• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Dec 22, 2017
7,099
Can I ask: do you hate the Canto Bight stuff? Why? What is so offensive about it?

Completely subjective, but I hated the way it looked. Felt like something out of the Hunger Games, not Star Wars. I get not everything needs to be "used future" but just was ugly and distracting to me. Especially since the rest of the movie is beautifully shot.

Also did not care for the parking citation gag and some of BB-8's antics, but that was minor.

Also, also made the chase scene less suspenseful to me, since they were able to freely come and go.
 

Betty

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
17,604
she told him the plan, they were escaping to crait

he throw shit around and call her a coward and a traitor.

No, she just told him they were escaping on shuttles, nothing about Crait.

After Leia knocks him out and he wakes up, THEN he sees and learns about Crait and says "This... might actually work."
 

PKthndr

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,587
The video is very well done and highlights a lot of what TLJ does right, while not putting it on a pedestal.

By. The. Fucking. Villain.

Do you also think "There is no good or evil, only power" is the thesis of Harry Potter?
Seriously. You can tell people in this thread either haven't watched the video in the OP (the video this thread is about), or they were just sound asleep during it.
 

CJSeven

Member
Oct 30, 2018
773
It still spends way too much screen time creating and attempting to clean up its own messes, rather than being a compelling 2nd (let alone 8th) act.

Seems like half of his "see, this is why this makes sense" points are entirely self-referential to things that happen within TLJ.
 
Oct 27, 2017
744
New York, NY
What about the fact that light-speed reaming of ships kind of completely breaks the universe and every strategy used in every battle we have ever seen? Thats my single biggest complaint with it.
 
Dec 31, 2017
1,724
TLJ is such a mixed bag for me. The music, the photography, the effects, the sound design... all fucking fantastic. I mean, this film looks and sounds AMAZING.

But my boy Finn! The plot of not telling Poe what's happening. The Canto bright junk. My girl Phasma! Rose and Finn's kiss felt forced. The handling of Luke and his refusal to help (and to a lesser extent how he didn't react to his buddy Han's death). Chewy just felt like he was there. I didn't like any of that. Thought it was handled poorly.

Everything else was fine. Even the darker tone of the movie. Didn't care for Snoke so his death, although surprising, wasn't a big deal to me. All in all, I don't see why it aggravates people so much and on the flip side, I don't see how so many see this movie without faults.
That's where I fall.

It's not a great movie. Not the worst either. In fact episode 7 and 8 are about the same in my eyes. Saw them, don't ever need to see them again.

I know it's cliche to say at this point, but a former storm trooper learning the force in a leather jacket is so much more interesting than another grey robed sand planet person.

Oh and the humor felt really modern and out of place.
 

Veelk

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,705
I didn't realize Luke was the villain?
Did you also not realize that Luke only said this in the midst of his worst moments? That his final words in the movie were "And I will not be the Last Jedi!" spoken triumphantly?

Whether the past should die is a question contended with, but ultimately answered in the negative in TLJ.
 

bluehat9

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,384
Always nice to hear that I don't like TLJ because I didn't pay attention or because I'm just too stupid to understand. Only those who don't like it are toxic though.
 

n00bs7ay3r

Attempted to circumvent ban with an alt-account
Banned
Aug 21, 2018
1,159
Did you also not realize that Luke only said this in the midst of his worst moments? That his final words in the movie were "And I will not be the Last Jedi!" spoken triumphantly?
You implied that the only character that talked about letting the past go was the main antagonist. I pointed out that this wasn't the case.
 

Meows

Member
Oct 28, 2017
6,399
The question is posited by multiple characters whether the past should die but the main takeaway is that it is better to learn from the past instead of killing it.

Otherwise, you end up alone like Kylo who commits to it.
 

MazeHaze

Member
Nov 1, 2017
8,577
Always nice to hear that I don't like TLJ because I didn't pay attention or because I'm just too stupid to understand. Only those who don't like it are toxic though.
Sums up my thoughts exactly. These threads are always full of people talking down to anyone who doesn't like it, and implying only people who agree with them are allowed to discuss the subject. "There's an ignore thread function" etc..
 

