- Oct 25, 2017
Why is he still talking about what constitutes "copyrightable" material when the judge clearly stated that he lacks the expertise to talk about that kind of stuff:
Indeed, not only has Wardell failed to establish any such expertise, but his opinion as to whether the work in question is “copyrightable” constitutes an improper legal conclusion. See United State v. Diaz, 876 F.3d 1194, 1197 (9th Cir. 2017) (citing Fed. R. Evid. 704). Such legal conclusions are without evidentiary value.