interior-designed villa with a swimming pool and a view over the sea and mountains

Last year Hatton said he was 'inspired' by Jeremy Corbyn's leadership which has seen the hard Left reassert control over the party.

He said: 'In all my time I have never witnessed such passion, such energy and such powerful socialist leadership.

'Many people, myself included, probably never thought we would witness an unswerving socialist like Jeremy Corbyn at the helm.

'He stands there with a set of policies clearly aimed at benefiting the vast majority of people in this country and a strategy which will not be dictated to, or influenced by, the five billionaires who own 90 per cent of the country's media.'

He initially claimed he had rejoined the party last September, after having an application rejected in 2015.

A Labour Party spokesman said: 'We don't comment on individual membership statuses.'

Conservative MP Paul Masterton called it an 'incredible decision', saying: 'The timing of this announcement is unbelievable. Labour probably lining him up as a candidate for a by-election.'

His Tory colleague Chris Green said: 'Someone ought to tell Labour that that ejecting Luciana Berger and taking Derek Hatton back in is not an upgrade.'

DailyFail's take on it.

I'm on board with Corbyn's socialist views, but I'm not so keen just to back loonies who also agree with them, simply because.

Whenever it comes to antisemitism scandals Corbyn just seems to attract flies like shit.
 
Nov 20, 2017
793
People in here acting like Derek Hatton isn't complete robbing scum, a rape apologist, a lunatic, corrupt and the worlds biggest hypocrite. He's also, actually, a professional Marxist agitator. If you're happy being in a party with Hatton you're in the wrong party.
 

PJV3

Member
Oct 25, 2017
25,676
London
People in here acting like Derek Hatton isn't complete robbing scum, a rape apologist, a lunatic, corrupt and the worlds biggest hypocrite. He's also, actually, a professional Marxist agitators. If you're happy being in a party with Hatton you're in the wrong party.

I don't know anything about him besides the militant period, I just said he's got a big mouth and a little bit of digging is going to bring everything out without much effort, he wasn't exactly a smart political operator at his peak.

If he's that bad then kick him out, how did the rape stuff( idon't know about it) not come up at the meeting?
 
Nov 20, 2017
793
I don't know anything about him besides the militant period, I just said he's got a big mouth and a little bit of digging is going to bring everything out without much effort, he wasn't exactly a smart political mover at his peak.

If he's that bad then kick him out, how did the rape stuff( idon't know about it) not come up at the meeting?

There appears to be quite a lot that many of you don't know.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.li...atton-courts-identity-defendants-11016485.amp

He is the scum of the earth, a left wing version of Tommy Robinson.

I'm actually amazed that on here of all places, people act like the SWP and Militant were just fluffy lefties given a hard time. The people behind it are back in the party and pulling the strings.
 

PJV3

Member
Oct 25, 2017
25,676
London
He is the scum of the earth, a left wing version of Tommy Robinson.

I don't agree with him on the rape stuff because it might deter other victims coming forward, but I don't see the Tommy Robinson link, didn't he want everybody named in the case even if it ruined the trial.

I'm going to post this and something worse will have been added.
 
Oct 26, 2017
10,499
UK
A tweet demanding Jewish people speak out against Israel's actions - that's racist. In the same way its racist when someone demands "Muslims speak out against terrorists".

If you think plainly racist tweets (that he's since deleted) are mountains out of molehills then fine....

You'll just defend anything that much is clear. I'd rather not defend overt racism thanks.

It's fucking maddening to see this kind of comment. It's really not difficult to tweet out your horror at the amount of people who advocate for pro Palestine genocide and turn a blind eye to what's been happening in the region for decades (e.g. some of the people who rightly complain that the elections in Venezuela were rigged also state racist bullshit like Hamas is the will of the Palestinian people ignoring the nature of how they were elected, the blatant oppression the Palestinian people suffer, oh and the fact there hasn't been an election in over 10 years) However, it's real simple to word it so you're against support of Israel rather than making it antisemitic assuming you aren't an antisemite.

At the same time it's hilarious to see you make such a big deal of this when one of your posts in this thread was a clear and simply stating that you think the blatant racist Tory policies that literally ruin the lives of PoC aren't racist issues at all.

There is such a thing as a party that takes racism very seriously and takes strong and appropriate action when issues are reported. Like virtually every mainstream party in British politics right now - apart from the Labour party.....
 
Last edited:

Deleted member 862

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,646
Very reasonable article, I was wondering what Polly would say.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/feb/18/labour-schism-sdp-brexit-seven-mps

This is key for me and it's amazing how many people struggle with it.
I definitely agree with this

But now Corbyn needs to back the Peter Kyle/Phil Wilson clever compromise. Their plan is for MPs to agree to pass Theresa May's bad deal, but only on condition it is put to the voters for a final decision. People on both sides of the divide are gathering round this option as the best chance of resolving Brexit, once and for all, whenever May finally holds her meaningful vote. The plan lets MPs in Brexit-voting seats obey their electorate by voting for May's Brexit – but frees them to campaign to remain in a referendum. The good signs are that McDonnell and Starmer are warming to the plan. This will be Corbyn's vital test: in the end he will have no choice but to do the right thing.

If the Labour leader ends up in any way enabling Brexit; if as a modern-day Ramsay MacDonald he makes Labour complicit in this historic Tory catastrophe, then expect all hell to break loose in the party. If he goes against the will of his party, the great majority of his voters and his MPs, the party will break apart – and so it should. But that hasn't happened. These seven are jumping a gun that may never be fired. They will find it cold out there. I know that from experience. So deep was the SDP/Labour split that sitting in the Guardian canteen, Labourites picked up their plates and walked away from us SDP-ites. Schism is bitter and personal. And in this particular case, needless.
 

Zappy

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
3,738
It's fucking maddening to see this kind of comment. It's really not difficult to tweet out your horror at the amount of people who advocate for pro Palestine genocide and turn a blind eye to what's been happening in the region for decades (e.g. some of the people who rightly complain that the elections in Venezuela were rigged also state racist bullshit like Hamas is the will of the Palestinian people ignoring the nature of how they were elected, the blatant oppression the Palestinian people suffer, oh and the fact there hasn't been an election in over 10 years) However, it's real simple to word it so you're against support of Israel rather than making them antisemitic assuming you aren't an antisemite.

At the same time it's hilarious to see you make such a big deal of this when one of your posts in this thread was a clear and simply stating that you think the blatant racist Tory policies that literally ruin the lives of PoC aren't racist issues at all.

Blaming the actions of a nation state on a particular race, is - let me type slowly so you understand - R.....A.....C.....I......S.......T

Criticising Israel is NOT racist. Telling "Jewish people" they should be more vocal about the actions of Israel IS racist.

It really is that simple.
 

Crocks

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
963
How does that work?

"Mrs May - we'll back your deal on the condition its put to a public vote"

"No"

Then what? There is no way May is allowing a 2nd referendum as just like a CU she knows it completely destroys her party.

It would have to be via Cooper-Boles, as a cross-party initiative relying on some Tory rebels.
 

Uzzy

Gabe’s little helper
Member
Oct 25, 2017
27,178
Hull, UK
How does that work?

"Mrs May - we'll back your deal on the condition its put to a public vote"

"No"

Then what? There is no way May is allowing a 2nd referendum as just like a CU she knows it completely destroys her party.

As an amendment to the meaningful vote, it'll likely gather a lot of support, including from remainers in the Tory party, even potentially the Cabinet. May might dislike it, but she can't ignore statute law just yet.
 

Deleted member 862

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
8,646
How does that work?

"Mrs May - we'll back your deal on the condition its put to a public vote"

"No"

Then what? There is no way May is allowing a 2nd referendum as just like a CU she knows it completely destroys her party.
Every option upsets someone in the Tory party, that's the problem. Eventually she's going to have to settle on something and since this is her deal and she's still clinging to it for dear life there's no reason she'd say no.
 

Zappy

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
3,738
It would have to be via Cooper-Boles, as a cross-party initiative relying on some Tory rebels.

Of course - but there is no majority in parliament for a 2nd vote. The only way you get a majority for it is if Labour and the Tories officially whip for it as their preferred option. Without that there is no way a majority - even as a conditional on approval of the deal.

And furthermore what would the question be in such a referendum? The deal or no deal? The deal or no Brexit? Because I think you're into very dodgy grounds as even the 2nd referendum supporting MPs can't agree what the question is.....
 

