No, they start shouting about lies, remoaners and project fear.
Joke is on them when the continued global warming will overpower Holland's capacity for keeping the water out... :(
If only. More like this
Too many business's will cause their entire country to keel over.Joke is on them when the continued global warming will overpower Holland's capacity for keeping the water out... :(
The comments are better than usual, actually. Pretty hard to spin stuff like this.
This whole thing sucks and is entirely fucking pointless. There's no measurable benefits to leaving other than keeping EU immigrants out if you're an awful cunt.
I'm quite confident remain would win on a 2nd so Q2 has no relevance but 'just in case'
1860. Posted byCarse
on14 minutes ago
My question for you Remainders is what makes you think I as a Brexiter do not want to see your economy destroyed? I know you morons do not get it yet, but we hate you, we hate New Labour, we hate your fake economy, your fake currency, and we hate the EU. Why would you want us to prevent destruction of all that you hold dear? You are blind.
Then you're out of touch and somewhat foolish, in my opinion. The anti-EU propaganda wagon is slowly starting up again already in preparation for any second referendum. And I've seen nothing to make me believe a new wave of lies will be any less successful than the first one.
Maybe I'm just hopeful the large % of people who didn't vote (young demographic) would turn out and vote Remain this time!
Maybe I'm just hopeful the large % of people who didn't vote (young demographic) would turn out and vote Remain this time!
Will they? How?Countries should sanction us for being a tax shelter. Society at large will lose from the companies moving to our country.
We see insignificant returns on these companies sitting here, when traveling throughout the country you see various international (American) companies that don't even have any business here outside of dodging taxes (Verizon in the Hague for example).
I mean.. I get what you're saying, but in this case it will literally bring jobs right? Or are those 250 companies just going to be there in name?We see insignificant returns on these companies sitting here, when traveling throughout the country you see various international (American) companies that don't even have any business here outside of dodging taxes (Verizon in the Hague for example).
It is our government that is full of ideologues who basically believe in trickle down and will invite the world to compe here and pay near zero tax in a way to express their world view. To the public they claim it will bring jobs (documented lie) or whatever, nobody in the country except for the politicians believe this (even public officials protested against their latest attempt at removing taxes on dividends). All that nice talk about the Netherlands having nice infrastructure is paid for by the lower and middle income classes, we pay and the top profits (we're into 40 years of centrally mandaded stagnation of wage grwoth).
Most will be there in name (Amsterdam south has tons of these 'offices'), others will have a handful of employees. Nothing to warrant the gigantic loss to the EU. It is a loss because it is another way to keep the redistribution upwards in place. Those companies could have paid taxes in another European (EU) nation. Yet now they are keeping the money in their own pockets, it is a loss. This is also referred to as the 'race to the bottom' theory.I mean.. I get what you're saying, but in this case it will literally bring jobs right? Or are those 250 companies just going to be there in name?
Also seems preferable (for the EU) to those companies staying in the UK. Or at worst, it still won't be a loss for the people in general, right?
Ireland shares a land border with the UK, so aren't there still unresolved questions about how ports of entry will work?
Nah, I think the Daily Mail or The Sun will put a nice spin on it to say that we're better off without those companies, or maybe they'll neglect to report it at all.
Heh. I commend your optimisim in thinking hat Brexit voters' news sources would even cover this.
Tax haven, good infrastructure, good airport and yeah, everyone speaks English.
Yes. But it also is the highest percentage English speaking country in the EU (well after Ireland). No one wants to go to fucking Frankfurt and France is protest land.
I'm not really sure. We're a major trading partner of the UK and a Brexit would have some major impact for our industries and lots of stuff that's brought in by boat (and would have to deal with inspection if the UK quits the EU) is brought in through Rotterdam's harbor. Truckloads of corporations over here have been forced to put together emergency plans for a scenario that may or may not come to pass and it's been a huge headache, all because of a crappy referendum we didn't get a vote in.
I imagine most Dutch with a stake in all this would have preferred if Cameron had steered clear of the world's shittiest game of chicken.
That was to be expected.https://www.theguardian.com/politic...onal-hq-belgium-brexit-netherlands-ireland-eu
Even the BBC are at it, is nothing sacred?
"In case of a 'no-deal-Brexit' the BBC is set to lose the international distribution of its domestic channels in Ireland, The Netherlands and Belgium."
Without a deal the domestic channels will disappear from Cable and IPTV offerings outside of the UK, which will also result in less income for the BBC."The commercial channels of the BBC, such as BBC First, BBC Entertainment and BBC World News will not be affected, but the British broadcaster will need to apply for an EU licence in another country in the [European] Union."
"Getting a broadcast licence in another country would require the BBC to have their head office (of the international operations), a significant part of their workforce (at least the people who are responsible for programming) and a satellite up-link in the country to qualify for a licence there. Such a licence would be a solution for the commercial channels, but would not work for the domestic channels."