So a few things. But before i begin.
UPPITY BODY LANGUAGE. UPPITY........ BODY......... LANGUAGE. I'm so glad this thread wasn't locked, otherwise i wouldn't have known the beauty of uppity body language. I'm gonna need to find that in a gif form. So i can post the shit out of it in the future. LMAO.
Firstly: I have no problem with Plinkett as a character. *raises finger*☝️ HOWEVER. When i do have a problem with him, is when it's clear that it was Mike talking during the TFA and TLJ reviews. (kids not caring about seeing themselves on screen etc) And not just the character.
Secondly: I used to be very fond of Rich, but then as time went on and i watched the Re-Rec live streams. I became disappointed, then grew to dislike him.
See, from the outside. Rich's problem is that he suffers from. Nerd Persecution Complex. Which explains (but doesn't excuse, just to be clear) his actions.
There was a third, but the uppity body language completely threw me off. And i forgotten LMAO.
This I'm a little puzzled with, though. I'd think that the stuff lined up in the OP provides a pretty good reason of why they'd need something to underline that these comments are not meant to be taken as face value and adopted by the audience.
This isn't directed at you. But If you need to be told that a serial killing old man isn't to be taken seriously. Then there's something wrong with you.
Plinkett isn't the problem in this.
RLM popularised the 'YouTube movie review' format where you cynically watch the film beat for beat and point out all the plotholes and other perceived flaws. They're just CinemaSins with more words
Which is ironic, as Jay (rightfully) despises Cinemasins and that style of film criticism.
Though i would say. That RLM's style of film critisim is different from those peoples.
rich is probably pro-gamergate as fuck. he clearly seems to be that type.
Nah. Rich may be many things, but he isn't a GGer.
Unban Bobby. This thread is his moment to shine.
Slightly off topic, I disagree with the whole banning discussion on this or that personality: some posters in this thread are already gloating about getting so and so banned here and I think this fosters the wrong type of culture.
Agreed.
Which says admin/mods don't want to upset members even if the content the OT about is extremely questionable. It is the reason many bad faith and questionable members continue to thrive on here because they have fans and admin doesn't want to put their foot down and upset people by weeding the place out.
I've been banned for yelling about era not weeding out the scum. But i completely disagree with you.
I do not believe that banning topics are the same thing, as banning cunty members.
I don't want to be treated like a child being told what i can, and can't talk about. And wish era wouldn't ban topics from being talked about. So i'm glad they haven't banned RLM.