Battle For Portland: Video

Shauni

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,728
Way to completely miss the point.

So the better solution is to start a war and have Americans killed that way?

No matter how much violence you cause, these people will always exist. Always.

Starting a war and getting innocent Americans killed in the crossfire just gives them what they want. A slaughter.

There is always a better solution to violence. It’s up to the people to be smarter than that.
As I said above, the war is already there. For people who screaming about being smarter, you're all pretty dumb to shit going on around you.
 
Oct 26, 2017
1,887
New Orleans
Way to completely miss the point.

So the better solution is to start a war and have Americans killed that way?

No matter how much violence you cause, these people will always exist. Always.

Starting a war and getting innocent Americans killed in the crossfire just gives them what they want. A slaughter.

There is always a better solution to violence. It’s up to the people to be smarter than that.
I don't think anyone's advocating that we seek these people out and attack them.

Rather that we show up with force when they do the same.
 

optimus8936

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,172
No one is stooping to their level so long as they don't put abduct children and put them in internment camps, overseen by an organization with sexual abuse.
Advocating a war is not stooping to that level?
History is there for us to learn to never repeat past mistakes. I'm sure people said "c'mon, it's not like Hitler's calling for the slaughter of millions. He just wants to make Germany great again and kick out the Jews (immigrants, anyone not a neonazi)".

They're already in power, because they've been in power. Innocent blacks are being murdered and children are being kept in cages. Yet we're supposed to give these Nazi scum a pass, just because?
who exactly is giving them a pass?

Guess what? There was a time where groups weren’t allowed basic human rights. The 60s. How was it solved? One of the biggest **nonviolent** movements in American history.

Violence is not a first resort, and should never be.
 

saenima

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
11,944
Okay. When is your next protest? How did you find it? I ask because I sincerely want to start attending protests near me regularly but honestly? I haven't even seen any. For either side.

EDIT: And I've looked.
Like i told you before, i'm in the UK. I am trying my best to be able to be in London on the 13th, to protest Annoying Orange's visit. My work is complicating things. We'll see.

As for you, i have no idea where you're located or what your travelling possibilities are. I'm sure plenty of American folks on this forum will be more useful than me in that regard.
 

nasirum

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,800
Somewhere
Last one was on Saturday, Keep Families Together, which I RSVP'd through moveon.org. They have an option to send you texts based on your zipcode to keep you up to date with things. Saturday was immensely cathartic for me, if you're anxious seriously show up to the next one you can.

https://front.moveon.org
Genuine thank you to you. I am signed up for the Nobody Is Above the Law protests, I never saw the rest of their campaigns.

Like i told you before, i'm in the UK. I am trying my best to be able to be in London on the 13th, to protest Annoying Orange's visit. My work is complicating things. We'll see.

As for you, i have no idea where you're located or what your travelling possibilities are. I'm sure plenty of American folks on this forum will be more useful than me in that regard.
Sorry about that. :|
 

Shauni

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,728
Guess what? There was a time where groups weren’t allowed basic human rights. The 60s. How was it solved? One of the biggest **nonviolent** movements in American history.

Violence is not a first resort, and should never be.
Absolute myth. There were a lot of nonviolent movements, but the 60s and 70s were filled with violence: riots, bombings, shootings. You're very naive about history and what is happening now.
 

Skelepuzzle

Member
Apr 17, 2018
6,119
Starting a war is not stooping to that level?
A) No, because it is a specific counter reaction to a hate group that exists to exterminate or torture minorities, and

B) It is not a mass scale civil war if the push back in physical terms is against specific demonstrations by hate groups.

There is a better way than this. Outlaw the assembly of hate groups. Republican law makers could start drafting that right now if they wanted to. I don't want violence, I want them to not be able to spread their hate for fear of prosecution.
 
Oct 26, 2017
1,887
New Orleans
Advocating a war is not stooping to that level?

who exactly is giving them a pass?

Guess what? There was a time where groups weren’t allowed basic human rights. The 60s. How was it solved? One of the biggest **nonviolent** movements in American history.

Violence is not a first resort, and should never be.
Those weren't non-violent at all.

MLK Jr.'s death sparked massive riots, which led to the passage of the Civil Rights Act.
 

FreezePeach

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,593
Now you're just trolling.
I too, raised an eyebrow there.

For the young folk (like me, kind of, but i keep regular contact with old folk liberals that lived the 60s), the 60s were a goddamn mess of violence and protest. Bombs going off every other day in the cities, cops killing large groups of people. Im always thinking about the difference between then and now. There are a lot more technological distractions at work now that I dont know help or will make it worse.
 