Lost Lemurian

Member
Nov 30, 2019
4,295
Completely subjective, but I hated the way it looked. Felt like something out of the Hunger Games, not Star Wars. I get not everything needs to be "used future" but just was ugly and distracting to me. Especially since the rest of the movie is beautifully shot.

Also did not care for the parking citation gag and some of BB-8's antics, but that was minor.

Also, also made the chase scene less suspenseful to me, since they were able to freely come and go.
I can't really argue, because you're right that those things are subjective. I liked all of it, and I liked seeing a different aspect of the Star Wars universe that's not grinding poverty or military. If that stuff didn't land for you, I won't try to fault you for it.
 

BetterOffEd

Member
Oct 29, 2017
857
More condescending "There's no problems with the movie, the problems are with you!" BS, followed by a hypocritical plea to "tone it down"

This movies is not perfect

A lot of people didn't like it

Great movies do not need cliff notes to explain why they are great

It doesn't do anyone any good to pretend the only problem here is the people who didn't like it

Fortunately, JJ and a number of the key actors seem to understand where some of the disappointment comes from, even if they like the movie themselves, so at least the people behind these are working to bring everyone back to the same place

Always nice to hear that I don't like TLJ because I didn't pay attention or because I'm just too stupid to understand. Only those who don't like it are toxic though.

yes, exactly

Can't understand how this is still happening after 2 years, and multiple prominent voices agreeing something was off
 

Bio

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
3,370
Denver, Colorado
Can I ask: do you hate the Canto Bight stuff? Why? What is so offensive about it?

Speaking for myself, my issue with Canto Bight was that it should have been a serious, sobering moment that turned into wacky hijinks. The realization that there is an entire class of people profiting from the capitalist destruction of the galaxy and billions and billions of people isn't really something suited for comedy. It was a great chance for some important social commentary that got turned on its head.

But it's a minor nitpick for me in what is otherwise an absolutely stellar movie that I've come to appreciate more and more each time I watch it.
 

Veelk

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,705
You implied that the only character that talked about letting the past go was the main antagonist. I pointed out that this wasn't the case.
No, I didn't. I implied that it was the philosophy that the character concluded with, which is framed as wrong.

All the characters grappled with the question of what should be done about the past's mistakes. Going through that crisis is not framed as wrong, and why would it be? But only Kylo Ren concluded with "It should die." That was his opinion at the end of the movie and it's framed as wrong. Luke's opinion is that it should be reborn, and it's framed as triumphant.
 

Bio

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
3,370
Denver, Colorado
More condescending "There's no problems with the movie, the problems are with you!" BS, followed by a hypocritical plea to "tone it down"

This movies is not perfect

A lot of people didn't like it

Great movies do not need cliff notes to explain why they are great

It doesn't do anyone any good to pretend the only problem here is the people who didn't like it

Fortunately, JJ and a number of the key actors seem to understand where some of the disappointment comes from, even if they like the movie themselves, so at least the people behind these are working to bring everyone back to the same place

What video did you watch?

And yeah, some people actually do need cliff's notes when they so complete miss incredibly obvious things and whine because a movie didn't match their head-canon. The level of irrational hate and toxicity this film gets from a vocal minority is so drastically skewing any conversations about it that, yeah, that shit actually needs to be combated.

When actors from the movie are getting run off social media by toxic asshole fans, it's a good thing that videos like this exist to counter it. It's obvious you didn't go into this video with an open mind, so why did you even bother?
 

Deleted member 9317

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
9,451
New York
C6pATjW.jpg


She could've been ruthless in her pursuit. Instead...
 

Lost Lemurian

Member
Nov 30, 2019
4,295
Speaking for myself, my issue with Canto Bight was that it should have been a serious, sobering moment that turned into wacky hijinks. The realization that there is an entire class of people profiting from the capitalist destruction of the galaxy and billions and billions of people isn't really something suited for comedy. It was a great chance for some important social commentary that got turned on its head.

But it's a minor nitpick for me in what is otherwise an absolutely stellar movie that I've come to appreciate more and more each time I watch it.
Yeah, most of the serious criticism I've seen is with the tone of that section, and your point is a valid one. For myself, I like the (and here's where I have to use a word that people annoyingly wield as a cudgel) subversion of taking what was proposed as a wacky caper on a casino planet and using it to remind people that there's other kinds of evil besides blowing up planets. If it comes off too dissonant to you, I can't really argue.
 

