They're also doing a Ringworld show
Yeah, Amazon's betting big on science fiction
They're also doing a Ringworld show
The budget is what allowed us such a great movie in the first place. But, stupid people want their Transformers and Fast 8.
I took GITS on its own, i didnt hold it to other versions of GITS. And on its own, it's fine? It touches on a lot of the same things that the Blade Runner films have. Were some of the characters (like Batsu) given nothing to work with? Sure, but the film tackled many similar existential dilemmas and didnt drop the ball with those themes.I think given it's source material and budget and lead actress, people expected more than an average action film with one note characters and a simple, straight forward, and shallow storyline.
Yeah, for AGES! Nothing concrete has come of it and yet lesser known cyberpunk works are getting adapted. Must be something complex going on.
I watched GITS too, as its own movie since I never read the manga or saw the animated movie, and I think you're giving it way too much credit in how it handled its themes. Mostly superficial IMO, secondary to the overarching plot and action. The visuals were great, the action was decent, but in terms of exploring those themes well, I thought it mostly failedI took GITS on its own, i didnt hold it to other versions of GITS. And on its own, it's fine? It touches on a lot of the same things that the Blade Runner films have. Were some of the characters (like Batsu) given nothing to work with? Sure, but the film tackled many similar existential dilemmas and didnt drop the ball with those themes.
It was good.
They're also doing a Ringworld show
Yeah, Amazon's going big on science fiction
I took GITS on its own, i didnt hold it to other versions of GITS. And on its own, it's fine? It touches on a lot of the same things that the Blade Runner films have. Were some of the characters (like Batsu) given nothing to work with? Sure, but the film tackled many similar existential dilemmas and didnt drop the ball with those themes.
It was good.
So stupid people decided to not see Ghost In the Shell, King Arthur, and The Mummy this year too?
I can't wait to never play this.Also Star Citizen is looking pretty fucking dope and Bladerunner like.
same. although you can actually play that area right now. PTU cities aren't coming till sometime 2018.
Netflix is also in on that, sort of:
I mean it is kinda the start of it, not many came before it recently. Not that all of a sudden everyone has started working on something, just that everything is finally releasing shortly after Bladerunner.Didn't this movie flop hardcore? Not really a good sign for this "resurgence"
Imagine the next time we get a Mars film its actually filmed on Mars.Not cyberpunk, but After Gravity, The Martian, and Life (not very good, but not terrible) I feel like I could use another couple of "modern day"/near future space thrillers. We need another Shoemaker Levi 9 type event to ignite it, cuz I am not waiting for a real life mission to Mars to get an adaptation of Red Mars.
Blade Runner is more like proto pre-Neuromancer cyberpunk, it set up a lot of the tenets and atmosphereI've never heard blade runner called cyber punk. Do people outside of my sphere call it that?
The original I say one can argue it isn't, but 2049 has a woman whose job is to create memories, a 1 body relationship with a copy of a mass market software written to fall in love, and corporate goons walking into police stations to take whatever they want. It's cyberpunk alright.I've never heard blade runner called cyber punk. Do people outside of my sphere call it that?
GitS was bad. King Arthur was fantasy, Guy Ritchie, it had no chance. And, The Mummy made bank. Also, The Mummy ain't Transformers or Fast.
The Mummy's box office reception killed The Dark Universe before it had a chance to start.
It very much codified the look, feel, and themes that became associated with cyberpunk as a genre. If anything, I don't believe that cyberpunk would be what it is without BR's influence.I've never heard blade runner called cyber punk. Do people outside of my sphere call it that?
It still made money (about over twice its budget) just not as much money as the studio wanted to start a franchise NO ONE was interested in. But, it was no flop.
Edgar Wright could probably make a really fun Snow Crash flick
LOL You're not factoring in P&A costs and the studios actual take from the box office after the theaters cut.
The movie flopped.
Also the movie was supposed to set up a universe of other films that were already in production and attached to directors, screenwriters, and actors as well as promoting them. This has all since been abandoned despite all the investment in time and money. Why, you may ask?
Because The Mummy flopped.
Should be a given with a live-action adaptation. The idea of pairing those two seems like it'll still be gross anyway, though.Joe Cornish is doing snow crash, and he's writen some scripts with Wright.
I'm excited about it, but i hope the make Y.T. older. The parts with her and Raven were just creepy.
One can never truly know the profit of a particular film fue to Hollywood accounting. We can only look at the budget and box office returns. And, based on that it did not flop. The same way BvS did not flop. However, both fell short of what those studios were expecting. The Mummy was supposed to setup a multi-billion dollar universe, not net 100 mil or so. Thus, its "underperformance" killed its universe. But, from a pure financial point, it likely was not a flop. Adding in the costs of future movies is not fair or relevant.
when the FUCK is mute coming out? huh huhh?
didn't they wrap up filming like seven years ago? what's taking so long? post production big hologram lady?