OP
OP
Jpop

Jpop

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,655
Advocating a war is not stooping to that level?

who exactly is giving them a pass?

Guess what? There was a time where groups weren’t allowed basic human rights. The 60s. How was it solved? One of the biggest **nonviolent** movements in American history.

Violence is not a first resort, and should never be.
"First, I must confess that over the last few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season."
The Civil Rights movement was not non-violent. In the end even MLK regretted the passiveness of the white-man and their ability to tolerate intolerance and saw that as the biggest hurdle in their fight.
 

Gwenpoolshark

Member
Jan 5, 2018
3,666
The Pool
Absolute myth. There were a lot of nonviolent movements, but the 60s and 70s were filled with violence: riots, bombings, shootings. You're very naive about history and what is happening now.
Damn straight. The myth being propped up here is that we have to choose one or the other. If violence isn't your thing participate non-violently, but saying that "this makes us look bad" is buying into the very smear tactics that the right uses. No one's worrying about how the fascists and the racists and the lunatics "look" because they've all congealed together. This is the battle of Cable Street people, we've got to fight these fuckers in every way we can. There are many legitimate ways to fight back that don't involve violence, but let's be goddamn honest with ourselves for once: it would be far scarier if a mass of Nazis were able to waltz down the middle of a major American city and all that showed up to stand against them was a bunch of people shaking their heads. This country is worth fighting for, the oppressed are worth fighting for, these people are worth fighting even if it "looks bad." I'm not going to fight them physically because violence isn't in my nature and frankly I wouldn't be much help, but I'm grateful that someone is there for me and others. This is what it means to put your body on the line.
 

nasirum

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,800
Somewhere
Damn straight. The myth being propped up here is that we have to choose one or the other. If violence isn't your thing participate non-violently, but saying that "this makes us look bad" is buying into the very smear tactics that the right uses. No one's worrying about how the fascists and the racists and the lunatics "look" because they've all congealed together. This is the battle of Cable Street people, we've got to fight these fuckers in every way we can. There are many legitimate ways to fight back that don't involve violence, but let's be goddamn honest with ourselves for once: it would be far scarier if a mass of Nazis were able to waltz down the middle of a major American city and all that showed up to stand against them was a bunch of people shaking their heads. This country is worth fighting for, the oppressed are worth fighting for, these people are worth fighting even if it "looks bad." I'm not going to fight them physically because violence isn't in my nature and frankly I wouldn't be much help, but I'm grateful that someone is there for me and others. This is what it means to put your body on the line.
Mmhmm. We're not at the point of the shit from the 60s and 70s though, why not try to control how far the fight goes before it gets there?

EDIT: WITHOUT STARTING PHYSICAL FIGHTS
 

saenima

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
11,944
I too, raised an eyebrow there.

For the young folk (like me, kind of, but i keep regular contact with old folk liberals that lived the 60s), the 60s were a goddamn mess of violence and protest. Bombs going off every other day in the cities, cops killing large groups of people. Im always thinking about the difference between then and now. There are a lot more technological distractions at work now that I dont know help or will make it worse.
As usual, those times have been whitewashed and romanticized. In reality, only when things became unsustainable through violence and civil revolt was progress achieved. And racists have been slowly undoing that progress ever since.

Technology brings a lot of extra variants to the mix. Better communications and assembly means but also a lot of quick spreading misinformation. Also more means of control and surveillance.
 

Kendrid

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,457
Chicago, IL
Thanks OP for the entire video. I had seen parts of it today but not the entire encounter.

At 15:45 that guy got the knocked the fuck out. I had seen it but not the part where he had to be carried away.
 

Oligarchenemy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,316
Advocating a war is not stooping to that level?

who exactly is giving them a pass?

Guess what? There was a time where groups weren’t allowed basic human rights. The 60s. How was it solved? One of the biggest **nonviolent** movements in American history.

Violence is not a first resort, and should never be.
You should probably read about history, because you clearly don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
 

Shauni

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
5,728
Mmhmm. We're not at the point of the shit from the 60s and 70s though, why not try to control how far the fight goes before it gets there?

EDIT: WITHOUT STARTING PHYSICAL FIGHTS
Like I said before, they'll be putting hatchets in our skulls, but at least we had the high ground I guess.
 

Oligarchenemy

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,316
Probably better just to throw the moral high horse people on the ignore list, because it's infuriating to have someone attempt tell others what the "right way" to do this is.
 
Last edited:

MDS

Banned
Jun 26, 2018
120
As a Mexican American, if I don't fight what future will there be for me if Nazis are allowed to March proudly in the streets, reside in the white house and control everything else? They're already putting children into cages, they're one step away from genocide.

Nazis are enemies of the human race. Nazis don't deserve mercy. I'm a pacifist, I'm very nonviolent, but Nazis don't deserve that sort of respect from any of us. Squash them now, squash them hard. Fuck Nazi sympathy.
This is absurd. We've been throwing children in cages since before you born. Get outraged but don't pretend that this is some new step to genocide

These are all 2014




Here's 1992 when the US chucked a bunch of Haitian children in detention camps on military bases, penned them in with barbed wire and kept them there for 20 months until we deported most of them.


There's literally no excuse for the kind of ignorance that thinks this is anything new.
 

Zhukov

Banned
Dec 6, 2017
2,641
Well, that was exciting.

Shit, just saw that. He laid that dude out! The other Nazi's had to drag him away. (It is the Nazi guy that got dropped right?)
Nope. The guy who got his arse knocked out was antifa. (Or on the non-nazi side at least.) Dude had a baton and got whupped by an unarmed opponent.

If antifa are going to be doing this on the regular then they might want to learn how to hold a skirmish line.
 

Skelepuzzle

Member
Apr 17, 2018
6,119
This is absurd. We've been throwing children in cages since before you born. Get outraged but don't pretend that this is a new thing

These are all 2014




Here's 1992 when the US chucked a bunch of Haitian children in detention camps on military bases, penned them in with barbed wire and kept them there for 20 months until we deported most of them.


There's literally no excuse for the kind of ignorance that thinks this is anything new.
And America trots on the grave of my ancestors, which it made. But I'll be damned if white supremacists allow a mandatory policy that abducts children and places them in internment camps while I say nothing about it. It is never too late to reject this shit. Who gives a flying fuck if it's happened already, nevermind the fact that in recent history it was more lenient. This country was founded on suffering and blood but we can do fucking better and it's time that we goddamned demanded it.

Fuck. White. Supremacy.
 

Nuclearaddict

Member
Oct 25, 2017
583
This is absurd. We've been throwing children in cages since before you born. Get outraged but don't pretend that this is some new step to genocide

These are all 2014




Here's 1992 when the US chucked a bunch of Haitian children in detention camps on military bases, penned them in with barbed wire and kept them there for 20 months until we deported most of them.


There's literally no excuse for the kind of ignorance that thinks this is anything new.
Dude, what?
 
Both groups suck. The racists are vile scum of the earth. My issue with antifa is that they don't represent anything that the people on the left are actually fighting for. Dudes who LARP on the weekend finally get to feel badass af. Plus, is there any minorities ever shown within the group? From all the footage I've seen, both sides are both predominately white.
 

FreezePeach

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,593
This is absurd. We've been throwing children in cages since before you born. Get outraged but don't pretend that this is some new step to genocide

These are all 2014




Here's 1992 when the US chucked a bunch of Haitian children in detention camps on military bases, penned them in with barbed wire and kept them there for 20 months until we deported most of them.


There's literally no excuse for the kind of ignorance that thinks this is anything new.
Your context is flawed. There was an influx of unaccompanied kids during the Obama years that needed to be dealt with. Sure, a bad way to deal with it. But the current context is that they take families, charge the parents, and force any kids to be unaccompanied, and then put them in the cages. Point being, context matters and posts like this dont help jack shit.
 

MDS

Banned
Jun 26, 2018
120
Its plain fact. Trumps border policy is depressingly normal and continuous with his predecessors behavoir. The main thing new is the outrage.

I appreciate that people finally care but its honestly a bit repulsive how people are whitewashing their own attitudes and behavior by pretending this is new, rather then something that always happened that they previously chose not to notice or care about
 

Nuclearaddict

Member
Oct 25, 2017
583
Its plain fact. Trumps border policy is depressingly normal and continuous with his predecessors behavoir. The main thing new is the outrage.

I appreciate that people finally care but its honestly a bit repulsive how people are whitewashing their own attitudes and behavior by pretending this is new, rather then something that always happened that they previously chose not to notice or care about
Dude, I've always cared. How can you state that I just now care as a fact? You've known me all few minutes since entering this thread?
 

MDS

Banned
Jun 26, 2018
120
Your context is flawed. There was an influx of unaccompanied kids during the Obama years that needed to be dealt with. Sure, a bad way to deal with it. But the current context is that they take families, charge the parents, and force any kids to be unaccompanied, and then put them in the cages. Point being, context matters and posts like this dont help jack shit.
This is wrong. Its a flattering lie

21% of crossings involved criminal prosecution and seperation from any accompanying children under obama. For the other 80%, we just caged the children with parent(s) until we literally ran out of room. We also habitually broke families apart by detaining fathers seperately.
 