Zappy

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
3,738
As an amendment to the meaningful vote, it'll likely gather a lot of support, including from remainers in the Tory party, even potentially the Cabinet. May might dislike it, but she can't ignore statute law just yet.

It doesn't command close to a majority. Nowhere near....
 

TechnicPuppet

Member
Oct 28, 2017
10,834
Of course - but there is no majority in parliament for a 2nd vote. The only way you get a majority for it is if Labour and the Tories officially whip for it as their preferred option. Without that there is no way a majority - even as a conditional on approval of the deal.

And furthermore what would the question be in such a referendum? The deal or no deal? The deal or no Brexit? Because I think you're into very dodgy grounds as even the 2nd referendum supporting MPs can't agree what the question is.....

Mays deal or remain.
 
Nov 20, 2017
793
I don't agree with him on the rape stuff because it might deter other victims coming forward, but I don't see the Tommy Robinson link, didn't he want everybody named in the case even if it ruined the trial.

I'm going to post this and something worse will have been added.

Hatton and co basically operated like a gang in Liverpool. They threatened and intimidated anyone opposed to them with remarkably similar tactics to the yellow vesters and edl football thug crowd. That's basically what they were.

They took control of Liverpool city council and ran an illegal budget, threw public services into chaos to the extent that Liverpool didn't recover until the EU funded the regeneration which has led to Liverpool becoming a world class city instead of the ghetto that Hatton left. Famously, he used council funds to pay for taxis to deliver redundancy notices to workers who lost their jobs because of his dickheaded radical stupidity.

That's just the beginning of Hatton and his fuckery. Honestly, read anything about Hatton, militant and the SWP not written by them and there is absolutely no way you'd be half defending any of them. The Tories spent all of the 80s pointing at Hatton and saying look what you'll get with Labour.

The fact that he's now a millionaire based upon a property empire built up by flipping ex council houses is just the icing on the cunt cake.
 
Last edited:

PJV3

Member
Oct 25, 2017
25,676
London
Hatton and co basically operated like a gang in Liverpool. They threatened and intimidated anyone opposed to them with remarkably similar tactics to the yellow vesters and edl football thug crowd. That's basically what they were.

They took control of Liverpool city council and ran an illegal budget, threw public services into chaos to the extent that Liverpool didn't recover until the EU funded the regeneration which has led to Liverpool becoming a world class city instead of the ghetto that Hatton left. Famously, he used council funds to pay for taxis to deliver redundancy notices to workers who lost their jobs because of his dickheaded radical stupidity.

That's just the beginning of Hatton and his fuckery. Honestly, read anything about Hatton, militant and the SWP not written by them and there is absolutely no way you'd be half defending any of them. The Tories spent all of the 80s pointing at Hatton and saying look what you'll get with Labour.

I know some of the fuckery of those years and I'm not defending it beyond the heightened anger of the Thatcher years, but he has had almost nothing to do with politics as far as I can tell for 30 years.

He's a nobody, he seems to be more centrist than Corbyn on a few things, I've spent more time thinking about him today than the last 20 years put together.

If he's just becoming an ordinary member I don't really care, if he's trying it on then it's another thing, I'm happy for him to be booted out if more emerges.
 
Oct 26, 2017
10,499
UK
Blaming the actions of a nation state on a particular race, is - let me type slowly so you understand - R.....A.....C.....I......S.......T

Criticising Israel is NOT racist. Telling "Jewish people" they should be more vocal about the actions of Israel IS racist.

It really is that simple.

That's literally what I said? That it's easy to avoid making blatantly antisemitic comments if you aren't an antisemite. I also said it's funny that you're so against that when you've already said a statement that is arguably more RACIST by excusing actual racist policy.
 

SwitchedOff

Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,516
Hatton and co basically operated like a gang in Liverpool. They threatened and intimidated anyone opposed to them with remarkably similar tactics to the yellow vesters and edl football thug crowd. That's basically what they were.

They took control of Liverpool city council and ran an illegal budget, threw public services into chaos to the extent that Liverpool didn't recover until the EU funded the regeneration which has led to Liverpool becoming a world class city instead of the ghetto that Hatton left.

