This is a wild story. TLDR:
• Alice Sebold was raped as a freshman in college in 1981
• Months later she spotted Anthony Broadwater, a black man, on the street who she claimed looked exactly like her attacker
• Broadwater was arrested, but Sebold picked out a different man in the police lineup
• Broadwater was tried anyway, and convicted on two pieces of evidence: microscopic hair analysis (which has since been debunked as junk science) and Sebold's testimony
• Broadwater served 16 years in prison and was registered as a sex offender
• Sebold wrote of the rape in her memoir "Lucky"
• "Lucky" was set for a film adaptation, and executive producer Tim Mucciante became skeptical when the events described in the script differed from the book
• Mucciante hired a private investigator and later two lawyers (David Hammond and Melissa Swartz) to look into the case
• Hammond and Swartz successfully fought to have Broadwater's conviction overturned due to the flaws in the prosecution
Articles:
Conviction overturned in 1981 rape of 'The Lovely Bones' author Alice Sebold
He spent years in prison for the rape of author Alice Sebold, the subject of her memoir, 'Lucky.' A judge just exonerated him
Some quotes from the articles:
I understand these kinds of stories are dicey to talk about, since they're sometimes used to concern troll about false accusations/cast doubt on rape accusations, but this one is worth reading about. What a travesty of a prosecution, and what a crazy way to finally get the case overturned.
• Alice Sebold was raped as a freshman in college in 1981
• Months later she spotted Anthony Broadwater, a black man, on the street who she claimed looked exactly like her attacker
• Broadwater was arrested, but Sebold picked out a different man in the police lineup
• Broadwater was tried anyway, and convicted on two pieces of evidence: microscopic hair analysis (which has since been debunked as junk science) and Sebold's testimony
• Broadwater served 16 years in prison and was registered as a sex offender
• Sebold wrote of the rape in her memoir "Lucky"
• "Lucky" was set for a film adaptation, and executive producer Tim Mucciante became skeptical when the events described in the script differed from the book
• Mucciante hired a private investigator and later two lawyers (David Hammond and Melissa Swartz) to look into the case
• Hammond and Swartz successfully fought to have Broadwater's conviction overturned due to the flaws in the prosecution
Articles:
Conviction overturned in 1981 rape of 'The Lovely Bones' author Alice Sebold
He spent years in prison for the rape of author Alice Sebold, the subject of her memoir, 'Lucky.' A judge just exonerated him
Some quotes from the articles:
For decades, throughout his years in prison and even after he was released, Anthony Broadwater insisted he was innocent of the rape of "The Lovely Bones" author Alice Sebold, a crime she described in her memoir, "Lucky." Convicted in 1982, Broadwater spent more than 16 years in prison. He was denied parole at least five times because he wouldn't admit to a crime he didn't commit, according to his attorneys. And he passed two lie detector tests.
After Broadwater was arrested, though, Sebold failed to identify him in a police lineup, picking a different man as her attacker because "the expression in his eyes told me that if we were alone, if there were no wall between us, he would call me by name and then kill me." In "Lucky," Sebold wrote that "a detective and a prosecutor told her after the lineup that she picked out the wrong man and how the prosecutor deliberately coached her into rehabilitating her misidentification," according to the affirmation.
Broadwater was nonetheless tried and convicted in 1982 based largely on two pieces of evidence. On the witness stand, Sebold identified him as her rapist. And an expert said microscopic hair analysis had tied Broadwater to the crime. That type of analysis has since been deemed junk science by the U.S. Department of Justice. "Sprinkle some junk science onto a faulty identification, and it's the perfect recipe for a wrongful conviction," Broadwater's attorney, David Hammond, told the Post-Standard.
Sebold wrote in "Lucky" that when she was informed that she'd picked someone other than the man she'd previously identified as her rapist, she said the two men looked "almost identical." She wrote that she realized the defense would be that: "A panicked white girl saw a black man on the street. He spoke familiarly to her and in her mind she connected this to her rape. She was accusing the wrong man."
Mucciante "had doubts that the story was the way that it was being portrayed in the film," said Hammond, which led him to hire a private investigator who is associated with their law firm. "It didn't take long, digging around, that we realized, OK, there's something here," said Hammond. He and Swartz listened to the transcript of the trial and found "serious legal issues," which prompted them to bring a motion, he said.
As to Sebold, Broadwater said he would like an apology. "I sympathize with her, what happened to her," he said. "I just hope there's a sincere apology. I would accept it. I'm not bitter or have malice towards her."
I understand these kinds of stories are dicey to talk about, since they're sometimes used to concern troll about false accusations/cast doubt on rape accusations, but this one is worth reading about. What a travesty of a prosecution, and what a crazy way to finally get the case overturned.
Last edited: