This is brilliant and I just saw this and almost cried. No shame:
I honestly have no idea what the colors of the suit were, but I believe merchandise often get manufactured from concept and production art before the film is finalized.Hey folks, lots of Endgame merchandise is being revealed, and I'm a bit puzzled.
Was Rhodes rocking a giant Iron Patriot armor at the final battle, or a giant War Machine armor? Most merchandise is rollling with Iron Patriot, although there was one Marvel Legends War Machine figure of the same suit.
If it's Iron Patriot, I must admit I didn't notice. Lighting was so dark in that fight.
Rhodes had some kind of War Machine variation that I imagine might be confused with the Patriot armor. I distinctly remember a dark blue/red coloration both times I saw the movie, but he wasn't really visible much during the final battle from my recollection so we didn't really get a good look at his suit in proper lighting.Hey folks, lots of Endgame merchandise is being revealed, and I'm a bit puzzled.
Was Rhodes rocking a giant Iron Patriot armor at the final battle, or a giant War Machine armor? Most merchandise is rollling with Iron Patriot, although there was one Marvel Legends War Machine figure of the same suit.
If it's Iron Patriot, I must admit I didn't notice. Lighting was so dark in that fight.
I honestly have new idea what the colors of the suit were, but I believe merchandise often get manufactured from concept and production art before the film is finalized.
Yeah it´s blue and red, but the colors on the climax are muddedHey folks, lots of Endgame merchandise is being revealed, and I'm a bit puzzled.
Was Rhodes rocking a giant Iron Patriot armor at the final battle, or a giant War Machine armor? Most merchandise is rollling with Iron Patriot, although there was one Marvel Legends War Machine figure of the same suit.
If it's Iron Patriot, I must admit I didn't notice. Lighting was so dark in that fight.
He didn't get dusted... not in this ("main") timeline. Only the Thanos from the "other" timeline got dusted. Everything in our heroe's past happened as it did. Can't change the past to create a new future (in "your" timeline) in this MCU time travel version.Are there any post highlights from this or from OT1 I should read? I can't read dozens of pages, or however many total, but I would like to catch up a little before repeating questions that have undoubtedly been asked, e.g. uhhhhh so where are the Stones nowadays if 2012 Thanos was dusted before he had a chance to acquire and destroy them?
If that were true, then the Doctor Strange we see at the end would never get the Time Stone, since it presumably went back to the Ancient One who will give it to younger Strange who would then give it to Thanos to destroy. Which I guess is possible, but I can't imagine the writers want to do that, would they?He didn't get dusted... not in this ("main") timeline. Only the Thanos from the "other" timeline got dusted. Everything in our heroe's past happened as it did. Can't change the past to create a new future (in "your" timeline) in this MCU time travel version.
What makes you think Dr. Strange has the time stone at the end?If that were true, then the Doctor Strange we see at the end would never get the Time Stone, since it presumably went back to the Ancient One who will give it to younger Strange who would then give it to Thanos to destroy. Which I guess is possible, but I can't imagine the writers want to do that, would they?
No, that's exactly what happened. The stones grabbed in the time heist were taken back to the timelines they came from while the stones from the main timeline stay atomized. Strange doesn't have the Time Stone anymore.If that were true, then the Doctor Strange we see at the end would never get the Time Stone, since it presumably went back to the Ancient One who will give it to younger Strange who would then give it to Thanos to destroy. Which I guess is possible, but I can't imagine the writers want to do that, would they?
I don't think he has it, which would mean that we have a Time Stone-less Dr. Strange, which is kinda weird to consider. I just think of him protecting the Time Stone as such an important part of his being. But I'm guessing since his next movie has to do with the multi-verse that he'll get it back somehow.What makes you think Dr. Strange has the time stone at the end?
2. One of my favorite aspect of superhero movies is how important it is to keep your secret identity. The constant dramatic tension that provides really made me feel, at least as a kid, the emotional cost of being a superhero, and how mentally taxing that must be. It's wild that the MCU, over 10+ years and 22+ films has almost not used or relied on this device at all. It was used a little bit in Homecoming (haven't seen Far From Home), but compared to how central that idea is to Spider-Man comics, it barely registers: the drama comes from many other sources. It's neither good nor bad, just different, and really interesting considering it's a comic book staple. Maybe it is good, though, since it's a sign of adaptation and changing with the times.
Probably not the first to think this, but after seeing Far From Home, I'm convinced that...
Natasha in End Game is a Skrull. With a prequel for Black Widow coming up, it would be the first time of this nature that we went backwards in the continuity for a character. I suspect we will discover in that movie that she is either killed and replaced or jailed somewhere and replaced. Or maybe she's always been a Skrull.
There's also the curious case of the sandwich theory going around about Nick Fury. Fun fact: Natasha cuts her peanut butter sandwich diagnally in the first act of the film. The sandwich even gets focus a second time when Lang shows up at Avengers HQ. Coincidence?
Either way, I think Black Widow (the film) will provide a different perspective on her death in End Game. I wouldn't be surprised to see the real Nat be alive elsewhere. It might be a cop out for her death, but that's the point if they're going to really play up the Skrulls in Phase 4.
I feel like Red Skull would've noticed that.Probably not the first to think this, but after seeing Far From Home, I'm convinced that...
Natasha in End Game is a Skrull. With a prequel for Black Widow coming up, it would be the first time of this nature that we went backwards in the continuity for a character. I suspect we will discover in that movie that she is either killed and replaced or jailed somewhere and replaced. Or maybe she's always been a Skrull.
There's also the curious case of the sandwich theory going around about Nick Fury. Fun fact: Natasha cuts her peanut butter sandwich diagnally in the first act of the film. The sandwich even gets focus a second time when Lang shows up at Avengers HQ. Coincidence?
Either way, I think Black Widow (the film) will provide a different perspective on her death in End Game. I wouldn't be surprised to see the real Nat be alive elsewhere. It might be a cop out for her death, but that's the point if they're going to really play up the Skrulls in Phase 4.
That was the better half.Movie was not that good. IW way better. The first half of endgame was such a snoozer.
After revealing how completely OP the time stone is, I don't see them getting it back for DS2I don't think he has it, which would mean that we have a Time Stone-less Dr. Strange, which is kinda weird to consider. I just think of him protecting the Time Stone as such an important part of his being. But I'm guessing since his next movie has to do with the multi-verse that he'll get it back somehow.
Thanos dusted 50% of the universe and then broke the Stones. That happened.so where are the Stones nowadays if 2012 Thanos was dusted before he had a chance to acquire and destroy them?
I took her to imply that the alternate realities would only exist when the Stones leave that reality, as she diverted one of the stones in her AR demo and showed how it split into a tributary. When Banner pushed the Stone back and re-connected the two "rivers," promising he would return the Stone, she seemed to agree it would work, but that she couldn't take that chance (until Banner brought up Strange, of course).The Ancient One objected to that plan, because it's not victimless. Alternate timelines would be created. Banner/Stark would be robbing from one timeline just to save their own. The other timelines still need their Stones, like alternate Doctor Strange still needs the Time Stone to stop Dormamu. If Banner takes the Time Stone (not like he could, the Ancient One had him outclassed), then Dormamu destroys Earth/the universe in the alternate timeline.
Probably not the first to think this, but after seeing Far From Home, I'm convinced that...
Natasha in End Game is a Skrull. With a prequel for Black Widow coming up, it would be the first time of this nature that we went backwards in the continuity for a character. I suspect we will discover in that movie that she is either killed and replaced or jailed somewhere and replaced. Or maybe she's always been a Skrull.
There's also the curious case of the sandwich theory going around about Nick Fury. Fun fact: Natasha cuts her peanut butter sandwich diagnally in the first act of the film. The sandwich even gets focus a second time when Lang shows up at Avengers HQ. Coincidence?
