Yesterday, WSJ reported "Sony Says the Next PlayStation Is Three Years Off". This was quickly picked up by several news outlets:
Gamespot
Kotaku
Polygon
Ars Technica
...and many more. But apparently, without any additional fact-checking, which is kind of interesting considering this is quite the statement, and there were huge red flags:
1.) The actual quote from Kodera, which is in the WSJ article, did not say what's in the headline.
2.) Another 3 years would mean this generation will be 8 years long, making it as long as last gen, which was regarded as too long by many gamers and even developers.
3.) Why would Sony wait 3 years after a long-awaited, new process node, which offers a huge performance increase?
4.) There were apparently other journalists at the same event, who did report something completely different:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...tation-chief-hints-at-portable-gaming-revival
This has prompted the journalist from Bloomberg to come out and respond to the WSJ article:
So there's that. I especially like the Ars Technica and Polygon headline: "Sony: Next PlayStation is at least three years off"
At least! Maybe this generation won't be a record 8 years long, but 9 or 10 years! Who knows! Lmao.
PS: Thought this might deserve it's own thread because it was so widely reported, and is seemingly false.
Gamespot
Kotaku
Polygon
Ars Technica
...and many more. But apparently, without any additional fact-checking, which is kind of interesting considering this is quite the statement, and there were huge red flags:
1.) The actual quote from Kodera, which is in the WSJ article, did not say what's in the headline.
2.) Another 3 years would mean this generation will be 8 years long, making it as long as last gen, which was regarded as too long by many gamers and even developers.
3.) Why would Sony wait 3 years after a long-awaited, new process node, which offers a huge performance increase?
4.) There were apparently other journalists at the same event, who did report something completely different:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...tation-chief-hints-at-portable-gaming-revival
Kodera declined to provide a timeline or specifics for a new console, saying only that a new device is being designed around making it easy for developers to create games and also with an eye on easier hardware manufacturing.
This has prompted the journalist from Bloomberg to come out and respond to the WSJ article:
So there's that. I especially like the Ars Technica and Polygon headline: "Sony: Next PlayStation is at least three years off"
At least! Maybe this generation won't be a record 8 years long, but 9 or 10 years! Who knows! Lmao.
PS: Thought this might deserve it's own thread because it was so widely reported, and is seemingly false.
Last edited: