Did you read the article? Can you really refute... well... any of it? Beto was a great Senate candidate for Texas. He has no real solutions or plans as of yet, and seems to actively be staying away from the more popular policies that the Democrats are suggesting. His verbiage is reminiscent of Obama, but not in a good way because it evokes... nothing. He can't really answer the question of why he's running and why he thinks he's "the guy" that we need to get the country on track. This is going to be the most important elections in American history, and he really thinks that what we need is another "both sides" and "compromise" kind of guy? FOH with that noise.
I mean, I just watched a town hall where he said we need to do something as soon as possible about climate change, because we're already kinda partially screwed. We need to provide guaranteed healthcare to everyone. We need to provide mental care to everyone, especially drug addicts and decriminalize marijuana. We need to pay educators and proxy workers (administrators, janitors, food services, etc) a living wage and get the minimum wage to $15 by the end of the first term of the new President. Women have the right to choose, period. We need to be strong on trade and make sure we're not getting a bad deal, but at the same time we need to work with our allies instead of going it alone and hurting our farmers, ranchers, etc.
Calling it a campaign for vapid morons is not helping Bernie. "Vapid morons" will continue to move to Beto if that's the road his fans want to go down.