I doubt it tbh. There was a 505 rep in the Bloodstained thread last week talking about how difficult and troubled the development on the game was, and that he wanted to put together a video or blog that kind of detailed what happened. And obviously we know that it was a difficult development given the length of time it took, and the developer revolving door they had for a little while there. I think it's more or less that they've been doing all they can to get the game ready for release, and delayed the Switch version to try and improve it as best they could. It would be one thing if the game was completely polished on the other platforms, but it's not, and those are ones that were in scope from the beginning.
Would need someone with a hacked Switch to check it out probably. I haven't seen anyone testing that as of yet though.
Yeah I think people are really conflating some of the bad aspects of this port with the overall "norm" of what we've seen with a lot of games on the Switch, particularly UE4 games. While I do think there is some optimizing to be done, and input lag that definitely needs to be fixed, I think people should expect that this game is going to run at sub 540p in portable mode regardless of what is done, and at 30fps. Unfortunately it may take the supposed Switch revision to push it to a greater level of performance.
What resolution(s) is Bloodstained actually running at on the system right now anyway?