Lunar Wolf

Banned
Nov 6, 2017
16,237
Los Angeles
The plain thing is that "let the past die, kill it if you have to" is a compelling message and sounds cool to a lot of viewers which is why they run away with that takeaway.
 
Oct 31, 2017
6,747
Except that was the first movie of a trilogy. If he was ready what the hell he would do in the other 2 movies?
It is not good storytelling if the character reachs his destianation too soon.



The dude who spends the entire first movie following everyone (aka being grabbed) around was downgraded to no interest when it had a plot of his own?

Weird, in TFA that I watched: Finn grabs Poe to help him escape and then Finn literally grabs Rey to escape the First Order Stormtroopers... (Rey literally says stop grabbing me to Finn)

What movie are you talking about?
 

Mars People

Comics Council 2020
Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,181
The entirity of Finn's subplot should of been cut. It had zero impact or relavance to the rest of the movie.
If thats all they could think of to give him to do. they should of just had him in a coma for the whole movie to wake up in the 3rd.
Even the actor was publically not too happy about it.
 

Elandyll

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
8,806
Disagree with about 90% of his interpretations (he also sounds like a monumental douche btw, thinking he has to explain themes and character journeys to the ignorant masses of Star Wars fans, to only show the most modicum of self reflection towards the end when he admits being a hypocrite) and I think he himself puts it best when saying he basically was very forgiving of all the bullshit pulled in the movie because he found the themes developed were agreeing with him.
He also had an uncanny ability to narrow down his explanations to very specific key points when a ton more criticisms have been levelled at the film, and under different angles.
E.g. Luke throwing the lightsaber is fine, he already did it in RotJ and everybody who has seen the films knows that. It's -how- he did it, mic drop style, that is a problem. But he sweeps it under the rug saying "yeah, they might have gone too far on humor at times".

There would be a lot to say, rehashing yet again the same points, but I'll just address what remains my biggest pet peeve: the Rose theme of "Saving what we love instead of sacrificing ourselves destroying what we hate". That's after she just smashed in Finn hard enough to almost kill herself, and after her sister saved countless lives dying, Holdo saved countless lives dying, and right before Luke will save countless lives to end up dying.
It was just monumentally stupid, period (and not even talking about the stolen kiss which was just the cherry on top).
 
Last edited:

Enduin

You look 40
Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,470
New York
C6pATjW.jpg


She could've been ruthless in her pursuit. Instead...
I so wish we got a more compelling and meaningful conflict between her and Finn in TLJ. Not even counting the alternate cut fight between them which still wouldn't have been much better. Something beyond a physical altercation. Making all of the primary FO characters look like clowns is fun to a degree, but some of them need to be actually capable and pose a serious threat to our heroes. TFA was not great with their use of her at all but TLJ really wasted the opportunity to salvage that.
 

Zen

The Wise Ones
Member
Nov 1, 2017
9,657
The video is convincing at face value but the snoke bit is off. People had the same complaints about Palpatine in RoTJ and for good reason until the prequels explained him.
 

Platy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
27,644
Brazil
Weird, in TFA that I watched: Finn grabs Poe to help him escape and then Finn literally grabs Rey to escape the First Order Stormtroopers... (Rey literally says stop grabbing me to Finn)

What movie are you talking about?

I am not saying literally. His plot is running away. He than is used as a plot excuse to take poe away from the bad guys, than as a plot excuse to take rey out of the planet than as an excuse to take han to kylo.

I should have changed "grab" to "uber driver". After choosing to escape the stormtrooper life he makes no decision on his own besides "runing"
 

modestb

Alt-Account
Banned
Jan 24, 2019
1,126
I said it in the first thread:

This is a damn solid video, but comparing Luke in 8 tossing the saber over his shoulder (an obvious attempt at comedy which ruins the ending of 7 and the scene itself) with Luke tossing the saber aside in 6 to show his allegiance to the Light side, the Jedi, and his father, is ridiculous and a terrible point.
 

Veelk

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,705
The video is convincing at face value but the snoke bit is off. People had the same complaints about Palpatine in RoTJ and for good reason until the prequels explained him.
I literally cannot remember anything about the time before the prequel trilogies since I didn't even watch the OT's until after the PT's, but my understanding is that people mostly didn't care. And just to be clear, even with the prequels...we still don't actually know anything about his character. Mostly what we learned was how stupid his plan was and how stupid the Jedi had to be to fall for it....

But what do we actually learn about Palpatine? What about his motives, what about his internal desires?

Nothing. He's just this power hungry, corruptive evil old dude that wants to be emperor.

What does he want power for? Nothing. He just wants it.

Does he have any internal character struggle? No, he doesn't have any regrets or insecurities or shame with his actions. He cares for nothing but power.

Do we learn anything about his past? Well, yes actually. We learn that he learned from some other evil old dude, that he then killed. Wow, what a revelation that a power hungry bastard would seek a mentor only to dispose of him once he got what he needed.

Did he change at all in the prequels that help better inform us of his present character? No.

The prequels aren't meaningful development. All you really learn is that the Emperor was exactly the kind of scumbag as slightly younger version of himself you would assume he was based on what kind of scumbag his slightly older version was.

All he is is just an evil old man who dicks over everyone in his quest for power and all you really learn is the specifics of how he dicked over the Jedi. That's it.
 

JoJo'sDentCo

Unshakable Resolve
Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,535
I said it in the first thread:

This is a damn solid video, but comparing Luke in 8 tossing the saber over his shoulder (an obvious attempt at comedy which ruins the ending of 7 and the scene itself) with Luke tossing the saber aside in 6 to show his allegiance to the Light side, the Jedi, and his father, is ridiculous and a terrible point.
Yep the video makes a lot of weak points that seem stronger than they really are.
 
Oct 31, 2017
6,747
I am not saying literally. His plot is running away. He than is used as a plot excuse to take poe away from the bad guys, than as a plot excuse to take rey out of the planet than as an excuse to take han to kylo.

I should have changed "grab" to "uber driver". After choosing to escape the stormtrooper life he makes no decision on his own besides "runing"

Finn is used as a plot excuse to get Poe away from the bad guys?

I'm sorry, you seem to just be saying things you think sound good. Nothing Finn did in TFA was to serve Poe, a character who was gonna die originally.
 

CJSeven

Member
Oct 30, 2018
773
This kind of arguments I never understand, what messes is creating and cleaning up? Like I have no idea what your talking about.

Half of the movie is based on the manufactured mistrust between Poe and Holdo, which leads to the dumb idea to go to Canto Bight, which leads to the FO finding out about the escape plan that Holdo withheld.
 

Zen

The Wise Ones
Member
Nov 1, 2017
9,657
I literally cannot remember anything about the time before the prequel trilogies since I didn't even watch the OT's until after the PT's, but my understanding is that people mostly didn't care. And just to be clear, even with the prequels...we still don't actually know anything about his character. Mostly what we learned was how stupid his plan was and how stupid the Jedi had to be to fall for it....

But what do we actually learn about Palpatine? What about his motives, what about his internal desires?

Nothing. He's just this power hungry, corruptive evil old dude that wants to be emperor.

What does he want power for? Nothing. He just wants it.

Does he have any internal character struggle? No, he doesn't have any regrets or insecurities or shame with his actions. He cares for nothing but power.

Do we learn anything about his past? Well, yes actually. We learn that he learned from some other evil old dude, that he then killed. Wow, what a revelation that a power hungry bastard would seek a mentor only to dispose of him once he got what he needed.

Did he change at all in the prequels that help better inform us of his present character? No.

The prequels aren't meaningful development. All you really learn is that the Emperor was exactly the kind of scumbag as slightly younger version of himself you would assume he was based on what kind of scumbag his slightly older version was.

All he is is just an evil old man who dicks over everyone in his quest for power and all you really learn is the specifics of how he dicked over the Jedi. That's it.
He is also a villain that ROTJ and the prequels committed to, not snuffed as a way of saying he was irrelevant, as was the case with Snoke. If any thing Sheev being in Rise of Skywalker cements the series' dedication to him as an important character. Simply comparing characters from OT to ST doesn't say much.
 

