The responses here are just as bad as his original statement. Demonizing an ally because he is wrong on a issue or disagrees with you on approaches isn't conductive or going to lead to a change. While I hate the term "SJW" as much as anyone else here, there are plenty of people who make the dumbest of arguments and dilute the conversation on our side.
Just look as far as the people who try and make the case or insinuate Kavanaugh is an alcoholic or has a drinking problem to diminish him because he like every other college student drank to much when he was young. The p point being made should have been that he was out of control then with his drinking, blacking out, aggressive, and that his own testimony can't be taken to be accurate regarding his high school and college behavior.
There are plenty on the left who feed the rights fears and however good their intentions are, the lack of unity on the left can be detrimental to leftist causes. While I haven't watched the episode yet this article seems to be taking a lot of this out of context and cherry picking the parts that will outrage people. Compare this to the right, where while they may have their own batshit insane advocates, they generally fall in line with the party line. Unlike the left, they aren't trying to win with facts and logic, but with feeling and sensation. The left has to win with logic and reason to convince people, not prey on their emotions like the right does.
I also think it's silly to put the blame of this nomination on the people who were going to vote for him regardless. If we outnumber them and can't be an effective opposition, we need to be looking at us and how we can operate as effectively as the right when it comes to matters like this. The lefts messaging is weak when it comes to convincing people to change their minds.
The dems did a terrible job managing this whole thing. The arguments were weak and shifting and lacked any sort of cohesive message and in the end the focus was solely on allegation which we all knew the FBI wouldn't be able to fully investigate within a single weeks time. By the end there was no talk of his failures and policies, and hinged all on a social movement that was never going to convince republicans not to back him considering the republicans tend to believe in "innocent until proven guilty" anyway as if this was some court of criminal trial.
And you can debate what the best route of action could or should be, but if you believe the Dems and the left did everything they could and don't think it could be done more effectively, then that's just pure insanity to back losing tactics. No matter how hard those tactics were tried.
