They still have time to make this right.
I don't think they will. But they are not 100% damned yet.
They still have time to make this right.
They still have time to make this right.
I don't think they will. But they are not 100% damned yet.
I was confused and thought this was from Irvine. Title Update?
Capitalism and money is not beholden to country borders and sovereignty.unfuckingbelieveable. blizzard is still a american company last i checked, the way they throw themselves at the feet of the chinese goverment is pathetic. i hope their american and western audience won't let them get away with this.
Oh i finally got it then!This isn't a new post though, it happened prior to the news exploding in the West like it did.
Like, yeah it's still a shitty look either way, but it's not really a sign of how they're responding going forward.
They still have time to make this right.
I don't think they will. But they are not 100% damned yet.
They still have time to make this right.
I don't think they will. But they are not 100% damned yet.
That never happened, live ammo was only used when a protester was attacking a police man with a metal bat.
Yes they are. Banning a player and broadcasters and taking away money owed over this already dammed them. Any course correction now will just be blizzard trying to spin pr and save face. When people show you who they are, believe them.They still have time to make this right.
I don't think they will. But they are not 100% damned yet.
They still have time to make this right.
I don't think they will. But they are not 100% damned yet.
Not to defend blizzard but what do you expect them to say in a chinese social network
Ah yeah my bad, now it's absolutely alright to kill protesters! All hail China!
Their corporate culture and structure differs from western ones. When Trump started his ban on Huawei I remember a lot of articles highlighting how China mandates Communist Party committees in corporations to keep everyone in line with the political goals of the party.That's weird to me in the sense that PR should have no identity outside of the company, right? But I guess Chinese PR would play differently? Like, wouldn't this normally get someone fired (injecting a personal dimension to a statement)?
The presence of party units has long been a fact of doing business in China, where party organizations exist in nearly 70 percent of some 1.86 million privately owned companies, the official China Daily reported last month.
Companies in China, including foreign firms, are required by law to establish a party organization, a rule that had long been regarded by many executives as more symbolic than anything to worry about.
One senior executive whose company was represented at the meeting told Reuters some companies were under "political pressure" to revise the terms of their joint ventures with state-owned partners to allow the party final say over business operations and investment decisions.
He said the company's joint venture partner was pushing to amend their agreement to include language mandating party personnel be "brought into the business management organization", that "party organization overhead expenses shall be included in the company budget", and that posts of board chairman and party secretary be held by the same person.Changing joint venture agreement terms is the main concern, the executive said, noting that his company had thus far resisted.
"Once it is part of the governance, they have direct rights," he said.
The State Council Information Office (SCIO), which doubles as the party spokesman's office, told Reuters in a faxed statement that there is no interference by party organizations in the normal operating activity of joint venture or foreign-invested companies.
However, it added, "company party organizations generally carry out activities that revolve around operations management, can help companies promptly understand relevant national guiding principles and policies, coordinate all parties' interests, resolve internal disputes, introduce and develop talent, guide the corporate culture, and build harmonious labor relations."
"They are widely welcomed within companies," the SCIO said.
Exclusive: In China, the Party’s push for influence inside foreign firms stirs fears
Late last month, executives from more than a dozen top European companies in China met in Beijing to discuss their concerns about the growing role of the ruling Communist Party in the local operations of foreign firms, according to three people with knowledge of the discussions...www.reuters.com
Tencent, Baidu, JD.com, Sina Weibo, and Jack Ma's Alibaba – just to name a few – all have active party organizations that engage in regular party politicking.
Information technology companies, like social media sites, constantly receive censorship directives to take down things that the party does not want people to see, and promote things that are deemed desirable, as I experienced first-hand last year during my almost year-long stint as a major Chinese news portal.
Once, we were about to publish an in-depth story about villagers living near the Chinese-North Korean border. It was a time the two countries' relations were strained, after China toughened sanctions against its neighbor.
A colleague, who was a party member, halted the story, saying that the company would be punished if it went ahead.
After a few rounds of discussion going back and forth, the editor-in-chief complied and the story was not published until months later.
In another example, the party committee at Sina Weibo, a popular social media platform, created a "public opinion analysis group" to hold weekly meetings to detect and censor "negative" content for a "cleaner Chinese cyberspace."
On top of directing censorship, party committees at top Chinese tech companies regularly meet to study party's latest teachings and announcements.
During the 19th Party Congress last year, some 48 tech companies in Beijing organized watch parties in their conference rooms, adorned with the party's hammer-and-sickle flags symbolizing communism.
These companies include Baidu and Tencent, whose leaders are notably not members of the Communist Party.
It wasn't a metal bat either, it was more like a metal rod or baton, certainly more like an umbrella than a bat. Would have done absolutely nothing to the officer with all their riot gear on.
Looking at your most recent posts you seem to be very complimentary of China...hmmm.
No you aren't.OK we can agree that he was attacking the police man with a metal 'object' you can see from the footage that it definitely was not just an umbrella. I'm very sorry that the facts of this specific situation are getting in the way of your protest
Yea, they're gonna pretend nothing is happening. I bet they'll be banning pro-HK signs.
Probably, but they can't control what people say. Especially during the QA portions. They're going to get lit up during those segments.
There have been hundreds of those lol
Oh I'm sure. Job security would shut so many of us down, so i don't expect many to speak out on these atrocities. It sucks and it's a scary situation to be in, but maybe the pain that's being dealt over in china is fuel enough to get the devs speaking out.It would be but on the other hand I can understand they may not want to lose their jobs (and it's quite obvious blizzard will fire them for it).
People know this came from a Chinese employee in China, right?
I'd support a blanket ban for US tech companies to do business in China.
Yes. We should compare and contrast with the statement from Irvine.People know this came from a Chinese employee in China, right?