BADMAN

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,887
Its plain fact. Trumps border policy is depressingly normal and continuous with his predecessors behavoir. The main thing new is the outrage.

I appreciate that people finally care but its honestly a bit repulsive how people are whitewashing their own attitudes and behavior by pretending this is new, rather then something that always happened that they previously chose not to notice or care about
I think I smell a rat.
 
Oct 25, 2017
2,645
Why do you think that? Half? Really? What about other law enforcement arms? What about the military? Our military can stand against orders if it's something like helping gun down non-white or non-right people...

Come on. Be realistic. This is no where near becoming an actual civil war. Let's not talk it that way.
Since their inception Neonazi groups have been focused on not only recruiting people but very specifically encouraging them to join the police and the military once they've accepted the ideology. The FBI made note of this over a decade ago in a special bulletin.
 

FreezePeach

Member
Oct 25, 2017
12,593
This is wrong. Its a flattering lie

21% of crossings involved criminal prosecution and seperation from any accompanying children under obama. For the other 80%, we just caged the children with parent(s) until we literally ran out of room. We also habitually broke families apart by detaining fathers seperately.
Actually what i said wasn't wrong. But i get a feeling you have some other agenda.
 

BADMAN

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
2,887
Are you going to actually disagree with anything I said?
Unless the next thing you post is a full break down on why Trump's zero tolerance policy is based in hatred and cruelty and why Obama's policy was shitty but inevitable due to Republican politics blocking any kind of immigration reform then, no. I don't think I'll agree.

I will agree with others in that you're a poorly disguised troll looking to normalize Trump's separation policies by saying they're just as bad as Obama's. They aren't though.
 
Oct 27, 2017
27,140
Seattle
I am seeing a ton of talk about violence and war coming from the left, but let’s be real here. We are not even at a point of mass civil disobedience.
 

Heshinsi

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,991
It is not going to go that far. We're 150 some years after the only thing in our history like that, and the majority of the public still stands for that if polls are to be believed.

If there is violence, it will be small pockets, and squashed very quickly. I believe this.
Large scale violence against minorities isn’t 150 years removed. White Americans (with support from city and state forces) committed the single largest slaughter of American citizens by American citizens, when they torched the wealthiest and most prosperous African American community in America to the ground.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_race_riot
 

PhazonBlonde

User requested ban
Banned
May 18, 2018
3,293
Somewhere deep in space
Advocating a war is not stooping to that level?

who exactly is giving them a pass?

Guess what? There was a time where groups weren’t allowed basic human rights. The 60s. How was it solved? One of the biggest **nonviolent** movements in American history.

Violence is not a first resort, and should never be.
https://www.salon.com/2014/06/14/gu..._breaking_down_the_myth_of_nonviolent_change/

Get off the moral high horse and learn some history
 

MDS

Banned
Jun 26, 2018
120
Actually what i said wasn't wrong. But i get a feeling you have some other agenda.
Feel what you want and infer whatever agenda you please, it doesn't change that your version of events is sanitized to the extreme and lies through its teeth via omission. Unaccompanied children is a very long way from the whole story on why we had kids in cages through the Obama years and before. Do you deny the 21% separation rate or that much of the difference in rates was through imprisonment of mothers with children (up until that was ruled illegal in 2016)?

That you glibly excuse the policy under the previous administration with a shrug-of-the-shoulders and a dismissive "a bad way to deal with it" says volumes about the genuineness of your current concern.
 
Oct 27, 2017
7,885
Important thing is actually to only defend yourself if you feel like your life is threatened.
Fascists are a promise of violence, their ability to recruit is an existential threat to a modern democracy. We're way past tactics that encourage the normalization of fascist rhetoric in a sad and naive attempt to avoid uncomfortable realities that a majority of this nation can mostly ignore, simply based on the color of their skin.

BY.ANY.MEANS.NECESSARY
 
Jun 28, 2018
44
We're letting this happen by our willful in-action. There no more room for moderates and both-sides discussions. They're coming for us.
 

_ifigured

Member
Oct 29, 2017
2,215
Good on the people of Oregon for chasing these disgusting white nothing to be proud of boys out of town.
 
Oct 27, 2017
7,885
Advocating a war is not stooping to that level?

who exactly is giving them a pass?

Guess what? There was a time where groups weren’t allowed basic human rights. The 60s. How was it solved? One of the biggest **nonviolent** movements in American history.

Violence is not a first resort, and should never be.
**Please ignore the riots in major cities**

Read a book, FFS