Either way, I think Black Widow (the film) will provide a different perspective on her death in End Game. I wouldn't be surprised to see the real Nat be alive elsewhere. It might be a cop out for her death, but that's the point if they're going to really play up the Skrulls in Phase 4.
This would be horrible. Undercutting such a big part of why Endgame was so good:Probably not the first to think this, but after seeing Far From Home, I'm convinced that...
Natasha in End Game is a Skrull. With a prequel for Black Widow coming up, it would be the first time of this nature that we went backwards in the continuity for a character. I suspect we will discover in that movie that she is either killed and replaced or jailed somewhere and replaced. Or maybe she's always been a Skrull.
There's also the curious case of the sandwich theory going around about Nick Fury. Fun fact: Natasha cuts her peanut butter sandwich diagnally in the first act of the film. The sandwich even gets focus a second time when Lang shows up at Avengers HQ. Coincidence?
Either way, I think Black Widow (the film) will provide a different perspective on her death in End Game. I wouldn't be surprised to see the real Nat be alive elsewhere. It might be a cop out for her death, but that's the point if they're going to really play up the Skrulls in Phase 4.
This would be horrible. Undercutting such a big part of why Endgame was so good:all the scenes with Natasha, especially her in Avengers HQ after the timeskip and her self sacrifice. Imagine if that was a Skrull. That doesn't make any sense from a motivation standpoint, but it would also just undercut such an important part of Endgame.
Its just more likely that black widow is just a codename kind of like how many have theorized that james bond is a code name.Probably not the first to think this, but after seeing Far From Home, I'm convinced that...
Natasha in End Game is a Skrull. With a prequel for Black Widow coming up, it would be the first time of this nature that we went backwards in the continuity for a character. I suspect we will discover in that movie that she is either killed and replaced or jailed somewhere and replaced. Or maybe she's always been a Skrull.
There's also the curious case of the sandwich theory going around about Nick Fury. Fun fact: Natasha cuts her peanut butter sandwich diagnally in the first act of the film. The sandwich even gets focus a second time when Lang shows up at Avengers HQ. Coincidence?
Either way, I think Black Widow (the film) will provide a different perspective on her death in End Game. I wouldn't be surprised to see the real Nat be alive elsewhere. It might be a cop out for her death, but that's the point if they're going to really play up the Skrulls in Phase 4.
Doctor Strange could presumably steal a Time Stone from the Doctor Strange of that alternate timeline, but that would be stealing, and the other Doctor Strange might need the Stone as much as our Doctor Strange does. But I suppose that's something that the next movie could deal with, if it wanted to.
I took her to imply that the alternate realities would only exist when the Stones leave that reality, as she diverted one of the stones in her AR demo and showed how it split into a tributary. When Banner pushed the Stone back and re-connected the two "rivers," promising he would return the Stone, she seemed to agree it would work, but that she couldn't take that chance (until Banner brought up Strange, of course).
So, I don't know, at least according to her demo, it seemed like the multiple realities would merge into one if the Stones are returned, but maybe she was wrong and/or misleading.
One such example: If Steve doesn't return the time stone to Ancient One, Dormammu gets to eat the earth.There are always infinite number of time lines, hence the 1 in 14 million chance. It is just that if the stones were to be removed permanently from one, it will have major repercussions.
Rocket did not say that.I didnt think so but when Rocket said Earth was the center of cosmic energy I thought that had a meaning outside of the narrative.
Rocket did not say that.
Nebula said Vormir was a dominion of Death and the center of celestial existence - which means like the center of the universe or something.
I think Dormammu can do that in the main timeline now that the time stone is destroyed, right?One such example: If Steve doesn't return the time stone to Ancient One, Dormammu gets to eat the earth.
I think Dormammu can do that in the main timeline now that the time stone is destroyed, right?