I wouldn't go as far as fargodog but I agree with that sentiment. Credit card aesthetic pride/shame is one of the weirdest extensions of our personalities into inanimate, meaningless objects. Credit cards becoming an extension of our personal aesthetic is an odd thing, maybe not the oddest thing, but more odd than other material extensions of our aesthetic.
People getting hot and bothered over the aesthetic appeal of a credit card scare me
Is there a reason they cant just do a Samsung Pay type of solution here? Why the need for a card?
Apple Pay exists and came before Samsung Pay.
This is literally a credit card like you're borrowing money from Apple and they're making purchase interest off you.
Most people will be doing this on the phone via Apple Pay..... but much of America still doesn't have contactless payment, hence the need for a physical card. My thinking is that they won't even release the physical card when they roll out for other countries.
when historians are writing the credit card history, it'll be divided into two periods, BA (before apple) and AA (after appler).
I see your point, it's actually a Goldman Sachs card. But won't they get some fat cut of the interest anyway? Same difference. They gonna be rich.Apple isn't a bank now any more than Amazon or Best Buy are. It's an Apple rewards card from an actual bank.
And so does Apple Pay.
to clarify, Apple designed the card but are not a bank and you will not owe money to Apple. This is no different than Amazon or a store like Best Buy having a credit card. It has their name because it rewards their customers, but a traditional bank is actually dealing with the payments and infrastructure. Apple is not doing something new and evil with money, they simply are making a new card with some cool consumer tools in the design.Probably better. Apple seems to have leveraged a lot more consumer friendly practices in their terms of service compared to other credit cards.
But it's just scary to think how the Apple juggernaut will grow even more massive as they start collecting huge interest from indebted people. They bankers now.
The card is not. The card is for when you don't have an NFC enabled payment terminal and is a last resort. The NFC element is in the iPhone/Watch. There's also no numbers on it. If you want to use the card on a website, the Wallet app will generate disposable credit card numbers and CVV pairs for individual transactions.
Samsung likely has a patent on its solution.
Samsung Pay works with all card readers.
And so does Apple Pay.
Apple Pay (and Samsung Pay for that matter) doesn't work anywhere there isn't contactless payment (ie much of America) so this card is for that.
And so does Apple Pay.
Samsung Pay and Apple Pay doesn't work anywhere there isn't contactless payment (ie much of America) so this card is for that.
That's literally the highest rate for uncategorized purchases on the market, matched in the USA only by Citi Double Cash for the major banksNeat idea - but the benefits don't seem so hot. 2% back on Apple Pay purchases? Not great, but not bad either. It's very meh.
Ah I see. So Apple isn't actually doing any of the lending. Fair enough.to clarify, Apple designed the card but are not a bank and you will not owe money to Apple. This is no different than Amazon or a store like Best Buy having a credit card. It has their name because it rewards their customers, but a traditional bank is actually dealing with the payments and infrastructure. Apple is not doing something new and evil with money, they simply are making a new card with some cool consumer tools in the design.
Then why your comment about no contactless payment? If you can swipe a card on a device, you can use a phone to pay.
Why? It's a credit card just like any other, but with more features to help users prevent that.This thing is gonna cause so many people to get in over their heads in debt.
- when the uber card first came out (it's all black with multicolor accent dots) i got complimented constantly while paying with it from cashiers/waiters and even people i'm with. "What card is that? it looks really cool etc etc"I wouldn't go as far as fargodog but I agree with that sentiment. Credit card aesthetic pride/shame is one of the weirdest extensions of our personalities into inanimate, meaningless objects. All of it is absurd to a degree, but I can understand how certain things are fashionable/extensions of ourselves... The clothes you wear, the car you drive, maybe the phone you use, etc., there's all a level of absurdity to it... but Credit cards becoming an extension of our personal aesthetic is an odd thing, maybe not the oddest thing, but more odd than other material extensions of our aesthetic.
Probably because of what credit cards represent. Ultimately credit cards represent the requirement to borrow money for something that we don't have at that time. Even if you use your card smartly, always pay it off, use it for the points, etc., credit cards wouldn't exist if the majority of the credit was responsible credit, and so ultimately they represent some type of financial irresponsibility (and I know, borrowing isn't necessarily irresponsible, most borrowing is responsible, but credit cards are probably the most common example of irresponsible borrowing)... And so it's odd that we've turned an object of financial irresponsibility into a fashionable extension of ourselves that we're proud of.
But, still, fuck me I want the heaviest card when we all throw them down at a restaurant.
I dunno. Shoes are meant to protect our feet but people spend hundreds of dollars to get this kind instead of that kind. If we accept aesthetic preferences for objects with uses other than fashion I don't see why we can discriminate.
I see your point, it's actually a Goldman Sachs card. But won't they get some fat cut of the interest anyway? Same difference. They gonna be rich.
No it isn't. Credit cards do not imply debt. Further, debt doesn't imply unmanageable debt.
And if we're gonna get upset over fashionable things causing financial issues for irresponsible people, there are a nearly infinite number of examples. Good looking cars, nice hand bags, fancy furniture, and on and on.
- when the uber card first came out (it's all black with multicolor accent dots) i got complimented constantly while paying with it from cashiers/waiters and even people i'm with. "What card is that? its looks really cool etc etc"
- whenever i use my business Amex card, it always gets stares and comments because of the eye catching centurion in the middle
- first time i used apple pay from my watch in 2015, the cashier called over her coworker to take a look at what i did and constant "that's really cool" from many people at stores
any time something out of the ordinary is used as a payment method, it gets attention. so no, it's not that strange
Does it work with readers where you have to dip the card, like gas stations?
What I meant to say was that anywhere Samsung Pay will work, Apple Pay will work.
But in America in particular there are places where you can't use contactless payment of any kind, and therefore you can't use Apple Pay or Samsung Pay. So for America only, they need a physical card.
It's all trivial to me. Here in Canada I could use Apple Pay/Samsung Pay pretty much anywhere. I imagine they won't roll out physical cards to markets like this.
..I mean, most credit cards just come in an mailing envelope. I presume the OP was tongue in cheek?
Those people are already in debt.This thing is gonna cause so many people to get in over their heads in debt.
How do you use your Samsung Pay with a POS terminal that doesn't have contactless payment?But Samsung Pay doesn't require a special contactless terminal to work. That's the point.
If Apple Pay can do everything Samsung Pay can do, as you state, then there should be no need to worry about contactless. If Apple Pay is limited to contactless readers only, then my original comment stands.
How do you use your Samsung Pay with a POS terminal that doesn't have contactless payment?
You don't.
Both Apple Pay and Samsung Pay use the same type of generic NFC POS terminal.
To fix the problem of ensuring that more stores will take mobile payments, Samsung turned to a clever piece of technology that lets you pay at most any terminal where you can swipe a credit card. The trick comes thanks to a tiny coil that shoots out the same magnetic code that those readers normally get from your credit card. It's called "Magnetic Secure Transmission," or MST; it's built into the Galaxy S6, S6 Edge, S6 Edge+, and Note 5. As with other mobile wallets, Samsung Pay can also let you pay with NFC and it will store loyalty cards and gift cards.
How do you use your Samsung Pay with a POS terminal that doesn't have contactless payment?
You don't.
Both Apple Pay and Samsung Pay use the same type of generic NFC POS terminal. They're exactly the same thing.
Sorry I added to my post about what credit cards represent. I had to think about why credit card fashion is one of the oddest fashions, and I think I figured out why to me.
I'm trying to think of another thing that people have pride/shame over that is ultimately a symbol of irresponsibility, and I can't think of one. Most things that are fashionable have some origin in practical, positive utility: A Dolce & Gabbana hang bag ultimately can be reduced to some positive utility; expensive shoes can ultimately be reduced to some positive utility... e.g., Hand bags carry stuff, shoes protect your feet. Now, sure, all fashion is absurd to a degree, but at least those things are positive utilities, that over time become extensions of ourselves. Credit cards, at base, are objects of irresponsibility (they have to be, or else banks wouldn't extend credit cards because they wouldn't be profitable; all the banks would lose money), they're negative utilities, but they've become positive extensions of ourselves. I'm really trying to think of anything else that is a negative utility that someone would want to extend their personality onto, and I can't think of one off hand.
Maybe like a very ornate smoking pipe, long cigarette holder, or heroin needle, like one of those old school fancy heroin/opiate needles from the 20th century or the ~1920s women's cigarette holders for smoking. Ultimately that thing has negative utility, it's a device that shows off your addiction to something, but someone might turn it into an object of fashion as a proud extension of themselves. But, even those probably don't qualify because those addictions weren't generally seen as negative back when an ornate heroin needle or fancy cigarette holder was fashionable.
Do y'kmow how people get into debt buying that stuff? Credit cards.
It looks the same? In fact I was surprised to learn the card is made out of titanium - not aluminum like originally suggested. That's pretty cool I guess.The card also doesn't look as nice as the reveal photos, especially the back of it.
What I meant to say was that anywhere Samsung Pay will work, Apple Pay will work.
But in America in particular there are places where you can't use contactless payment of any kind, and therefore you can't use Apple Pay or Samsung Pay. So for America only, they need a physical card.
Plenty of people with no credit cards struggle financially because they prioritize poorly.
You can actually use Samsung pay without a contactless NFC reader. They own a mag stripe simulating technology that sends a mag stripe signal to a normal card swiper. So if NFC is unavailable, Samsung Pay often still works.How do you use your Samsung Pay with a POS terminal that doesn't have contactless payment?
You don't.
Both Apple Pay and Samsung Pay use the same type of generic NFC POS terminal. They're exactly the same thing.
because it does not, especially exclusive higher end cards.I get it, and I tried to convey that at the end ("fuck me I want the heaviest card" type thing)... I have a pride in my stupid metal black credit card. But thinking about it I think it's one of the oddest things to become fashionable because at base, a credit card is a negative utility... It shows that you have to borrow money to pay for something you want. I'm struggling to think of anything else that has pride/shame attached to it, that is fashionable, that ultimately conveys a negative message about you at base.
What Syriel has been trying to explain repeatedly to you is that yes, Samsung Pay does work on generic point-of-sale terminals. It emulates the magnetic strip on a traditional card by emitting a signal that the generic terminal can read.How do you use your Samsung Pay with a POS terminal that doesn't have contactless payment?
You don't.
Both Apple Pay and Samsung Pay use the same type of generic NFC POS terminal. They're exactly the same thing.
So now you're making the argument that irresponsibility is the reason people struggle with debt? Which is completely ancillary to the original point.
Whoo boy.
Samsung Pay does work on card readers without tap and pay. I do it all the time. I just point my phone at the area you slide the card and it goes through fine.And so does Apple Pay.
Apple Pay (and Samsung Pay for that matter) doesn't work anywhere there isn't contactless payment (ie much of America) so this card is for that.
Anywhere where NFC is available, but Samsung Pay works almost everywhere no matter if they have contactless payment or not (which Apple Pay can't). It spoofs the machine to think you swiped a card. The few places where that doesn't work is gas stations and similar where you need to feed the card into it. So Samsung pay would work for most people in the US.
You can actually use Samsung pay without a contactless NFC reader. They own a mag stripe simulating technology that sends a mag stripe signal to a normal card swiper. So if NFC is unavailable, Samsung Pay often still works.
Ah I see. I stand corrected. That's the little detail I needed explained because I was thinking "if you can't shove your phone into a card slot how exactly do you have any method but NFC"?Samsung Pay works at places without contactless though there are exceptions.
https://www.theverge.com/2015/8/13/9146965/samsung-pay-mobile-payment-credit-card-readers-date
I wonder why they couldn't have embeded the nfc on the other end of the card.
Because then anyone could activate the card on an iOS device if they had physical possession of the card?
The whole point of the Apple Card is to minimize the number of people who have access to anything. Nobody has access to the card number, all transactions are tokenized, disposable card numbers for CNP transactions.
Mine. Got retro Megaman on it.