That's just the beginning of Hatton and his fuckery. Honestly, read anything about Hatton, militant and the SWP not written by them and there is absolutely no way you'd be half defending any of them.

Gping off at a tangent here, but speaking of Hatton, there was a British TV mini-series in 1991 starring Michael Palin and Robert Lindsay, written by Alan Bleasdale (writer of Boys from the Blackstuff, etc). Robert Lindsay's character (Michael Murray) appeared to be based on Hatton.

It's a really fantastic mini-series, if anyone reading this can get hold of it then do yourselves a favour and devour it. It's available on DVD in the UK and Amazon Prime (UK). Here's the Wikipedia page:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G.B.H._(TV_series)
 
Last edited:

travisbickle

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,953
They took control of Liverpool city council and ran an illegal budget, threw public services into chaos to the extent that Liverpool didn't recover until the EU funded the regeneration which has led to Liverpool becoming a world class city instead of the ghetto that Hatton left. Famously, he used council funds to pay for taxis to deliver redundancy notices to workers who lost their jobs because of his dickheaded radical stupidity.

He was only 3 years in office, his fucked up spending ideas didn't fuck Liverpool, 15 years of Tory rule did.
 

Zappy

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
3,738
I know some of the fuckery of those years and I'm not defending it beyond the heightened anger of the Thatcher years, but he has had almost nothing to do with politics as far as I can tell for 30 years.

He's a nobody, he seems to be more centrist than Corbyn on a few things, I've spent more time thinking about him today than the last 20 years put together.

If he's just becoming an ordinary member I don't really care, if he's trying it on then it's another thing, I'm happy for him to be booted out if more emerges.

You sound exactly like the Tommy Robinson apologists.....
 

Zappy

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
3,738
That's literally what I said? That it's easy to avoid making blatantly antisemitic comments if you aren't an antisemite. I also said it's funny that you're so against that when you've already said a statement that is arguably more RACIST by excusing actual racist policy.

What racist policy am I defending?
 

Crocks

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
963
Running the illegal budget meant that Liverpool couldn't finance itself properly for years and years afterwards. The Tories left the place in a mess but Hatton and co set fire to the only way to mitigate.
Also the problem with Militant wasn't "oh, they're a bit too lefty for us". It was their bullying and their subversions of the party mechanics to gain a control over CLPs that were the problem.
 

travisbickle

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,953
Running the illegal budget meant that Liverpool couldn't finance itself properly for years and years afterwards. The Tories left the place in a mess but Hatton and co set fire to the only way to mitigate.


Damned if you do damned if you don't really. He tried to fuck with the Tories (along with other councils) and he lost. But it's not like the bending over backwards that councils do nowadays under the current Tory government has worked, the Tories keep cutting and cutting budgets every year and The Ass-kissing does nothing.
 
Oct 25, 2017
660
Hey Getafe, could you clarify why you believe Enoch Powell was a Labour MP? Was he one of those professional Marxist agitators too?
 

Zappy

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
3,738
User Banned (1 Week): Inflammatory revisionism and excusing racism
What very serious, strong, and appropriate was taken towards our PM headed hostile environment and windrush?

I'm not defending that policy. But it isn't racist in itself. Its xenophobic, bigoted and completely unacceptable IMO. However, it wasn't a "racist policy". It wasn't targeted at "Jews or Asians or Black people" it was simply a plan to create a "hostile environment" to try and deter illegal immigrants from any race or ethnicity from entering the country.

It is completely wrong. And of course some of the interpretations and implementations were racist. But the policy itself as abhorrent as it is, is not racist.

It is also not a policy that is exclusive to this country.
 

Garjon

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,998
Running the illegal budget meant that Liverpool couldn't finance itself properly for years and years afterwards. The Tories left the place in a mess but Hatton and co set fire to the only way to mitigate.
While this is true, it ignores what the Tories were doing to councils all over the country to the point where multiple councils made similar protests (though none went as far as in Liverpool)
 
Nov 20, 2017
793
While this is true, it ignores what the Tories were doing to councils all over the country to the point where multiple councils made similar protests (though none went as far as in Liverpool)

Which they were able to do because Hatton and militant made the Labour party completely unelectable, to the point where thatched got through a war, recession and national strikes.