Stand Your Ground vs. Castle DoctrineCould the bike rider be free of all charges due to "stand your ground" or killing a pregnant woman would still be too much?
FIGHT
Stand Your Ground vs. Castle DoctrineCould the bike rider be free of all charges due to "stand your ground" or killing a pregnant woman would still be too much?
Yea, no. One life was lost.Jesus, and she was pregnant.
A completely avoidable case of two lives being lost.
Don't ever drive home if someone follows you after a road rage incident. Drive to the nearest police station.
Eh, he created another situation for this to happen at. He isn't an authority. The initial incident happened somewhere else. Some of you are acting as if that gives someone Carte Blanche to shoot someone. Also, the article doesn't really say how they know the initial incident was intentional. She could have been texting and driving, swerved out of the way of something else, or maybe it was intentional but this story is pretty one sided and we will likely never really know.
You don't roll up on someone with a gun in a situation like that with good intentions. There was no reason for him to not wait for cops. Now there's a dead child and a motherless 11 year old. Guns are the reason why.
Counterpoint: She would have been alive if she didn't intentionally run into a motorcycle, flee to her home, and pull a shotgun on her victim.I think she and her baby would still be alive if he didn't have a gun or followed her home.
The baby didn't make it
Bingo.Counterpoint: She would have been alive if she didn't intentionally run into a motorcycle, flee to her home, and pull a shotgun on her victim.
considering there is an eyewitness and the motorcyclist is not in custody - it's a pretty safe assumption she pulled the gun first.Is there video footage of the incident? Because if not, I guess the winner of the latest American gun duel gets to dictate reality.
Even in that case, every other option is bound to end up worse for you. Police will knock on your door eventually, and then you are even more screwed. In this case, she could have claimed that she couldn't stay there after hitting him because the guy was aggressive and dangerous to her. So she drove right to the police. Since they would find a gun on him, they'd probably believe her no matter if that was really true.Why would she drive to the police station after committing a hit-and-run?
Tried to kill him...twice. (Or, at minimum, provided the threat of fatal bodily harm by going inside, getting a gun, and then confronting the guy with it.)Who cares, she tried to kill him. She fucked around and found out.
It feels like when both parties are armed it's just about who shoots who first and then it's self defense.Would she have been convicted if she killed him in this circumstance instead or would stand your ground have reared it's head? I kind of troubled by the thought that this could have gone either way and been justified in the eyes of the legal system.
That's not how this works.what were they planning on doing to her when they caught up to her? IMO you become an aggressor when you follow someone home. All you need is a license plate number to report a bit and run. That guy felt comfortable following her home because he was fucking strapped. Gun culture is ridiculous.
what were they planning on doing to her when they caught up to her? IMO you become an aggressor when you follow someone home. All you need is a license plate number to report a bit and run. That guy felt comfortable following her home because he was fucking strapped. Gun culture is ridiculous.
Are there specifics on how this all went down because I feel like this situation is really hard to gauge without the proper context.A story of two psychopaths. Woman intentionally hits cyclist and flees home. Cyclist, instead of merely collecting her plate number and moving on with his day, decides to escalate the situation by following her home, killing her when she feels threatened and pulls out a gun.
Throw him in prison.
For both good and bad reasons. Iv never really liked that saying. The wild west had unregulated alcohol abuse, drug abuse, gambling ect. which was encouraged. Those things dont typically go well with firearms. In top of that most of those laws were to protect the law officials rather than the populous who more often than not were just as bad as the criminals and gangs they tried to disarm. They didnt want to get a bullet in the back while they power tripped.
I mean she had to go into her home to get the weapon. She wasn't shot inside. She went in, grabbed a shotgun, and came outside to confront the person she just tried to murder with her car.Is there video footage of the incident? Because if not, I guess the winner of the latest American gun duel gets to dictate reality.
While I think following her and confronting her at her home was a lapse in judgement and created more of a mess. I don't think the act of following her while in active communication with authorities so that they actually do something was a completely bad move. Police don't do shit for hit-and-runs even with a license plate.
You don't roll up on someone with a gun in a situation like that with good intentions. There was no reason for him to not wait for cops. Now there's a dead child and a motherless 11 year old. Guns are the reason why.
A story of two psychopaths. Woman intentionally hits cyclist and flees home. Cyclist, instead of merely collecting her plate number and moving on with his day, decides to escalate the situation by following her home, killing her when she feels threatened and pulls out a gun.
Throw him in prison.
Why would she drive to the police station after committing a hit-and-run?
A story of two psychopaths. Woman intentionally hits cyclist and flees home. Cyclist, instead of merely collecting her plate number and moving on with his day, decides to escalate the situation by following her home, killing her when she feels threatened and pulls out a gun.
Throw him in prison.
...so one life then?
Rewind a little. Don't do a hit and run if you assume everyone is packing heat.Just in case the man she hit and run in a road rage incident has a concealed carry permit apparently. Assume everyone in the US is packing heat.
Also: "Just get the plate number" doesn't work if the car is stolen - which there is no way of knowing before police are involved. Happened to my buddy who got hit and run by a stolen truck, witnesses got the plate numbers but they never found the driver.RE: To the people saying "he shouldn't have followed her home." There was no way the guy she hit nor the witness who followed knew where she was going. All they knew was a lady who intentionally struck bike guy in road rage was fleeing the scene.
Where is the story getting "intentionally" from? What was the relation between these two people?
The fucking article said:Investigators said Morales was behind the wheel of a blue Kia when she intentionally hit the motorcycle in the 1400 block of N. Volusia Ave. and then fled the scene
Eh, he created another situation for this to happen at. He isn't an authority. The initial incident happened somewhere else. Some of you are acting as if that gives someone Carte Blanche to shoot someone. Also, the article doesn't really say how they know the initial incident was intentional. She could have been texting and driving, swerved out of the way of something else, or maybe it was intentional but this story is pretty one sided and we will likely never really know.
A story of two psychopaths. Woman intentionally hits cyclist and flees home. Cyclist, instead of merely collecting her plate number and moving on with his day, decides to escalate the situation by following her home, killing her when she feels threatened and pulls out a gun.
Throw him in prison.
Let's take it back even further. Don't do a hit a run.Rewind a little. Don't do a hit and run if you assume everyone is packing heat.
We can go back even further, and say "Don't do a hit"
I mean there was a witness completely independent of the motorcyclist who corroborated everything that happened. If the motorcyclist instigated further we'd have that detail.Is there video footage of the incident? Because if not, I guess the winner of the latest American gun duel gets to dictate reality.
Don't
Is there video footage of the incident? Because if not, I guess the winner of the latest American gun duel gets to dictate reality.
If they were following at a safe distance, doubtful. To get a plate, you'd have to either get it immediately after the hit, or you'd have to be following and tailgating like you're doing a police chase. It's not hard to follow someone at a close enough distance to not lose them and still be far enough away to not be able to safely get a plate number.If they were following her, couldn't they have just gotten her license plate information and given it to the police when they called that the motorcyclist was involved in a hit and run? There doesn't seem to be a reason to follow someone to their home.