Veelk

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,705
Its really, really not. Its fucking prequel tier levels of awful.
People say that, but honestly, I have yet to hear an actual coherent argument as to why. I get that people dislike the tone shift, but that alone doesn't really explain this level of vitriol. Maybe the simplistic messaging as well. The prequels were exercises in character assassination, unconvincing and bad acting, bad cgi trying to compensate for dull cinematography, and characters making dumb decisions.

Canto Bight looks really nice, has unremarkably decent acting, characters acting in character and not making any particularly dumb decisions during it (like all the idiotic decisions people complain about happen before or after Canto Bight, but not during it).
 
Oct 26, 2017
8,734
Can I ask: do you hate the Canto Bight stuff? Why? What is so offensive about it?

Calling it offensive is a bit hyperbolic, but there is a major issue in that it was pretty pointless in the context of the story. It felt like it's only existence was to have an environmental/capitalism message that didn't really fit the story as a whole. Thus, feeling super disjointed when that time could've been better spent fleshing out the other elements of the story.
 
Oct 25, 2017
1,713
If I need a +30 min explaining why this movie is rich in story telling it's probably not that rich in story telling. It's a garbage movie, don't understand the rabbid defense force here.
You don't. All of the things in the video are immediately obvious upon watching the movie if you're familiar with Star Wars, its themes and its characters. The video is a response to all the angry people, taking apart their criticisms and showing why they're wrong. This video agrees with how I felt walking out of the theater.
 

Veelk

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,705
He is also a villain that ROTJ and the prequels committed to, not snuffed as a way of saying he was irrelevant, as was the case with Snoke. If any thing Sheev being in Rise of Skywalker cements the series' dedication to him as an important character. Simply comparing characters from OT to ST doesn't say much.

There's really no reconcialable way to respond to this because you're coming at this as if it's a given that the evil old dude's being hyper important is just something that's supposed to be the case.

In the case of TLJ, it's literally written into the thesis of the film that Snoke isn't important to the story. Not just that he isn't important, but that he can't be important without undermining the themes that TLJ is displaying.

The entire point of the story is that Star Wars needs to stop repeating itself and stop having these stand-ins for past characters. That Star Wars needs to grow beyond it.

Snoke NEEDED to be unimportant for TLJ's story to work. Maybe he didn't need to casually die, they could have made it to be something like his evil old dude persona is just an act or something. Another way you could do it is have Snoke have some kind of character development that makes him not a shadow of the Emperor.

but the entire point is that having The Emperor 2.0 is not a goal worth pursuing....so the narrative must discard him like the trash he is, one way or another.
 

jviggy43

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
18,184
People say that, but honestly, I have yet to hear an actual coherent argument as to why. I get that people dislike the tone shift, but that alone doesn't really explain this level of vitriol. Maybe the simplistic messaging as well. The prequels were exercises in character assassination, unconvincing and bad acting, bad cgi trying to compensate for dull cinematography, and characters making dumb decisions.

Canto Bight looks really nice, has unremarkably decent acting, characters acting in character and not making any particularly dumb decisions during it (like all the idiotic decisions people complain about happen before or after Canto Bight, but not during it).
Theres a lot of reasons.

1. Not only is it a tone shift from the movie but having a fun side adventure in the middle of what is supposedly a race to save their friends (the remaining resistance) who are on a time table (its only a matter of hours before the lose fuel if memory serves me right when they get to canto) undermines the entire thrust of the conflict. That Finn gets to casino world and walks around in amazement like a child and having to have rose pull him back to reality while his friends are running for their lives is jarring.

2. The conflict from Canto that starts off this adventure is caused by them literally parking on a beach instead of a parking structure. This is one of the dumbest things Ive ever seen kick off such a 30 minute adventure that isn't a comedy. The fact you dont consider this to be an idiotic decision speaks volumes about the gulf between what you and I consider problematic here. Then theres trusting a total stranger to hack into the tracking system just because he said so and got out of jail and trusting that he wouldn't betray them. Idiotic. Them taking the time to free all of the animals but not child slaves and acting as if they accomplished something (to make them hurt) whereas they'll just recapture those animals and have their mega rich insurance fix all the damage is idiotic.

3. The terrible, sophomoric message. I honestly don't need to go into more depth here, because there is no depth with the messaging at all.

4. Awful looking CGI fest reminiscent of the prequels.

Idk how you havent heard a coherent argument about any of this in any of the hundreds of TLJ threads weve had here. Numerous people have made these arguments.
 

Lost Lemurian

Member
Nov 30, 2019
4,295
Calling it offensive is a bit hyperbolic, but there is a major issue in that it was pretty pointless in the context of the story. It felt like it's only existence was to have an environmental/capitalism message that didn't really fit the story as a whole. Thus, feeling super disjointed when that time could've been better spent fleshing out the other elements of the story.
See, I just dont agree, I think it all weaves together beautifully. The failure of the mission and then subsequent actions by Finn and Rose ties into the themes of learning from past mistakes. DJ trying to convince Finn that nothing matters and he should look out for himself is echoed in Kylo Ren trying to convince Rey that she should abandon a lonely moralistic cause for an emotional connection with him. The anti-capitalist stuff and the slave kids is a bit heavy handed, but I think it all ties in beautifully with the revelation that Rey isn't somebody's niece or clone (please, God, dont retcon that, JJ) and how *anyone* can be important, not just this one family. It's a little silly at times, but that doesn't bother me.
 

Valiant

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,310
Theres a lot of reasons.

1. Not only is it a tone shift from the movie but having a fun side adventure in the middle of what is supposedly a race to save their friends (the remaining resistance) who are on a time table (its only a matter of hours before the lose fuel if memory serves me right when they get to canto) undermines the entire thrust of the conflict. That Finn gets to casino world and walks around in amazement like a child and having to have rose pull him back to reality while his friends are running for their lives is jarring.

You're absolutely right here

2. The conflict from Canto that starts off this adventure is caused by them literally parking on a beach instead of a parking structure. This is one of the dumbest things Ive ever seen kick off such a 30 minute adventure that isn't a comedy. The fact you dont consider this to be an idiotic decision speaks volumes about the gulf between what you and I consider problematic here. Then theres trusting a total stranger to hack into the tracking system just because he said so and got out of jail and trusting that he wouldn't betray them. Idiotic. Them taking the time to free all of the animals but not child slaves and acting as if they accomplished something (to make them hurt) whereas they'll just recapture those animals and have their mega rich insurance fix all the damage is idiotic.

This can be explained by them being desperate.



4. Awful looking CGI fest reminiscent of the prequels.

Idk how you havent heard a coherent argument about any of this in any of the hundreds of TLJ threads weve had here. Numerous people have made these arguments.

Maybe it's made to look fake and cleaned up because its filled with fake people who clean up and aren't in the trenches. It's a white washed world.
 

Zen

The Wise Ones
Member
Nov 1, 2017
9,657
My main issue with how Finn is handled in TLJ is the direction his character takes. A non-force user being able to wield a lightsaber with any level of competency is new to the movies. That simple part elevated him above comic relief into a dependable, strong ally. Doesn't matter that Kylo is better than him at it. He held him off for a decent time before Rey came to his aid. I was hoping he would become the main saber user when TFA showed his willingness to use it as opposed to Rey. I really liked that he wasn't just Rey's accessory and that he was able to show such strength of character when she was at her weakest.
There's really no reconcialable way to respond to this because you're coming at this as if it's a given that the evil old dude's being hyper important is just something that's supposed to be the case.

In the case of TLJ, it's literally written into the thesis of the film that Snoke isn't important to the story. Not just that he isn't important, but that he can't be important without undermining the themes that TLJ is displaying.

The entire point of the story is that Star Wars needs to stop repeating itself and stop having these stand-ins for past characters. That Star Wars needs to grow beyond it.

Snoke NEEDED to be unimportant for TLJ's story to work. Maybe he didn't need to casually die, they could have made it to be something like his evil old dude persona is just an act or something. Another way you could do it is have Snoke have some kind of character development that makes him not a shadow of the Emperor.

but the entire point is that having The Emperor 2.0 is not a goal worth pursuing....so the narrative must discard him like the trash he is, one way or another.
It isn't that Snoke dies that makes the point for me. It's that he dies with little in the way of explaining what his actual goal was. They never made it apparent that his aim was to be Palpatine 2.0. So of course there can be no real response to my misgivings - it's why I don't believe the video's criticism of people's discontent with Snoke is valid. It misses why people felt Snoke was mishandled.