• Welcome to ResetEra 2.0! Guests should now be able to save their dark or light theme preferences, found on the left sidebar.

BREXIT MAFIA PHASE 2 | Border-Line Insanity!

Oct 27, 2017
1,366
0
I asked Swamped if she was the chat creator because CS didnt believe about the chat.
That's reasonable.
Thoughts on current situation - if this plan was laid out in chat last night by you two. Why would scum AB fall for it? Either scum can't view the chat or ab isnt scum. His reasoning for claiming and putting chuggs in his top scum is very shaky. (slight scum lean for him for that)
His reasoning that Swamped being roleblocked N1 is possible.

Two neutral chat creators - You said I was neutral chat creator, Grizzly was a neutral who created chats. No way there are two neutral chat creators.
And this too. I never saw Grizzly as a chat creator. I put him down as a recruiter, forming a third party. Not the way you are painting it here. But all of this does make sense.

This is supporting that AB might not be scum.
 
Oct 27, 2017
1,366
0
Gorlak why do you believe swamped moved n1? Can you confirmed she moved?
Are you PR fishing here? If I had sth. to clarify the situation I'd say it.

First question is because of everything we've discussed in night chat and she came forward on her own today. My doubts on this are here:
2) Swamped is lying. She told me yesterday she moved (in a ploy to get me to reveal my role? but why let me live?). Obviously she now had to oppose AB or otherwise I would call her out. Damage control? Trade her for town tracker because they had to?
I don't see why she'd tell me when she moved and let me live. It's more likely that she was truly trusting me and revealed herself.
 
Nov 3, 2017
1,213
0
And this too. I never saw Grizzly as a chat creator. I put him down as a recruiter, forming a third party. Not the way you are painting it here. But all of this does make sense.

This is supporting that AB might not be scum.
idk recruiter that creates a chat still. Doubt there is another neutral with chat powers.
You are a 2-shot Mentor. During a Night Phase, you can target a player. If their fluff Role Name matches one of your targets, they will become your understudy. If the target is successfully recruited, they will share your alignment and a chat will be created between you both.
 
Nov 3, 2017
1,213
0
Are you PR fishing here? If I had sth. to clarify the situation I'd say it.
How is that PR fishing? If you can't confirm it then she could be lying.

The fact that she says its possible that she couldve been rb or that you believe it says you cant confirm it. So got my answer.


irst question is because of everything we've discussed in night chat and she came forward on her own today. My doubts on this are here:I don't see why she'd tell me when she moved and let me live. It's more likely that she was truly trusting me and revealed herself.
Scum swapped can lie about what she wants. Causes confusion.
 
Oct 28, 2017
912
0
I'm not a straight roleblocker. I'm a thief that steals abilities used that night, blocking the original player that night and able to use them the night after assuming I'm sucessful.

So, Zeke didn't use a chat power on N2 because I would've received it.
But since you said CS/Swamped tried to move, you would've stolen her ability and used that night 2? So how could you block Zeke night 2?
 
Oct 27, 2017
1,366
0
They are both telling the truth from a certain point of view. AB is correct. I blocked CS N1. However, because of what I recieved that night I also townread CS/Swamped since. I believe AB's claim.
I'm not a straight roleblocker. I'm a thief that steals abilities used that night, blocking the original player that night and able to use them the night after assuming I'm sucessful.
This means swamped is definitely town.
 
Oct 27, 2017
1,366
0
It doesn't make any sense for a melon/swapped combo to go for this claim.

melon is likely telling the truth about her power. I don't think she's scum. Are you neutral melonrabbit? Would be no big deal, you helped out town here big time.

I believe AB said the truth about his results. Need to look into this chugger/turmoil business.

We should definitely lynch outside the claims today.
 
OP
OP
cabot
Oct 25, 2017
1,021
0
Glasgow, Scotland
nin
(3 votes)
malus - #4,207
dcpat - #4,250
alexem - #4,460

melonrabbit
(1 votes)
ezekelrage - #4,198
#4,304
ezekelrage - #4,314
gorlak - #4,386
#4,468

absolutbro
(1 votes)
swamped - #4,417

z-beat
(1 votes)
nin - #4,428

ezekelrage
(1 votes)
melonrabbit - #4,224

Post Counts:
gorlak: 98 ezekelrage: 78 absolutbro: 34 dcpat: 28 melonrabbit: 26 swamped: 21 malus: 14 nin: 13 alexem: 11 z-beat: 10 fireblend: 2 becks': 1 cabot: 1 gir: 1 grizzly: 1
 
Oct 25, 2017
950
0
12. [m] Alexem - GMT
16. [m] gir - GMT
18. [m] B-Dubs - EST [m] malus - UTC+1
19. [m] DCPat - UTC+1
20. [m] Z-Beat - PST
These 5 are our quiet, outside the claim folks. Of them, I lean town on gir and probably scum on Alexem or Z-Beat. Malus is a blind spot and DCPat I kind of lean town but not based on a lot really. He was willing to at least put out a case for nin, which seems an odd scum choice for a lynch target.
 
Oct 25, 2017
950
0
You and her make no sense on the same team.
Her and LP make no sense on the same team.

-> either you are scum tracker or she's neutral thief
I try not to make too much sense of the game balance until the end. Fact is I don't know what all the roles are until it's over.

I know I'm a watcher and I know that I didn't see coolest move N1. I can see a town thief opposite a scum roleblocker, since that leaves everyone scratching their heads on who blocked what.